My understanding is that Young Harlots (you link to its promotional front cover above) was licenced only after cuts; the full uncut version will be available on the internet to any UK citizen (which potentially amounts to a huge number of UK citizens who aren't being prosecuted for consuming CSAM).
The cuts I found to have been demanded to various Young Harlots porn DVDs were for going too hard at deep throating and for piss. Not for anything to do with the student roleplay angle. It's in the post you linked! Why do you argue in this way?
When a certificate is issued the BBFC publishes what cuts and changes were necessary for a movie to gain its certificate (if any).
I am saying I had a document listing the cuts that were demanded, and I reproduced the relevant parts in the thread, which you just quoted, and you have bupkis + insinuations.
From BBFC:
I don't see anyone looking, attempting to look, or pretending to look underage on that promotional front cover.
Right, but the BBFC's survey found that UK citizens were indeed seeing roleplay material that is illegal in the UK.
Different countries have different rules. In Australia it is considered CSAM. In the UK, though not strictly CSAM, it nevertheless carries the same sentence (up to 10 years).
Yes, yes. We already know it's not really about the CSAM; you just don't like porn in general. The only reason you're harping on CSAM is that you think it's the easiest sell to people who otherwise have no serious objection to porn. And the reason it's turning out to be a much harder sell than you imagined is because everybody knows that real CSAM is actually quite rare on mainstream porn sites, and everybody has noticed that you keep having to expand the definition to try to make your pitch. Exaggeration and misrepresentation only works when your audience doesn't know you're doing it.
Some of them clearly look underage - but the BBFC made no cuts in that respect so I was wrong.
Based on one video? Have already posted BBFC's acknowledgement that roleplay porn is easily available on mainstream websites and is illegal in the UK.
Which ones?
Based on your entire body of work so far in this thread. The sources you cite, the examples you give, the arguments you use, the questions you choose to answer and the answers you choose to give... It all adds up to the conclusion that you just don't like porn, don't respect people who do, and would prefer to see it all banned.
I have already posted the BBFC's acknowledgement of the prevalence of roleplay material easily available on the net that carries a sentence of up to 10 years in the UK. You continue to dodge that fact.
Rather than you infer that, what I have tried to do is draw attention to the negative impact porn is undoubtedly having on society. You think porn is probably harmful - but you have a hard time believing in anything much don't you?
Which of course is what you still have to show and quantify.
You don't answer my posts - posts clearly contradicting what you claim as truth.
None of the women in the bottom row look younger than 18 to me.
And so be honest about what you're actually trying to accomplish. Tell us what you want, and why, in plain language. Then do us the courtesy of letting us make up our own minds, instead of trying to browbeat, gaslight, and mislead us into accidentally agreeing with your unstated but poorly-hidden premises.