• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Arday life and death

None of this has any relevance to the topic under discussion. Cofnas investigated Arday and found him to be a cheat, a serial liar and a fraud. Those findings turn out to be verified truth. None of that changes just because Cofnas is a vile bastard.
True enough.

But I'm not going to take Vixen's word for it that Cofnas is a vile bastard. There's no reason to simply concede that as true. Vixen wants every benefit of the doubt extended to Arday, might as well use the same standard for Cofnas.
 
You commit two errors of fact here, both of which fall under the logical fallacy of the false premise.

Arday was not a DEI hire. In the UK the term is EDI and does not mean what you believe it means. You have been told that employment discrimination on grounds of race, sex, sexuality, disability or religion is illegal in the UK (England & Wales, Scotland and N.I.) under the Equality Act 1997 (IIRC - might have been updated since) so stop lying that 'Arday was a DEI-hire'. Get rid of your elementary false premise.
Bless your heart, Vixen. It's clear that Arday was hired not because of the content of his character, nor because of the contents of his CV, but because of the color of his skin. And yes, such hiring is supposed to be illegal. That's why I refer to it, colloquially, as a DEI hire.
Secondly, Cofnas was not the originator of the story, it was David Harris,
In that case,

Cofnas' research on race differences in intelligence is literally non-existent.
And yet his research on Arday's lack of qualifications and low character was spot on. So already it's looking like he's a better researcher than Arday was.
 
Intelligence research is in the field of Psychology. Cofnas has zero understanding of Statistics, either. Only a charlatan says the type of stuff he's come out with.
Do you happen to know if we have a thread about claims Cofnas has made by abusing statistics?

I'd be interested in that discussion as well as this one.
 
As already stated, institutions like Cambridge University have strict recruitment, processing and interview policies.
Haha oh wow.

Arday being a Black African does not follow that that is why he was hired.
Arday wasn't a Black African. He was a Black Englishman. He was born and raised in England. He was educated in English schools. Even if his parents made an effort to keep him connected to his Ghanian heritage, I doubt that heritage included plagiarism and fabulism among it values. He learned those things from his fellow Englishmen.
 
But you guys are forgetting an important axiom of the loony-left, progressive mindset... and that is, 'if anyone who says anything against any of their "chosen ones" has even just the slightest hint of something racist or right wing in their background, then nothing they ever say about anything can ever be trusted'.

Nathan Cofnas is a racist ◊◊◊◊, and an all round scummy individual. His bat-crap crazy ideas about genetically based relative intelligence between races is nothing short of of dog-whistle bigotry hiding under the guise of academic scholarship.

But the reality is, regardless of what a scummy individual Cosnas is, it doesn't mean he is wrong on this. It doesn't even matter is his motivation for investigating Arday was based in his bigotry, if what that investigation reveals turns out to be independently verified truth. Those truths don't magically go away just because the exposer or fact-finder turns out to be a vile prick!!
It reminds me of that scene in Heat, where Nate the fixer is telling Neil McCauley not to take too many risks. He reminds McCauley that Detective Hanna can hit or miss, when he goes out to catch a criminal. Maybe Hanna gets his man. Maybe he goes home empty-handed. Either way, tomorrow is a new day, and he can try gain. But McCauley? He can't afford to miss even once. He gets caught, he goes to prison. No going home and trying again the next day.

Now, Detective Hanna is a scumbag. He's a coke addict who poisons all of his personal relationships. He lives for the thrill of hunting down people like McCauley. But that doesn't change the fact that McCauley cannot afford to get caught by Hanna.

Similar thing here. In this metaphor, Cambridge is McCauley, perpetrating shenanigans and trying to get away with it. But there's always some scumbag out there, some racist prick who's just looking for an excuse to take them down. Cofnas can hit or miss, but Cambridge can't afford to miss even once. In this case, Cambridge's miss got someone killed.

If Cambridge actually did have strict hiring practices, they could have - should have! - circled the wagons, produced receipts, and done everything in their power to uphold Arday in the face of such baseless criticism.

In fact they did do everything in their power, which was nothing, because the criticism wasn't actually baseless.

