• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's promised ICE raids have begun

He watched her, indeed he videoed her, turning her steering wheel hard over to the right and away from him before moving off, then he shot her, initially through the windscreen, but later shots were through the open side window. As the shot through the front screen was low down it is very unlikely to be the reported head shot. So it appears he shot the woman in the head through the open side window of her car.

I really cannot see the Trump administration managing to gaslight everyone sufficiently to keep this obviously unlawful killing out of court.
Not if normal people return to power, and if there's enough evidence left to convict.
 
Meanwhile here is proof that ICE is sending the very best!

 
No investigation or trial needed, the verdict is in.

TAPPER: You called Renee Good a "domestic terrorist" shortly after the shooting. Why did you not wait for an investigation?

KRISTI NOEM: Everything I've said has been proven to be factual and the truth. This administration wants to operate in transparency.

TAPPER: What you said is not what happened

NOEM: It absolutely is what happened

I wish somebody would just call her out to her face in front of millions of viewers. "Do you really think that viewers watching this interview are that stupid? Do you think that my audience is made up entirely of idiots? It's clear that you think that. The only people who believe you are the MAGA idiots. And you clearly have your head jammed so far up the president's ass that you can hardly breathe. Now get the ◊◊◊◊ out of here! Go home and shoot some more dogs."
 
Not if normal people return to power, and if there's enough evidence left to convict.

Minus the CSI effect, the witnesses and video amount to at least as much evidence as 99% of convictions in history. What's his defense, she was killed by a particularly vicious mosquito in the car that he was trying to defend her from and as the bullets have been 'lost' no-one can prove otherwise?
 
I wish somebody would just call her out to her face in front of millions of viewers. "Do you really think that viewers watching this interview are that stupid? Do you think that my audience is made up entirely of idiots? It's clear that you think that. The only people who believe you are the MAGA idiots. And you clearly have your head jammed so far up the president's ass that you can hardly breathe. Now get the ◊◊◊◊ out of here!
Go home and shoot some more dogs."

Please don't.
 
Auchincloss: "When you have a badge and a gun and you are interacting with a US citizen who has committed no crime, the onus of responsibility is on you to exercise good judgment and to use that weapon only as an absolute last resort. Nobody watching that video will buy the argument from that ICE agent that he had no other resort other than to shoot her in the face three times."

 
He was just doing what he was trained to do.

Tapper: What is the reason for the second and third shot through the window when he's not in the line of sight of the car?

Noem: What I would appreciate is everybody sticking to the facts of the situation and recognize that this law enforcement officer took action based on his training to protect himself and the public.

 
He was just doing what he was trained to do.

Tapper: What is the reason for the second and third shot through the window when he's not in the line of sight of the car?

Noem: What I would appreciate is everybody sticking to the facts of the situation and recognize that this law enforcement officer took action based on his training to protect himself and the public.


It seems to have been similar to that John Cleese was giving on how to defend yourself against someone armed with a small piece of fruit. But without being armed with the fruit.
 
He was just doing what he was trained to do.

Tapper: What is the reason for the second and third shot through the window when he's not in the line of sight of the car?

Noem: What I would appreciate is everybody sticking to the facts of the situation and recognize that this law enforcement officer took action based on his training to protect himself and the public.


Did she just admit to having ultimate responsibility for an agency which trains its officers to shoot people while they're operating a vehicle or is she, in fact, just a barefaced liar?
 
Last edited:
He was just doing what he was trained to do.

Tapper: What is the reason for the second and third shot through the window when he's not in the line of sight of the car?

Noem: What I would appreciate is everybody sticking to the facts of the situation and recognize that this law enforcement officer took action based on his training to protect himself and the public.

See, Jake? Here’s a perfect spot where you can earn a little of that seven-figure income. I’ll even help you out:

Secretary Noem, that in no way, shape or form answers my straightforward question. Would it help if I asked again? Rephrased it? Gave you a couple hours to rack your brain?

Don’t continue on until she answers! She’s a public ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ servant who, while being offered a measure of respect, still needs to answer to the people through, in this instance, your role as an intermediary! That’s your job! To question her on the performance of hers!
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom