catsmate
No longer the 1
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 34,767
And yet you keep dragging in USAia.We are talking about England, not Sweden.
And yet you keep dragging in USAia.We are talking about England, not Sweden.
We are talking about England, not Sweden.
Just not a rational one from a certain USAian.Kool. Whatever. I came in here here for an argument.
FTFY. My argument is extremely rational.Just not a rational one from a certainUSAian.AMERICAN
Just not a rational one from a certain USAian.
A uniquely colonial definition of rational, perhaps.FTFY. My argument is extremely rational.
He repetitively ignores the idea that the USAian version of "free speech" cannot be perfect.I was hoping for a professional arguer, actually. But I expect I would have to pay in that case, so swings and roundabouts, I suppose.
NS is still a colony, bud.A uniquely colonial definition of rational, perhaps.
FTFY.He repetitively ignores the idea that theUSAianAMERICAN version of "free speech" cannot be perfect.
Not how that word works.FTFY.
Never said it was perfect. But it's definitely more perfect than yours.
And it works.To create a disincentive to harassing women at abortion clinics.
Don't let him get within 500'.How the ◊◊◊◊ do you prevent someone from throwing a rock at a abortion clinic window, if you don't know he is carrying a rock in his pocket until he takes it out to throw it?
Schrödinger's Protestor. How do you know whether someone plans to be civil or uncivil when they attend an anti-abortion protest?We are talking about all anti-abortion protesters, both civil and uncivil.
You realise that you're just encouraging them to do it more, right?FTFY.
You're exemplifying it.Not the Americans I know.
Why? Other than your opinion....FTFY.
Never said it was perfect. But it's definitely more perfect than yours.
Maybe Steve needs to consult Tom Cruise and the three pre-cogs.Hercules56 - "First let them commit a crime by harassing the clinic's users, then arrest them when the damage has been done." This results in both harassment and arrests. Harassment that you sometimes claim should not happen, and sometimes require it to happen.
Steve - "Provide a reasonable level of protection for the clinic's users prior to any crime being committed." This reduces the chances of a crime being committed and results in no harassment and no arrests - a better result for all concerned, users and protesters alike.
Um, haven’t you been hectoring people that this thread is not about America. Or perhaps it is not about America when you dislike comments about your pathetic country.Yes, the AMERICAN version of free speech, which is pretty damn good.
???Maybe Steve needs to consult Tom Cruise and the three pre-cogs.
《Nvm, it seems I butt posted, for what may be my first time. Poetic that my butt demanded freedom of speech ITT》
Exactly. That's basically what they are demanding. We must stop all crime before it happens, all criminal speech before its heard.Maybe Steve needs to consult Tom Cruise and the three pre-cogs.
No. You're repeating the same strawman over and over again; this doesn't make it trueExactly. That's basically what they are demanding. We must stop all crime before it happens, all criminal speech before its heard.