Mojo
Mostly harmless
Here's the 'joke' in question:It wasn't a joke. At least not one you intended to make. You seemed pretty serious when you were sharing illustrative accounts of someone dying young of bone cancer, and someone else having a child born with a birth defect that you suggested could have been a result of exposure to radioactive samples. Or are you in the habit of including such anecdotes in your jokes?
ETA: Incidentally, Vixen, do you have any examples of non-congenital birth defects?OK, so the frogmen sprayed the capsule with 'chemicals' to 'kill the Moon germs'. Then they sloshed the astronauts inside with same. They got them to change clothes in case of 'Moon germs'. Are you serious?! Not a single mention of the extremely dangerous possibility of radiation..?
An older sibling and a friend as part of their (British) degrees, spent a year at Grenoble Uni in which they spent time with radioactivematerials (Chemistry course). After EVERY session they had to undergo intensive decontamination and scrub downs. I can't remember the exact details now. This would have been a similar era - early to mid-70's - so you can't argue the dangers of radiation weren't known then. The thing is, the friend subsequently died young of bone cancer, still in 30's or 40's with small children, so it was incredibly sad. A child of my sibling was born with a birth defect, possibly congenital, and thankfully, easily rectified by surgery. Now, of course, we don't know it was because of the time spent at Grenoble but for NASA to believe 'germs' are the main problem makes me realise it's not serious. Spraying with chemicals indeed.
Well, that's one debating point.
Last edited: