Steve
Penultimate Amazing
Her own, of course.Which uneducated guess are you talking about?
Her own, of course.Which uneducated guess are you talking about?
Ektachrome was chosen because it was the fastest available. Compared to Kodachrome film it's less demanding to shoot and develop.
Maybe you should explain why you keep insisting that a satellite was required?So, now that we are all on the same page, tell us which satellite was used to beam TV images to earth, and whilst you are busy, the logistical steps by which to set it up for that exact time and place.
??Stop bringing in your ubiquitous explains-all radio waves.
Used that for my Mamiya 645 1000S. Donated it a neighborhood PD when I retired. Their budget didn't allow for any high quality gear. (Small town Indiana. The local cop car was a 1957 Cheverolet.)Ektachrome was chosen because it was the fastest available. Compared to Kodachrome film it's less demanding to shoot and develop.
It was also on a stable, polyester-based ESTAR base
Vixen, Vixen, Vixen, you never fail to disappoint. We can always count on you for one more mind-numbingly stupid comment.Stop bringing in your ubiquitous explains-all radio waves.
I see you looked up the slang term for the control stick after I noted your use of "gear stick". And, once again with feeling, the engine wasn't shut down until Aldrin called out "contact", when they were literally just a few feet above the surface, A couple of seconds before touchdown.Many a true word...
Actually Armstrong moved his joystick (settle down at the back) to avoid landing in a crater, the engine having been switched off, and Buzz reading out the altitudes, as though landing a fighter jet.
No wonder it's every little kiddies' dream.
Yes it is.That is not the correct logic.
Not if you express relative brightness as a percentage instead of a magnitude. A percentage is a ratio. That's fundamental. It's something all "numbers people" know.Brightness, like sound, is based on magnitude...
Except you confirmed via Google that yours was the wrong thought process.That was my thought process and not 'simple linear maths' as you claim.
It's TETR-A, and no, Bart Sibrel doesn't know what he's talking about.So, are you confirming NASA did use TETRA...?
In VixenworldTM light doesn't travel in straight lines.Why would they need a satellite? Just point your antena back at earth, and press the send button.
Relativity and all that.In VixenworldTM light doesn't travel in straight lines.
You will also need to adjust your camera's contrast setting to account for the effects of moon radiation...I don't know why everyone is confused. It's simply a matter of travelling 250,000K miles in your thin-walled aluminium capsule, setting up your dusty old Hasselblad in the pitch black of a crater on the side of the Moon that has never had any sunlight, move the gearr stick around a little bit to adjust the settings provided by the Ektachrome bods for the magnitude of your camera lens, and have the photos relayed to earth on a non-GEO positioned satellite.
Kemo sabe?
??
You do know that satellites communicate using radio waves, right?
So you want to talk about communications satellites without anyone mentioning radio waves?Stop bringing in your ubiquitous explains-all radio waves.
So you want to talk about communications satellites without anyone mentioning radio waves?
Radios receive old-fashioned radio signals. TVs receive TV signals. Satellites use satellite signals. It's quite technical.So you want to talk about communications satellites without anyone mentioning radio waves?
For the same reason that you need the Hubble Telescope to see the moon. It's just basic EM physics.There is direct line of sight from the Moon to the Earth.
Why would a satellite be needed?
Radios receive old-fashioned radio signals. TVs receive TV signals. Satellites use satellite signals. It's quite technical.