Merged Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University event. / Charlie Kirk Shot And Killed

Clear that Kirk is going to do double duty for the far right: he will become both their Reichstag Fire and their Horst Wessel.
I actually heard a right-wing American politician saying that Kirk would be their Reichstag fire, which showed either a singular lack of knowledge or an exceptionally unlikely candour.
 
IIRC, Bondi was seen as one of the least bad of his picks when she was named. I'd say that was wrong but they are all so bad. Still, saying you're going to start prosecuting folks for speech, seems impeachable to me, remarkably dumb. The FCC threatening licenses is straight of the Chavez playbook. Trump and MAGA always gets worse.
 
that they're building altars to a guy who made his bones bombarding children with logical fallacies




i’m not really sure what specifically they are so angry at about kimmel’s comments.

"... MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them."
It was idiotic when he said it. There's still a lot of denial going on around here, but everything we've heard indicates the assassin was not MAGA. Kimmel was spreading disinformation, and by accounts was going to double down, which moves it into deliberate falsehood.
 
Last edited:
"... MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them."
It was idiotic when he said it. There's still a lot of denial going on around here, but everything we've heard indicates the assassin was not MAGA. Kimmel was spreading disinformation, and by accounts was going to double down, which moves it into deliberate falsehood.

but they said it was his comments about kirk. which, as you can see, he made no comments about kirk

you’re saying it’s his comments about maga? and that he may have made further comments that may or may not have been true, and needed to be stopped?

that’s if i’m to buy you suddenly have a problem with disinformation, which i don’t.
 
"... MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them."
It was idiotic when he said it. There's still a lot of denial going on around here, but everything we've heard indicates the assassin was not MAGA. Kimmel was spreading disinformation, and by accounts was going to double down, which moves it into deliberate falsehood.
I thought the show was meant to be light entertainment not a news programme.
 
Kimmel just needs to turn his show into a radio show, smoke lots of cigarettes, lower his voice and scream a lot and sell some snake oil while doing so.

Then he's good to go to spread the most outrageous lies and declare it entertainment!
 
"... MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them."
It was idiotic when he said it. There's still a lot of denial going on around here, but everything we've heard indicates the assassin was not MAGA. Kimmel was spreading disinformation, and by accounts was going to double down, which moves it into deliberate falsehood.

Taking you out of the equation, I don't know what you've bitched about, but for the right to all of a sudden care about misinformation\disinformation is absolutely hilarious. Next level hilarity. The hypocrisy in this alone is enough to make every meter that has ever existed explode.

As Darat said, Kimmel is late night entertainment. Fox, Newsmax, etc. are trying to pass themselves as actual news and spouting disinformation as their default format, yet not so much as a peep from you, or any other rightie.
 
You think that is just a coincidence?
No coincidences anymore in this universe. At some point in the past we branched into the wrong universe. Now we are in a universe were an actual god exists. And he send down Trump to mock the rest of humanity for not believing in him. Trump is the embodiment of this narcissistic and revengeful god.
 
"... MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them."
It was idiotic when he said it. There's still a lot of denial going on around here, but everything we've heard indicates the assassin was not MAGA. Kimmel was spreading disinformation, and by accounts was going to double down, which moves it into deliberate falsehood.
The way I interpreted that statement is pretty much how most of us horrible libtards view Robinson; he was brought up MAGA, brought up to believe guns solve your personal problems, and he may have distanced himself from his family's MAGA influence etc but he certainly did not leave behind the culture of violently hating those who you disagree with. So no, while it remains to be seen if he had any ties to online alt-right groups, to point out the desperation of MAGA trying to portray someone who fit their mold as something else is spot-on, not at all 'idiotic'
It does not matter whether he was hardcore 'MAGA'--the point being made is that MAGA wants to disavow their support of political violence.
 
Last edited:
"... MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them."
It was idiotic when he said it. There's still a lot of denial going on around here, but everything we've heard indicates the assassin was not MAGA. Kimmel was spreading disinformation, and by accounts was going to double down, which moves it into deliberate falsehood.

I see, so when the fat clown double's down on his falsehoods, that's ok? Got it.

Complaining about posters here being in denial is so ironic it's hilarious.

Thank you for your attention to this matter and have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
There was another individual like Charlie who was around for 30 years or so and did threaten an institution. My brother told me about this Rush fellow on the radio and that I should give him a listen. I later found out his last name was Limbaugh, but never listened.

My brother told me that liberals tried to compete with Limbaugh and failed. Rush laughed at the attempt and said that they did not understand that he was first and foremost an entertainer and secondarily a political and social commentator.

Someone could have done exactly what Charlie Kirk was doing. A secular statist could have set up a tent at a university and expounded upon the wonders of centralized government. But like me 55 years ago, those college kids were already subjected to those teachings in their economics and political science courses. So, like the attempt to compete on the radio, this most likely would have failed.
 
There was another individual like Charlie who was around for 30 years or so and did threaten an institution. My brother told me about this Rush fellow on the radio and that I should give him a listen. I later found out his last name was Limbaugh, but never listened.

My brother told me that liberals tried to compete with Limbaugh and failed. Rush laughed at the attempt and said that they did not understand that he was first and foremost an entertainer and secondarily a political and social commentator.

Someone could have done exactly what Charlie Kirk was doing. A secular statist could have set up a tent at a university and expounded upon the wonders of centralized government. But like me 55 years ago, those college kids were already subjected to those teachings in their economics and political science courses. So, like the attempt to compete on the radio, this most likely would have failed.

 

Back
Top Bottom