Neil Gaiman "cancelled"?

Honestly, I have no idea whether he committed a criminal offence or not, but his behaviour was sleazebag+++ and he deserves all the cancellaiton he's getting.
 
This is what I feel about it too. Even if everything Gaiman says is true, he's still someone I no longer have any respect for.

No. You are the one forgetting this important issue. Gaiman himself corroborates almost everything except the lack of consent for certain acts. Acts which he agrees that he participated in. Palmer also corroborates most of the claims.
I agree that he is a scumbag. Any 60+ person getting it on with a 25 year old is a disgusting individual in my book, but it is NOT a criminal offence to do so, and does not automatically indicate a lack of consent in either direction.

We also only have her word that there was a lack of consent, and the only DOCUMENTARY evidence we see i.e. the messages, directly indicate that she was a willing participant in everything that happened.

Four, including Gaiman himself....
Names of the other two.... they are not named in the complaint. Who are they?
 
I agree that he is a scumbag. Any 60+ person getting it on with a 25 year old is a disgusting individual in my book, but it is NOT a criminal offence to do so, and does not automatically indicate a lack of consent in either direction.

We also only have her word that there was a lack of consent, and the only DOCUMENTARY evidence we see i.e. the messages, directly indicate that she was a willing participant in everything that happened.


Names of the other two.... they are not named in the complaint. Who are they?
Who cares who they are? You already have Gaiman and Palmer.

In any case they'll be named if and when either side introduces their testimony at trial*.


*Technically they'd be named during discovery, but that's not usually made public.
 
I agree that he is a scumbag. Any 60+ person getting it on with a 25 year old is a disgusting individual in my book, but it is NOT a criminal offence to do so , and does not automatically indicate a lack of consent in either direction.

We also only have her word that there was a lack of consent, and the only DOCUMENTARY evidence we see i.e. the messages, directly indicate that she was a willing participant in everything that happened.


Names of the other two.... they are not named in the complaint. Who are they?
Although this is the second time smartcooky has said she was 25, news reports I have seen say she was 22. Maybe not a major distinction but the age of 25 was previously brought up by smartcooky to say she was hardly that young, dismissing the idea that her youth could be exploited by not paying her for her nanny services…

“FFS, she was 25 when all this was alleged to have happened!!”
 
Although this is the second time smartcooky has said she was 25, news reports I have seen say she was 22. Maybe not a major distinction but the age of 25 was previously brought up by smartcooky to say she was hardly that young, dismissing the idea that her youth could be exploited by not paying her for her nanny services…

“FFS, she was 25 when all this was alleged to have happened!!”
The complaint says she was 22, and though smartcooky claims to have read it, he keeps saying she was 25.
 
The complaint says she was 22, and though smartcooky claims to have read it, he keeps saying she was 25.
Oh dear Orphia Nay. Its seem like it is YOU who hasn't read the complaint.

A. Palmer Targets Scarlett
18. Scarlett met Palmer in Auckland, New Zealand, in 2020
19. Scarlett met Palmer in and around the time of the COVID pandemic outbreak.
20. At the time, Scarlett was 22 years old
21. The two became acquaintances.
22. Scarlett would occasionally visit Palmer at Palmer’s house on Waiheke Island

The Covid19 pandemic outbreak was 2019, but in NZ it really started to hit hard in February of 2020

So Pavlovich was 22 at the time she met Palmer in 2020

B. A Promise of Employment
36. On February 1, 2022, Palmer asked Scarlett if Scarlett could babysit for the weekend.

This makes Pavlovich 24 years old before she ever met Gaiman.
The sex between Pavlovich and Gaiman, which IMO appears to be fully consensual (at least according to the messages) goes on until at least
December 30, 2022 (the date of the last message I have seen). It could have gone beyond that time.

Pavlovich would either have turned 25 by then, or be very close to it, so I stand by my statement.

Care to walk back your bull-◊◊◊◊ claim now?
 
Last edited:
Who cares who they are? You already have Gaiman and Palmer.

In any case they'll be named if and when either side introduces their testimony at trial*.


*Technically they'd be named during discovery, but that's not usually made public.
Don't be silly. If you don't know their names, they don't exist.
 
