Clocking a third person's gender, yes.
Sort of? Sex and gender have 99+% overlap, so in practice it does tend to read binary, but I feel like seeing a transwoman has me clocking them as "someone I perceive as female", even when confident that the person is a bio male.
The vast majority of males are not criminals.
It's changed now due to reasons I've outlined
The number one indicator of criminal intent is sex
From what I've seen in trans-rights rallies and anti-TERF protests on YouTube most transwomen do not appear to be excessively effeminate, and a surprising number of them are not gay.
Absolutely. But um... there was no rape going on here. Just a cis woman peeing alone in the women's room. The worker followed her in there and harrassed her alone in the room.
Right... right, it was two cis women. That's what I'm trying to tell you- there was no third party, especially one that is to blame for the worker's bigotry.
Pretty sure it did. Bigots have been bigotting longer than the TRA movement has been rolling.
Yes, that's what you keep saying, ridiculous as it is.
Congratulations, Mr Holmes. You've narrowed the field down to 4 billion suspects. Oh wait...
They challenged this unfortunate woman because the movement you support demands all men be allowed access to the safe spaces that women go to to try and avoid rape. This is happening more now because of the reasons I've outlined.
That's one woman - do you really want me to find a hundred men in the same time frame? A thousand?
You are lying. You have no idea if thoughts of rape was any kind of factor. You're literally just making ◊◊◊◊ up now.
I don't. Another imaginary silliness from out in Manger Douse World.
Yeah, no. Hard pass on having an argument with voices in your head.
The reason women have safe spaces is to avoid rape - they now have to gatekeep these spaces because the moment you're supporting undeniably demands any man have access to those spaces and undeniably makes those those spaces more dangerous
It was meant to be “now”.
Now this is an interesting case, because it illustrates something you didn't intend to illustrate. Who did this woman try to kill? A stranger? No. Her husband.
"I can let in my friends if i want but if you ain't my friend youre a second class citizen" seems harsh?
I abso-freaking-lutely gaurantee that if you sounded the verbal alarm for any misbehaving person, male or otherwise, virtually every guy within earshot would come ready to rumble, with yours truly leading the pack. No one is going to ignore a cry for help wondering if it will be politically correct to do so.
I really don't think that anyone is demanding that any behavior be tolerated for any reason. And this "by my permission" angle makes no sense in a public space. What happens when a transwoman gets the pass from everyone, but this Buffalo Wings worker strolls in? Can she demand boob inspections of everyone, including you, at her sole discretion?
And yet, and yet.
Am I a second class citizen because I'm an ordinary male? I'm excluded from the women's bathroom.
Sure they are. They are demanding that males intruding on female spaces (behavior) be tolerated because they claim a gender identity (for any reason).
And no one is inviting you in. See how that works? It has nothing to do with you and I and 99+% of bio males. Pixel is the one who wants to let in who she pleases. Do you think you can invite some girls into the men's room at your sole discretion? Does Ms Pixel swing the door wide for you to come in if she feels like it? More importantly, would you accept her invitation?
Thinking about this, when you said you would prefer to be intimately examined by a woman when the situation demanded, is there any reason a female could refuse to preform this examination on you personally and you wouldn't think of her as a bigot?