Isn't that what was said?I think the disguise is, in fact, a Hitler moustache.
Isn't that what was said?I think the disguise is, in fact, a Hitler moustache.
That's a surprise, because we can deport foreigners convicted of a crime no problem, usually after time served. And Ireland is subject to the same ECHR rules as the UK is.Darren Grimes
@darrengrimes
We are being treated like mugs.
We cannot deport an illegal foreign criminal because of the ECHR and the Egyptian death penalty. Quite frankly, I couldn’t care less if these twisted animals suffer in Egypt—that is not the victims' or Britain’s problem.
We are forced to host and fund people who despise us because a foreign court says their "rights" matter more than our safety. The ECHR is a shield for the depraved and a shackle for the British public. It’s time to leave.![]()
Can you deport someone to a country where they will likely face the death penalty?That's a surprise, because we can deport foreigners convicted of a crime no problem, usually after time served. And Ireland is subject to the same ECHR rules as the UK is.
That was the joke, yes.Isn't that what was said?
There's also complete twats Rupe.Restore Britain
@RestoreBritain_
Restore Britain would repeal the Gender Recognition Act.
There are men, and there are women.
That is all.
We used to go to the pub on a Friday lunch time, and return to operate dangerous machinery, back in the late 80s early 90s.Lightweight! Back in the '80s, it was still entirely normal to go to the pub at lunchtime for a couple of pints and the return to the office to write some extremely dodgy code. Usually on a Friday, but some folks managed it on other days too. And at least two of the places I worked at had bars on site. As in many things, Farage, and the HoC, are stuck in the past.
Portugal seem to be making a good fist of it.Well. Allowing medics to prescribe heroin and crack cocaine to medics is entirely consistent with saying that too many MPs are drunks and drink on the job, which is incredibly easy in Parliament.
And from my one experience of having a half of bitter with a Friday lunch at a local pub during my master's work and then really struggling in the lab for the rest of the afternoon, it l probably is true that too many MPs are drinking at work.
I disagree with how far they are proposing towards legalisation of drugs (for example making GHB available in specialist pharmacies for adults to use recreationally, which I can imagine would make spiking drinks easier) but putting Heroin and crack cocaine available on prescription is a plausible approach to reducing the harms from the drugs to both the addicts and the wider society.
(Yes, the article is older than I'd like, but as far as I know, the data is still valid.)Since it decriminalised all drugs in 2001, Portugal has seen dramatic drops in overdoses, HIV infection and drug-related crime.
Link
In the 90s I was working for an Apple Service Provider and dealership, mainly involved with publishing and digital media.Lightweight! Back in the '80s, it was still entirely normal to go to the pub at lunchtime for a couple of pints and the return to the office to write some extremely dodgy code. Usually on a Friday, but some folks managed it on other days too. And at least two of the places I worked at had bars on site. As in many things, Farage, and the HoC, are stuck in the past.
Well I guess that if you are in a couple receiving £50k in benefits, including PIP, there are probably quite severe disabilities involved.Lee Anderson MP
@LeeAndersonMP_
Just throwing this one out there as I was asked this question earlier today.
A couple both working with a combined income of £50,000 would pay £11,500 a year in income tax and national insurance,
Another couple receiving £50,000 in benefits including Universal Credit, Personal Independent Payment, Housing Benefit, Income Support and Child Benefit would pay no income tax or national insurance, keeping the full £50,000.
Should the non-working couple on £50,000 a year pay the same amount of income tax and national insurance as the working couple?
Lee Anderson MP
@LeeAndersonMP_
Just throwing this one out there as I was asked this question earlier today.
A couple both working with a combined income of £50,000 would pay £11,500 a year in income tax and national insurance,
Another couple receiving £50,000 in benefits including Universal Credit, Personal Independent Payment, Housing Benefit, Income Support and Child Benefit would pay no income tax or national insurance, keeping the full £50,000.
Should the non-working couple on £50,000 a year pay the same amount of income tax and national insurance as the working couple?
Nicely putThis question is fundamentally the same as asking if someone receiving a course of cancer treatment costing the NHS £100,000 deserves to be given £100,000 when you're not.
I would have thought a tooth brush moustache to be somewhat thinner.Isn't that what was said?
Depends on what for.Can you deport someone to a country where they will likely face the death penalty?
I would have called a thin one a pencil moustache. Anyway, Adolf was who I was alluding to.I would have thought a tooth brush moustache to be somewhat thinner.