Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

[Reformed Offlian]

Phoning it in, I see.

But not via radio link, because that would be silly.

 

[Vixen]

All the substantive responses to your posts over the last couple of days, and THAT is what you choose to respond to and say about it?

Pathetic.

So now I am up to date. We just need to wait to compare and contrast how the Chinese crews do the Moon.

 

[Steve]

Mkay, but the denier argument is that it was simply beamed from the same place the guys did their training in the desert

Is that your argument?

 

[Steve]

Some guy at Houston said he couldn't tell the difference.

"some guy"

 

[Vixen]

Yet the "some guys" at any tracking station could. Houston didn't generally get its signals directly from space, but Goldstone did, as did Honeysuckle Creek, Jodrell Bank, and every other tracking station around the world.

Jodrell bank was a US ally, it didn't need to 'track', it just got its info from Houston. We had this discussion already.

 

[Steve]

So now I am up to date. We just need to wait to compare and contrast how the Chinese crews do the Moon.

Why?

 

[Vixen]

"some guy"

You can use the search function if you are actually interested in his name.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Some guy at Houston said he couldn't tell the difference.

How was he listening to them? was he pointing an antenna himself or just getting a feed?

Do you think the people operating the dishes around the globe tracking Apollo couldn't tell?

 

[Andy_Ross]

Mkay, but the denier argument is that it was simply beamed from the same place the guys did their training in the desert

To the dishes pointing at and tracking the moon ?

 

[Steve]

You use can use the search function if you are actually interested in his name.

Oh no. "some guy" is exactly the standard of expertise you reference.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Not if it's a 'live' tv broadcast.

Why not?

 

[Andy_Ross]

Jodrell bank was a US ally, it didn't need to 'track', it just got its info from Houston. We had this discussion already.

It's dish was pointing at the moon.

 

[Andy_Ross]

You can use the search function if you are actually interested in his name.

It's your claim, you should support it.

 

[Reformed Offlian]

Jodrell bank was a US ally, it didn't need to 'track', it just got its info from Houston. We had this discussion already.

Yes, and I explained to you why this suggestion is ignorant and silly.

Jodrell Bank got its data from its own telescopes. Are you saying that Jodrell Bank wouldn't be able to tell if they were getting signals from their own telescopes?

 

[Mojo]

Jodrell bank was a US ally, it didn't need to 'track', it just got its info from Houston. We had this discussion already.

Yes, and it was demonstrated that you were wrong about it.

 

[Vixen]

How was he listening to them? was he pointing an antenna himself or just getting a feed?

Do you think the people operating the dishes around the globe tracking Apollo couldn't tell?

Here we go:

Post in thread 'Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk'

Jul 22, 2026

Citation, please.

The question is could the simulations have been realistic enough to convince the general public and the mission controllers? The best evidence we have is from the people who were involved at the time. For example, the words of the Apollo 11 Flight Director Gene Kranz (also Flight Director for every odd-numbered Apollo mission): "The simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission”" (from "THE APOLLO MOON HOAX: THE REAL EVIDENCE : A REFERENCE GUIDE TO THE FACTS" by "Marcus Allen, Trevor Weaver").

• Vixen

• 

 

[Jack by the hedge]

To beam images from wherever the alleged simulation is being transmitted.

The simulations were not being transmitted. Receiving radio signals from the moon was not the thing being rehearsed in the simulations. I think you have a misunderstanding of what the simulated exercises were.

 

[Vixen]

Anyway, I think this topic is exhausted.

 

[Mojo]

Here we go:

Post in thread 'Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk'

Jul 22, 2026

Citation, please.

The question is could the simulations have been realistic enough to convince the general public and the mission controllers? The best evidence we have is from the people who were involved at the time. For example, the words of the Apollo 11 Flight Director Gene Kranz (also Flight Director for every odd-numbered Apollo mission): "The simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission”" (from "THE APOLLO MOON HOAX: THE REAL EVIDENCE : A REFERENCE GUIDE TO THE FACTS" by "Marcus Allen, Trevor Weaver").

• Vixen

• 

Your reading comprehension skills have let you down again.

 

[JayUtah]

Here we go:

Asked and answered.