JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
Quite a few. Identifying, quantifying, and integrating them into a solution was the exercise. For the values we settled on, peeing yourself off the asteroid was possible.I assume there were a few givens...
Quite a few. Identifying, quantifying, and integrating them into a solution was the exercise. For the values we settled on, peeing yourself off the asteroid was possible.I assume there were a few givens...
Use the crevice tool attachment...

Use the crevice tool attachment, not the upholstery brush.
We did an exercise once for our high school interns, years ago. The educational goal was requirements gathering and analysis. But the question to be solved was whether you could pee hard enough to propel yourself to escape velocity from an asteroid (assuming you could magically survive the vacuum). After the inevitable sniggering I was surprised at how passionately they attacked the problem. Nerds are gonna nerd. Nowadays, of course, you can't teach that way.
The nozzle sometimes gets stuck.I'm assuming it would be really hard to not fart in a vacuum.
You can also try to flap your arms and fly to the Moon. 180 is still outside the statistical model. I.Q. can be increased by education, but not by that much.You can also try to raise your level to 180 points.
Do you have any IQ test results for him?Einstein could even score above 300 points even though his base IQ was 160 points.
So if there's a "base I.Q.," you're saying there's some other kind of I.Q. that lets you score 300 or higher?Einstein could even score above 300 points even though his base IQ was 160 points.
His high IQ, over 300, is related to changes in the structure of the braincase.So if there's a "base I.Q.," you're saying there's some other kind of I.Q. that lets you score 300 or higher?
How did he change the structure of his braincase?His high IQ, over 300, is related to changes in the structure of the braincase.
It was an innate trait.How did he change the structure of his braincase?
You claim that his innate IQ was 160. How did he change the structure of his braincase to elevate it to 300?It was an innate trait.
No, his "base I.Q." (your words) was estimated to be around 160. This was never measured, but it was estimated so as to be on the same scale as the N(100,15) scale. If "base I.Q." is the one based on the normed scale, then what is the statistical or mathematical basis for the I.Q. score that according to you gives him a score of 300?His high IQ, over 300, is related to changes in the structure of the braincase.
Then I have to join my colleagues to ask how it can be changed then? Your premise is that we can change our I.Q. dramatically by hundreds of points. You refuse to tell us how to do that. Do you achieve your claimed 1600 I.Q. by altering your brain case? Is your 1600 score innate or is it mutable?It was an innate trait.
Do you really doubt whether altering @wise47's brain case would change his IQ?Then I have to join my colleagues to ask how it can be changed then? Your premise is that we can change our I.Q. dramatically by hundreds of points. You refuse to tell us how to do that. Do you achieve your claimed 1600 I.Q. by altering your brain case? Is your 1600 score innate or is it mutable?
Do you really doubt whether altering @wise47's brain case would change his IQ?
He might have used a hammer.