You will do nothing, because you can do nothing.
- Viggo Tarasov
 
If Cambridge actually did have strict hiring practices, they could have - should have! - circled the wagons, produced receipts, and done everything in their power to uphold Arday in the face of such baseless criticism.

In fact they did do everything in their power, which was nothing, because the criticism wasn't actually baseless.

I think its worse than that

If anyone should be held responsible for his death (other than Arday himself) its Cambridge University. They are the ones who allowed their better judgement to be overridden by their left-wing, progressive virtue-signaling; their ideologically-driven obsession with DEI/EDI in order to be seen as the wokest of the woke.

They set Jason Arday up to fail, and then they abandoned him when he did.
 
It reminds me of that scene in Heat, where Nate the fixer is telling Neil McCauley not to take too many risks. He reminds McCauley that Detective Hanna can hit or miss, when he goes out to catch a criminal. Maybe Hanna gets his man. Maybe he goes home empty-handed. Either way, tomorrow is a new day, and he can try gain. But McCauley? He can't afford to miss even once. He gets caught, he goes to prison. No going home and trying again the next day.

Now, Detective Hanna is a scumbag. He's a coke addict who poisons all of his personal relationships. He lives for the thrill of hunting down people like McCauley. But that doesn't change the fact that McCauley cannot afford to get caught by Hanna.

Similar thing here. In this metaphor, Cambridge is McCauley, perpetrating shenanigans and trying to get away with it. But there's always some scumbag out there, some racist prick who's just looking for an excuse to take them down. Cofnas can hit or miss, but Cambridge can't afford to miss even once. In this case, Cambridge's miss got someone killed.

If Cambridge actually did have strict hiring practices, they could have - should have! - circled the wagons, produced receipts, and done everything in their power to uphold Arday in the face of such baseless criticism.

In fact they did do everything in their power, which was nothing, because the criticism wasn't actually baseless.

You will do nothing, because you can do nothing.
- Viggo Tarasov
Core concept: Offense only has to succeed some of the time; defense has to succeed all the time.
 
Don't bother. Vixen is clearly committed to the proposition that Arday was a pioneer in the field of education, doing research and publishing results that advanced the state of the art.
Such postmodernist concepts as jazz music and children's cartoons being the tools of the White OppressorTM ....🤣
 
I admit I subscribe to a rather archaic and idealized view of the academic degrees.

An associate's degree means you have some basic association with the material.

A bachelor's degree means you know enough to support yourself in the field.

A master's degree means you have mastered the current state of the art.

A Philosophy Doctor's degree means that you have progressed beyond mastery of the current state of the art, and you are extending that with new discoveries and proven ideas.

For Arday to have received a PhD says to me that he was either a thought leader in the field of education, or that he had been propped up as a symbol, regardless of his lack of qualifications.

@Vixen, what would you say is Arday's most important addition, to the existing body of knowledge about education?
 
At least middleman guy was acting as an interface between two components. Even if the interface function could have been transferred to the components in question.

There's no evidence Arday provided even that value, is there, @Vixen?
 
Such postmodernist concepts as jazz music and children's cartoons being the tools of the White OppressorTM ....🤣
To be fair, in case it wasn't clear from the video, it wasn't Arday himself who taught that nonsense. (He taught other nonsense:P) That was already the state of the sociology department at Cambridge before they hired Arday. It was already a circus, and Arday was just another clown they hired.
 
To be fair, in case it wasn't clear from the video, it wasn't Arday himself who taught that nonsense. (He taught other nonsense:P) That was already the state of the sociology department at Cambridge before they hired Arday. It was already a circus, and Arday was just another clown they hired.
Regardless, the vast majority of postmodernism is just bonkers garbage. I mean seriously, anthropologists should believe native tribes when they claim their magic is real and that they can fly? Really?

We are facing the same pseudo-intellectual claptrap here, where local wokesters are trying to get Māori myths and legends taught in science classes (under the guise of calling it “Māori Science”) and for it to be held up as of equal importance and validity with actual science such as physics and astronomy. They class the latter as “white man’s science”. No prizes for guessing which political parties are driving this nonsense… Labour and the Greens.

There is a thread about this somewhere
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom