Because it has already been discussed to death. In addition, the investigators have now confirmed there WAS a massive hole in the hull as has been claimed for years. All we need do now is await the final report to see whether it all adds up at last.
Think about it. There were at least >1,000 passengers and crew. No-one took their luggage with them when the ship sank. So out of literally hundreds of bags and suitcases strewn about, they make a beeline for that one, to the extent of spelling out the name on it. And the guy turns out to be an ethnic Russian arms dealer who smuggled arms to Israel. And he had either swapped or shared/socialised in, the same cabin as Piht, who was wanted by Interpol 7 Oct 1994.
At least you concede that you are posting nonsense.
But you were asked about the alleged dead body in red with the bullet wound, not about a massive hole in the side of the Estonia. It would only take you a few seconds to post a citation for the evidence, why are you willing to accurately cite irrelevant books about World War II but completely unwilling to cite the evidence for the strange body in red with the bullet wound on the bridge?
Evidence that divers "made a beeline" for a particular case? I'm betting you won't even pretend to provide evidence for this claim, just lazily telling others to go search for and find the evidence themselves.
The Estonia sank stern down first, bow in the air. The depth was 80m, the length of the vessel was 155m. Do the maths, So now the 22m gaping hole in the hull has been confirmed, although not mentioned at all in the original JAIC Report (how could they miss it?). So the trigger 'initial findings' is that this was caused by rocks where it landed and rolled against. This is classic Change Management, preparing the public for a conclusion it was the rocks that caused the hole. Let's see if it all adds up.
Er, the guy on the video tape can be heard spelling out Voronin's name, albeit incorrectly.
I think Christopher Bollyn is a pseudonym but from what he says of himself and his theories about the 9/11 disaster, I get the sense he is anti-Israel and pro-Islamist Middle Eastern states. I might be completely wrong but that is the vibe I picked up from reading his stuff.
The "guy on the tape" spelled out something that was not "Voronin" therefore he was spelling "Voronin". Uh huh
Which guy and which video tape?
I have already referenced the tape elsewhere in the thread.
That's clearly conjecture Vixen. I thought you only dealt in facts?
Is that video a factual representation of how it sank? What's your basis for citing it as an accurate representation of what actually happened? And taken for granted that it is accurate, how exactly does it prove whatever you think it proves?
It may be legal; that doesn't make it ethical.
You only said that after I called you on your comments, and you claimed that "any fool knows that," or something to that effect. You initially gave no indication that you didn't believe it was true.
Well Vixen claims to know it so.......