Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

[JayUtah]

Anyway, I think this topic is exhausted.

…20 years ago.

 

[zooterkin]

Here we go:

Post in thread 'Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk'

Jul 22, 2026

Citation, please.

The question is could the simulations have been realistic enough to convince the general public and the mission controllers? The best evidence we have is from the people who were involved at the time. For example, the words of the Apollo 11 Flight Director Gene Kranz (also Flight Director for every odd-numbered Apollo mission): "The simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission”" (from "THE APOLLO MOON HOAX: THE REAL EVIDENCE : A REFERENCE GUIDE TO THE FACTS" by "Marcus Allen, Trevor Weaver").

• Vixen

• 

Now go back and read the responses following that, which explained, in detail, exactly why that didn't mean what you think it did.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Not if it's a 'live' tv broadcast.

If you had eyesight as good as a standard definition TV camera you would be considered severely visually impaired. Even if the exposure was not a problem, a TV picture would not resolve tiny background stars. It's a complete non-starter.

 

[Steve]

Anyway, I think this topic is exhausted.

It was exhausted months ago. The overwhelming evidence is that every Apollo moon landing actually happened. The only (very poor) arguments to the contrary are made by charlatans, imbeciles and trolls.

 

[threadworm]

Looks like the pigeon is leaving the chessboard...

 

[Steve]

Looks like the pigeon is leaving the chessboard...

Won't happen. The craving for attention is too strong.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

So now I am up to date.

Really? You are now claiming to have read and understood the information that's been posted in this thread? When did that change?

 

[Reformed Offlian]

Anyway, I think this topic is exhausted.

You are by far the slowest person in the discussion to realize this.

 

[Mojo]

It was exhausted months ago. The overwhelming evidence is that every Apollo moon landing actually happened. The only (very poor) arguments to the contrary are made by charlatans, imbeciles and trolls.

Looks like the pigeon is leaving the chessboard...

Won't happen. The craving for attention is too strong.

She doesn't mean the whole thread, just the "TET-RA" [sic] bit.*


*Until she needs it again as a distraction from some other failure.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Here we go:

Post in thread 'Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk'

Jul 22, 2026

Citation, please.

The question is could the simulations have been realistic enough to convince the general public and the mission controllers? The best evidence we have is from the people who were involved at the time. For example, the words of the Apollo 11 Flight Director Gene Kranz (also Flight Director for every odd-numbered Apollo mission): "The simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission”" (from "THE APOLLO MOON HOAX: THE REAL EVIDENCE : A REFERENCE GUIDE TO THE FACTS" by "Marcus Allen, Trevor Weaver").

• Vixen

• 

Which has what to do with the dishes tracking the moon?

The simulation was not of radio transmissions.

In the 80s I, like every other rating in the navy went through the ship firefighting and the damage control schools at HMS Raleigh.
They were identical to being aboard real ships in action, they even pitched and rolled.

Same with Ops Room and turret simulations at HMS Sultan and HMS Excellent.

Can you think why they were as near as possible identical to the real thing?

I know how good they were because about 9 months after completing the simulations I was doing it all for real in the South Atlantic.

 

[Trebuchet]

Looks like the pigeon is leaving the chessboard...

Won't happen. The craving for attention is too strong.

Happens about once a week, lasts a few days, repeat ad infinitum.

 

[Andy_Ross]

 

[Foster Zygote]

How is that à propos of anything, when the ISS is within Earth's atmosphere?

The ISS is within the thermosphere, which is for all intents and purposes a vacuum.

 

[Foster Zygote]

Not if it's a 'live' tv broadcast.

If it's "live", in quotes like that, that means it wasn't live. If it's faked then they planned it all out ahead of time, right?

 

[Foster Zygote]

Some guy at Houston said he couldn't tell the difference.

Some guy in Helsinki says you once ate a hedgehog you ran over with your car.

See how that works?

 

[Foster Zygote]

Mkay, but the denier argument is that it was simply beamed from the same place the guys did their training in the desert

You mean the desert that looks exactly like the environment seen in the Apollo television and photographic images?

 

[Reformed Offlian]

Not if it's a 'live' tv broadcast.

Wait, so now we're supposed to be seeing stars in the *tv* broadcasts? When and how was that supposed to happen?

 

[Reformed Offlian]

The ISS is within the thermosphere, which is for all intents and purposes a vacuum.

Just for funsies, let's see if Vixen knows what the temperature of the thermosphere is. How is that poor French woman able to survive for even a few seconds?!

 

[EHocking]

A view of the August 12 solar eclipse as seen from South Korea's Danuri satellite, in orbit around the Moon.

View attachment 74726

Obviously fake,

FYI the earth always looks blue when viewed from the Moon.

 

[junkshop]

Anyway, I think this topic is exhausted.

How convenient.