In the Uk it's a citizen's right.In America, Freedom of Speech is a govt issue.
In the Uk it's a citizen's right.In America, Freedom of Speech is a govt issue.
Which is more acceptable - milkshake or tomato soup?
It is when he says it is. Otherwise, when presented with a conflict in his own statements his only response is to tell posters that the thread is about the UK.You just proved me right that you're focusing on the wrong things, because this thread isn't about US law.
Interesting.In the Uk it's a citizen's right.
Certainly not as it relates to displaying their nation's flag. If you find it unbelievable that displaying their own nation's flag doesn't provide any plausible means to determine whether a person is or is not a racist, you might want to give the topic a wee bit more thought.You have no way to determine if someone is a racist? I find that quite unbelievable!
I can't parse this in light of the full exchange.Certainly not as it relates to displaying their nation's flag. If you find it unbelievable that displaying their own nation's flag doesn't provide any plausible means to determine whether a person is or is not a racist, you might want to give the topic a wee bit more thought.
Certainly not as it relates to displaying their nation's flag. If you find it unbelievable that displaying their own nation's flag doesn't provide any plausible means to determine whether a person is or is not a racist, you might want to give the topic a wee bit more thought.
We considered Al-Qaeda an enemy of the UK when they committed 9/11 even though that wasn't an attack on us.
Don't they?
Allow me to help you out:I can't parse this in light of the full exchange.
You have no way to determine if someone is a racist? I find that quite unbelievable!That's a non-answer, Darat. It's damned close to admitting that there's no actual basis for determining when it is and when it is not racism, and it allows malicious assumptions that inflame the public.The same way we all do.If it's only seen as racism when it's being used by racists to promote their racism... how do you know they're racists in the first place?No it isn't, it's seen as racism when it is being used by racists to promote their racism.But apparently having a flag on your door or your car or your backpack is seen as racism.
But, I don't believe it was ever technically illegal to fly the "hammer and sickle" in the USA.That's an overly narrow definition. The US and the USSR were enemies during the cold war, but not actually at war with each other.
Clearly Hamas is worse than the Nazi's as well."that arouse reasonable suspicion of support for the groups."
The key point is about support, as was mentioned earlier I could have a Hamas flag with a skull and crossbones over it and the waving of that wouldn't be illegal, if we were filming a show or movie it wouldn't be illegal. It's the support that makes it illegal not the waving of the flag itself. The flag is not illegal in the UK.
At least we know that the Nazis were never the enemy of the UK, minor disagreements in the late 30's and early 40's not withstanding.Isn't it? Shouldn't it be? If the UK is not an enemy of Hamas, that's a damning indictment of the UK.
Got it flying a nazi flag is not a racist act. It is the flag of a nation and therefor can not be racist. QEDCertainly not as it relates to displaying their nation's flag. If you find it unbelievable that displaying their own nation's flag doesn't provide any plausible means to determine whether a person is or is not a racist, you might want to give the topic a wee bit more thought.
Watching Churchill's speeches it is interesting how he often emphasises the enemies are Nazis not Germans. In contrast to WW1 the British were surprisingly not anti-German in WW2. I have met a surprisingly large number of German POWs who never left Britain.At least we know that the Nazis were never the enemy of the UK, minor disagreements in the late 30's and early 40's not withstanding.
You're waffling back and forth again. We were talking about being an enemy of the State. For some reason, you think that has to be another sovereign state that we have declared war against. That is not true. Here:That's for FOREIGN terror groups. Not domestic. There is no such thing in the USA as a official domestic terrorist organization.
Of course not, as the USA and USSR were never at war and therefore never legal enemies.But, I don't believe it was ever technically illegal to fly the "hammer and sickle" in the USA.
Waving the Nazi Germany flag can be seen as a racist act, since racism was official govt policy. Same with waving the flag of South Africa until the end of Apartheid.Got it flying a nazi flag is not a racist act. It is the flag of a nation and therefor can not be racist. QED