Pavlovich would either have turned 25 by then, or be very close to it, so I stand by my statement.

Care to walk back your bull-◊◊◊◊ claim now?
"Maybe not a major distinction" as was said earlier if you'd like to engage in the discussion.
 
IMG_6499.jpegOh dear Orphia Nay. Its seem like it is YOU who hasn't read the complaint.

A. Palmer Targets Scarlett
18. Scarlett met Palmer in Auckland, New Zealand, in 2020
19. Scarlett met Palmer in and around the time of the COVID pandemic outbreak.
20. At the time, Scarlett was 22 years old
21. The two became acquaintances.
22. Scarlett would occasionally visit Palmer at Palmer’s house on Waiheke Island

The Covid19 pandemic outbreak was 2019, but in NZ it really started to hit hard in February of 2020

So Pavlovich was 22 at the time she met Palmer in 2020

B. A Promise of Employment
36. On February 1, 2022, Palmer asked Scarlett if Scarlett could babysit for the weekend.

This makes Pavlovich 24 years old before she ever met Gaiman.
The sex between Pavlovich and Gaiman, which IMO appears to be fully consensual (at least according to the messages) goes on until at least
December 30, 2022 (the date of the last message I have seen). It could have gone beyond that time.

Pavlovich would either have turned 25 by then, or be very close to it, so I stand by my statement.

Care to walk back your bull-◊◊◊◊ claim now?
If that is the case, then she is still younger than smartcooky claimed.
 
Oh dear Orphia Nay. Its seem like it is YOU who hasn't read the complaint.

A. Palmer Targets Scarlett
18. Scarlett met Palmer in Auckland, New Zealand, in 2020
19. Scarlett met Palmer in and around the time of the COVID pandemic outbreak.
20. At the time, Scarlett was 22 years old
21. The two became acquaintances.
22. Scarlett would occasionally visit Palmer at Palmer’s house on Waiheke Island

The Covid19 pandemic outbreak was 2019, but in NZ it really started to hit hard in February of 2020

So Pavlovich was 22 at the time she met Palmer in 2020

B. A Promise of Employment
36. On February 1, 2022, Palmer asked Scarlett if Scarlett could babysit for the weekend.

This makes Pavlovich 24 years old before she ever met Gaiman.
The sex between Pavlovich and Gaiman, which IMO appears to be fully consensual (at least according to the messages) goes on until at least
December 30, 2022 (the date of the last message I have seen). It could have gone beyond that time.

Pavlovich would either have turned 25 by then, or be very close to it, so I stand by my statement.

Care to walk back your bull-◊◊◊◊ claim now?

Some of the reports say, incorrectly, that Pavlovich first met the couple in 2020, when it was just Palmer, so that could be the source of some of the confusion.

That said, 'around the time of the COVID pandemic' is a bit vague. I don't know about NZ, but we didn't get lockdowns here until late March 2020. If she was just 22 in March or April 2020, she would be only 23 in February 2022.

That's also consistent with this Daily Fail article, from February 2025 which quotes her age then (the time of publication) as being 26, so 23 in February 2022.


 
Last edited:
Both of whom corroborate pretty much her entire story.
Wrong The entire basis of her story, and for the lawsuit, is that it was all non-consensual, and that Palmer procured her for Gaiman.

They both deny those allegations.



The rest of her story is merely the surrounding cicumstances.
 
Wrong The entire basis of her story, and for the lawsuit, is that it was all non-consensual, and that Palmer procured her for Gaiman.

They both deny those allegations.



The rest of her story is merely the surrounding cicumstances.
Right, so when you said her story hadn't been corroborated, what you meant was all of the decisions and actions Gaiman is accused of taking have been corroborated by Gaiman himself, and the only point of dispute is his victim's state of mind.

Also, non consent to sexual acts is not the basis of the trafficking suit.
 
Right, so when you said her story hadn't been corroborated, what you meant was all of the decisions and actions Gaiman is accused of taking have been corroborated by Gaiman himself , and the only point of dispute is his victim's state of mind.

Well, this is your claim, not mine... but I don't expect your back that up at all any time soon.
Also, non consent to sexual acts is not the basis of the trafficking suit.
Its is if the claim is she was trafficked for sex.
 

Back
Top Bottom