Thermal
August Member
I'm with you on that: it's removed from reality. First off, EC and I were talking about the American POV. Second, your first two articles are the same. Did that make you feel.like you were giving a lot of information to repeat the same article twice? Third, the first two articles were about unisex changing rooms for swimming, which we are all in agreement on is lunacy (sounds like you guys really have it together over there), so utterly irrelevant. The last is a story about one boy that commited multiple sexual assaults, some in and some out of gender neutral toilets, which ITT we all are also in agreement is crazy for schoolchildren.That is so far removed from reality as to be in another space-time dimension.
![]()
Unisex changing rooms put women at danger of sexual assault, data reveals
The vast majority of reported sexual assaults at public swimming pools in the UK take place in unisex changing rooms, new statistics reveal.www.independent.co.uk
![]()
Unisex changing rooms put women in danger | Fair Play For Women
There is unequivocal evidence that unisex changing rooms are more dangerous for women and girls than single-sex facilities. Get the factsfairplayforwomen.com
![]()
Girls assaulted in gender-neutral toilets — as predicted
Police are investigating allegations that female pupils were sexually assaulted in “gender-neutral” lavatories at a school in Essex. A teenage boy has been arrested on suspicion of sexual assault, with three of the four alleged attacks apparently taking place in toilets used by both sexes. Is...unherd.com
And none of these is actually the article I went looking for.
So yet again, the question is: did you not understand what you were posting, or were you being dishonest again?