You have to vilify Lumumba, otherwise you'd have to face the grim reality AK coldly acted the way she did of her own calculated free will. But let's pretend she was a poor waif tricked by the police, to keep up the romantic fantasy of Amelie Wronged.
You have to minimize Guede's and Lumumba's lies, the police's inept, tunnel-visioned, and suspect-centered investigation otherwise you have to face the grim reality that Knox and Sollecito had nothing to do with the murder.
In contrast with the relatively large number of cases involving alleged denial of access to a lawyer, there are only 11 cases total involving either the absence of an interpreter, inadequate interpretation, or the failure to provide free interpretation, with 9 cases judged by a Chamber and 2 by a Committee. In part, a likely reason for the low number of cases is that most persons accused of a crime in any one CoE state are residents of that state and fluent in the language used in that state. Another reason may be that most of the CoE states, being aware of the range of languages in use among the European states, are careful to provide adequate interpretation to suspects and accused persons. While there are 11 violations of Article 6.3e among the 11 cases, there are also a few non-violations. For example, in one case, the ECHR found no violation regarding the interpretation, but found a violation in the failure of the state to provide the interpretation free of charge.
Please can you address why Knox and Sollecito told so many lies if they are merely the helpless victims of circumstances. If they had nothing to do with the murder, what motive or fun did they get out of lying to the police and the public, and please don't pretend 'they were tortured all night long with tag teams of twelve from Rome'. Please stop trying divert attention away from their behaviour by pointing to someone else's behaviour.
Remind me of the answer to the following:
No doubt the cops were under tremendous pressure from the global media to find the killer, resulting in tunnel vision and poor judgment. I think those pressures railroaded them into a self-inflicted frenzy that K&S got caught up in. The result was an obsessive and aggressive interview with K&S, which only resulted in more and more contradictions from them. In other words, the contradictory depositions and statements were orchestrated out of obsessive, heavy-handed tactics, when a softly-softly approach would have yielded better results. The Boninsegna motivation nailed it when they said that the investigation:
So, what about the following statement.
According to the phone records, Amanda phoned Meredith 3 times on both phones before returning to VDP7 with Raffaele, which is when she discovered the mess in Filomena's room. It was then that she started banging on Meredith's door and shouting Meredith's name. Phoning and potentially being routed to voicemail doesn't mean that Meredith isn't in her room. Making sure that Meredith is at VDP7 and responsive would take priority.
Next question:
The answer is 'no'.
The phone calls you mention connected with Via dell'Aquila n.5 - Torre dell'Aquedotto, Sett.9 or Via dell'Aquila n.5 - Torre dell'Aquedotto, Sett.3, both of which serve the vicinity of Raffaele's flat.