• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

Vixen said:
Herewith, as you requested.

View attachment 74491
Click to expand...
So your source/citation for an image being an "official NASA photograph", is that you read and trusted the autogenerated description on a Google search, for an image that was obviously AI generated, and which everyone else in the discussion instantly recognised as AI?

You're too lazy to even visit the website the image came from and check the source/description? Or to track down the actual original on NASA's or another suitable website?

Lazy, low-effort, oblivious slop. Par for the course for conspiracy theorists. Especially when combined with continual boasts about being the smartest person in the room. What is it with conspiracy theorists having to continually tell everyone else just how darn smart they are, instead of actually just demonstrating how darn smart they are?
 
Last edited:
JesseCuster said:
So your source/citation for an image being an "official NASA photograph", is that you read and trusted the autogenerated description on a Google search, for an image that was obviously AI generated, and which everyone else in the discussion instantly recognised as AI?

You're too lazy to even visit the website the image came from and check the source/description? Or to track down the actual original on NASA's or another suitable website?

Lazy, low-effort, oblivious slop. Par for the course for conspiracy theorists. Especially when combined with continual boasts about being the smartest person in the room. What is it with conspiracy theorists having to continually tell everyone else just how darn smart they are, instead of actually just demonstrating how darn smart they are?
Click to expand...
Vixen has form for just looking at whatever is at the top of her Google results and taking that as gospel.
 
Carrot Flower King said:
Well, I do my best, but I only studied the "stamp collecting" sciences, according to pretty much every physicist I've met, including Nephew #1 (nephew #2 is a medic, so he is told to sod off)...
Click to expand...

My Nephew #1 did a degree in physics (I was so proud) then became a teacher (also good) at a private school (eeehhhhhhb) that gave him so many retention benefits you would not ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ believe (good for him) then he quit and became an actuary for one of the Big Four. FFS.

Oh, and eclipse over, it got darker, but it's surprising how much light 4% of the Sun provides. On the bright side, having the only pair of eclipse viewing glasses on the block led to us meeting some of our neighbours we hadn't met before.
 
A slight dimming here on the North Yorkshire coast.
As you say it's surprising how little actual sun is needed for daylight.

Same as in 99 when we watched that eclipse outside our office building on New Oxford Street.
 
Steve said:
"We", your majesty? You have been informed of no such thing, You have amply demonstrated a complete inability to understand any of the myriad evidence that has been posted here showing that the moon landings - all of them - actually happened. Your mind is so completely bunged up with numerous conspiracies that you cannot comprehend reality.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, this post epitomises how people no longer debate. They just see anyone holding a different view as an arch enemy. Instead of presenting their reasoning we see insult hurling by the bucket load. For example, say we had a topic 'Royal Family ~vs~ its abolition'. Now, it's quite possible to be strongly in favour of one side or the other, presenting one's case, without resorting to coercion and insistence that only you are right. It's understandable as it can cause anxiety in some people who might feel a core value is under threat. But it's not! A fact cannot be changed however much one might hate it or fear it.
 
Last edited:
Andy_Ross said:
Why would stars be visible in a photo exposed to show details on a daylight earth?
Click to expand...

Vixen said:
FYI the earth always looks blue when viewed from the Moon.
Click to expand...
This does not address or answer Andy's question, even remotely.

Why do you continually quote people's posts, only to answer some question or notion that exists only in your head?

You were asked why stars would be visible on a photograph properly exposed to show the daylit earth, and your response is that "the earth always look blue from the moon?"

Are you even aware of how disconnected from the posts you quote your own posts so frequently are? For example, the post you're going to respond to this with is not going to actually address what I'm saying at all.
 
Vixen said:
Unfortunately, this post epitomises how people no longer debate.
Click to expand...
You're not debating. You're winding people up to get them to pay attention to you.

Vixen said:
It's understandable as it can cause anxiety in some people who might feel a core value is under threat.
Click to expand...
No, people are not anxious because their core values are upset. Instead, people are showing you facts you don't know, and rightly treating you as a child because of your bad behavior in the face of those facts.

Vixen said:
A fact cannot be changed however much one might hate it or fear it.
Click to expand...
How long does it take to expose stars on ISO 160 film?

Vixen said:
FYI the earth always looks blue when viewed from the Moon.
Click to expand...
See the ham-fisted dodges you have to resort to when the facts are squarely against you?
 
Last edited:
Vixen said:
Unfortunately, this post epitomises how people no longer debate. They just see anyone holding a different view as an arch enemy. Instead of presenting their reasoning we see insult hurling by the bucket load. For example, say we had a topic 'Royal Family ~vs~ its abolition'. Now, it's quite possible to be strongly in favour of one side or the other, presenting one's case, without resorting to coercion and insistence that only you are right. It's understandable as it can cause anxiety in some people who might feel a core value is under threat. But it's not! A fact cannot be changed however much one might hate it or fear it.
Click to expand...
"Debate" from ignorance merely makes you look foolish. You frequently refer to facts bur you posts are uniformly devoid of them. When you start presenting scientifically supported facts when discussing science knowledgeable people might engage with you at an adult level.
 
I saw the 1999 eclipse in Brixham - we drove down the M4 especially for it - got the t-shirt, done that. In Brixham, Torbay, Devon, there was a MASSIVE crowd. Today, there was a 'crowd' of ... just eight of us. The view from Finland was just an 80% partial eclipse and had an azimuth of 294°WNW. 10° above the horizon at the start to 4° by the time of maximum effect.
 
Steve said:
"Debate" from ignorance merely makes you look foolish. You frequently refer to facts bur you posts are uniformly devoid of them. When you start presenting scientifically supported facts when discussing science knowledgeable people might engage with you at an adult level.
Click to expand...
You only assume it's ignorance because you can't conceive that people are capable of complex ideas.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom