Video: Bombs Going Off Before The 2nd Plane Hits?

kookbreaker said:
The new reimaging shows that the Death Star explosion was an inside job.

'Chain Reaction Photon Torpedo theory' my butt!
Click to expand...

Of course, Darth Vader engineered it, with the sucessful completion of the Death Star Grand Moff Tarkin was more powerful than Darth Vader and could conceivably challenge Darth Vader for his #2 job in the Empire, and let's face it the Empire's redundancy policies stink!

Why do you think Vader went out after the rebels in his fighter? To escape!
 
J. Arthur Hastur said:
Of course, Darth Vader engineered it, with the sucessful completion of the Death Star Grand Moff Tarkin was more powerful than Darth Vader and could conceivably challenge Darth Vader for his #2 job in the Empire, and let's face it the Empire's redundancy policies stink!

Why do you think Vader went out after the rebels in his fighter? To escape!
Click to expand...

What we need to be asking though, is where was Admiral Thrawn during this. It is just too convenient that he was off fighting a "threat to the Empire" during this time.


(man, I have to go reread that trilogy now)
 
kookbreaker said:
The new reimaging shows that the Death Star explosion was an inside job.

'Chain Reaction Photon Torpedo theory' my butt!
Click to expand...

That just begs for its own web site and maybe even a video ala "Loose Change".

After all The Death Star was blown up by Vader's OWN SON. Explain THAT coincidence away, c'mon, I dare ya. And everyone knows that it is almost imposible to launch a missle down that tiny exhaust port.
 
Nyarlathotep said:
That just begs for its own web site and maybe even a video ala "Loose Change".

After all The Death Star was blown up by Vader's OWN SON. Explain THAT coincidence away, c'mon, I dare ya. And everyone knows that it is almost imposible to launch a missle down that tiny exhaust port.
Click to expand...
Yeah! That'd take some kind of magic torpedo, or a pilot who can psychically alter its course in mid-flight!
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
What we need to be asking though, is where was Admiral Thrawn during this. It is just too convenient that he was off fighting a "threat to the Empire" during this time.


(man, I have to go reread that trilogy now)
Click to expand...

He was busy foiling Grand Admiral Zaarin's rebellion against the Empire.
 
Nyarlathotep said:
That just begs for its own web site and maybe even a video ala "Loose Change".

After all The Death Star was blown up by Vader's OWN SON. Explain THAT coincidence away, c'mon, I dare ya. And everyone knows that it is almost imposible to launch a missle down that tiny exhaust port.
Click to expand...

Somewhere on the web there is a picture of the deathstar exploding but if you look closely you can see several smaller explosives going off around the outside.

PLUS!!! In later years the VERY SAME EXPLOSION looked completely different with a ring of fire and everything as they tried to hide even more evidence but I know earlier copies of the unedited explosion exists somewhere.
 
Nyarlathotep said:
After all The Death Star was blown up by Vader's OWN SON. Explain THAT coincidence away, c'mon, I dare ya. And everyone knows that it is almost imposible to launch a missle down that tiny exhaust port.
Click to expand...

Not really, I used to bulls-eye womp rats in my T-16 back home.

LLH
 
Nyarlathotep said:
That just begs for its own web site and maybe even a video ala "Loose Change".
Click to expand...

Hmmm. 'Loose Sabers'

After all The Death Star was blown up by Vader's OWN SON. Explain THAT coincidence away, c'mon, I dare ya. And everyone knows that it is almost imposible to launch a missle down that tiny exhaust port.
Click to expand...

Oh, yeah. And guess what, they allege that the last viable Jedi in the known Universe is on the scene as well. Guess they'll tell us next that they were the same person!

Everyone also knows it is against Sith tradition to wear shiney black. So obviously everything with Vader is faked.
 
conspiracybeliever said:
Can you explain why these "compression artifacts" only occur on the corners of the WTC 1 and 2 and no where else on the video?
Click to expand...
That's the place where the bright white can cause colourbleed into a darker area, making them noticeable. There probably are more pixels shifting, but there are large areas with similar colour making it difficult to notice. The compression artifacts don't occur only on the corners. I noticed some at the spire as well. And as Arkan_Wolfshade showed, in the text.

Can you explain why these explosions only occur in the areas where bright colours meet darker colours?

This conspiracy doesn't make sense to me. So we are supposed to think the conspirators planted gobs of explosives into the building and directed planes toward them. Why would they bother to set off the explosives first if they expect the planes? Surely a plane filled with highly combustible fuel hitting them will set them off just as effectively?
 
J. Arthur Hastur said:
So no one has a comment on what my structural engineer said? I told him I wasn't wasting his time.......................
Click to expand...
Well, it is kind of a "dog bites man" story - yet another structural engineer has no problem with the standard story that fires made the building fall. What would be remarkable is for anyone to find even one structural engineer who says that it had to be explosives.
 
kookbreaker said:
Everyone also knows it is against Sith tradition to wear shiney black. So obviously everything with Vader is faked.
Click to expand...

Well, the original mauve armor didn't exactly inspire fear. He would've had to choke people to death for days to earn some fear and or respect if they hadn't switched to black.
 
Hey Roxdog, here's a news story quote for you:
The blaze was still raging out of control in the early hours... Explosions could be heard within the building and authorities cordoned off a zone...
Click to expand...
Those words are from this story.

Oh wait - that story was about the Madrid Windsor Hotel fire. Since witnesses reported explosions, I guess this building was bombed too? Those dastardly Globalists!
 
I don't want to seem like a party pooper but all this noise cluttering up this thread only provides conspiracybeliever more opportunity to miss/ignore the good questions and research those who are serious about this subject have been posting.

This guy and this topic is serious, I would like to see him answer the posts by Luke, Manny, chipmunk stew, CurtC and the others. The "fun" noise just gives him an excuse to ignore them.

Thanks.


eta: Don't get me wrong, as a SW's fan, some of the stuff is pretty funny :D
 
Earthborn said:
That's the place where the bright white can cause colourbleed into a darker area, making them noticeable. There probably are more pixels shifting, but there are large areas with similar colour making it difficult to notice. The compression artifacts don't occur only on the corners. I noticed some at the spire as well. And as Arkan_Wolfshade showed, in the text.

Can you explain why these explosions only occur in the areas where bright colours meet darker colours?

This conspiracy doesn't make sense to me. So we are supposed to think the conspirators planted gobs of explosives into the building and directed planes toward them. Why would they bother to set off the explosives first if they expect the planes? Surely a plane filled with highly combustible fuel hitting them will set them off just as effectively?
Click to expand...
(My bolding) ... and why do these "explosions" take place several times in the same place and fail to throw off any ejecta or damage the building? In the Texas demolition you can see the explosions (which are yellow, not white) going off in sequence up the middle of the building - very different.

DavidJames - good point but I can also see that humour is a resonable response to idiocy on this scale.
 
Last edited:
CurtC said:
Well, it is kind of a "dog bites man" story - yet another structural engineer has no problem with the standard story that fires made the building fall. What would be remarkable is for anyone to find even one structural engineer who says that it had to be explosives.
Click to expand...

Shucks, and I was all excited to present his insight :D
 
Dragon said:
DavidJames - good point but I can also see that humour is a resonable response to idiocy on this scale.
Click to expand...

In fact, it more or less ILLUSTRATES the idiocy on this scale.

The fact that you can make arguments on the Death Star conspiracy that are more or less just as persuasive as those for the WTC tells you a lot about how easy it is to create these stories out of nothing.

It's like comparing the numerical coincidences in the Washington Monument to those in the pyramids. It shows how easy it is to do such things, thereby making the original claims less significant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom