It's hard to say that's good news when it's the result of things so long, drawn out, reprehensible, and should never have happened in the first place.
Beeb is reporting that the CPS is considering charges of corporate manslaughter over deaths of post masters caught up in the Horizon bollocks.
Watch this space, as this is going to get very interesting.
Good. They can start with the Vennels woman. Also, go after former Post Office General Counsel, Jane MacLeod, who fled to Australia to avoid consequences. A criminal charge of corporate manslaughter will open the door to extradition to face those charges.Beeb is reporting that the CPS is considering charges of corporate manslaughter over deaths of post masters caught up in the Horizon bollocks.
Watch this space, as this is going to get very interesting.
You have zero chance of getting the lawyer, they were doing their job as a lawyer advising their client, do you think that a legal system run by lawyers would ever allow a lawyer to be prosecuted because of the crimes of their client?Good. They can start with the Vennels woman. Also, go after former Post Office General Counsel, Jane MacLeod, who fled to Australia to avoid consequences. A criminal charge of corporate manslaughter will open the door to extradition to face those charges.
They were an employee of the post office, not a retained solicitor, which means their liability is tied into their employer's liability. Not of course that will make any difference and sadly I have to agree with your conclusion.You have zero chance of getting the lawyer, they were doing their job as a lawyer advising their client, do you think that a legal system run by lawyers would ever allow a lawyer to be prosecuted because of the crimes of their client?
To be clear, I am not arguing about the morality, just the practicality.
When a lawyer is a participant in a criminal conspiracy with their client, that pierces the lawyer/client privilege - the shield they have from prosecution evaporates. This is called the "Crime-Fraud Exception to Privilege"... Legal professional privilege (LPP) does not apply to communications made to further an ongoing or future crime or fraud. Lawyers are not permitted to advise clients to engage in illegal conduct, nor can they assist clients in violating the law. This includes avoiding misleading the court or being complicit in a client's acts or omissions.You have zero chance of getting the lawyer, they were doing their job as a lawyer advising their client, do you think that a legal system run by lawyers would ever allow a lawyer to be prosecuted because of the crimes of their client?
It will probably infuriate you.Inspired by the bumping of this thread, I just started watching Mr Bates vs the Post Office on Prime. Only 30 min but it looks good, I'll continue watching as I do my morning pedaling.
I'm not too surprised that it was known. I was at a Christmas lunch with some ex-colleagues last week, all working in IT, and one of them mentioned that the problems were known by the programming team quite early; the errors were very rare, but the vast number of daily transactions meant that the effects mounted up. My source wasn't in the team, but had heard from someone who was. Given that we're in the Thames Valley, it's quite believable that they heard this (I used to work in what is now the Fujitsu headquarters, though I left well before Horizon development started).Breaking - Channel 4 are reporting show a contract (?) between the Post Office and Fujitsu showing that both knew that the Horizon system was error prone and that the system could be changed remotely. It is dated while, and before, postmasters were being prosecuted.
I believe it's fairly truthful overall, although the one part of the programme I have any knowledge of is Fujitsu HQ, which is shown as a modern, almost futuristic, building, with lots of shiny glass. In fact it's a late 60s brutalist concrete tower.Inspired by the bumping of this thread, I just started watching Mr Bates vs the Post Office on Prime. Only 30 min but it looks good, I'll continue watching as I do my morning pedaling.
BBC article confirming this:Breaking - Channel 4 are reporting show a contract (?) between the Post Office and Fujitsu showing that both knew that the Horizon system was error prone and that the system could be changed remotely. It is dated while, and before, postmasters were being prosecuted.
The Post Office and Fujitsu agreed a deal 19 years ago to fix transaction errors in sub-postmasters' accounts caused by bugs in the Horizon IT system, a document has revealed.
An agreement was in place in 2006 for errors caused by bugs in the software to be corrected, or for Fujitsu to pay the Post Office up to £150 per transaction if it failed to do so.
And the answer is that since both the Post Office and Fujitsu lied consistently and presented false evidence.Nigel says it's Starmer's fault.
Nigel Farage MP
@Nigel_Farage
The Horizon scandal is getting worse for Keir Starmer as it emerges that at least 27 cases against subpostmasters were brought by the CPS.
As the scandal grew, and hundreds of innocent people were convicted, he did nothing. Time for some answers
Maybe I've spent too much time back in France over recent years but I'm itching to see heads on spikes.These last posts show that people really need prison time