• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Face, meet leopard. Leopard, meet face.

Less than 1%.
So round down to a number you think is actually reasonable. Less than 1% without any additional information should be treated as being close to 1%. If it were close to 0.5%, they'd have said "about half a percent" or something similar. So it's reasonable to assume that it's close enough to 1% to use 1% as a proxy.
 
What is an acceptable number of dead veterans for you? Do you realize we'll end up spending more money to fix the damage by these mindless, ignorant, and pointless cuts?
OMG!!!!! We absolutely have to allow fraud and waste and inefficiencies to keep eating up taxpayer money, there's no possible way we could avoid that. People are going to DIE!!!

Are you unable to conceive of a way to treat veterans efficiently, without wasting taxpayer money? Seriously, you fail at basic business sense.
 
OMG!!!!! We absolutely have to allow fraud and waste and inefficiencies to keep eating up taxpayer money, there's no possible way we could avoid that. People are going to DIE!!!

Are you unable to conceive of a way to treat veterans efficiently, without wasting taxpayer money? Seriously, you fail at basic business sense.
Are we still pretending to be stupid enough to believe this is about fraud and waste?
 
Damn, do none of you people know any federal employees? Most of the cards are for travel. A lot of jobs require a lot of travel.
That's what I'm trying to work out. Who needs cards for what, and how did Muskrat and the Minions figure out what was needed and by who in like... thirty minutes? I kind of assume government is a little stingy with giving out free credit cards, and they get gone over line by line?

I ask because I'm in construction, and occasionally have to move large things on public streets, like houses and stuff. So we have to contract escort vehicles with amber lights and Wide Load signage and all that. One year we got questioned rather pointedly because of a business expense that was billed by... Goldie's Escorts. It was briefly uncomfortable.
 
The very first paragraph, emphasis mine:



Dropping the limit on almost all cards with some few exceptions can be done very quickly and efficiently, and also allows for that limit to be raised upon evaluation. It's arguably a better approach than revoking all the cards and then having to issue new ones in the future.
IOW, the intent was, indeed, to curtail purchasing, as was said, and as you tried to deny. Again, the instruction was to shut down purchasing on *all cards*, not just an identified subset of them. The plan was then to (possibly, no promises) reinstate purchasing power for an arbitrarily-set maximum of cards, if the agency could justify their use to some unspecified degree of satisfaction.

This is not the behavior of management trying to improve systems; it is the behavior of management trying to drastically curtail expenditure.
 
Damn, do none of you people know any federal employees? Most of the cards are for travel. A lot of jobs require a lot of travel.
Indeed, issuing a card is a favored method in, for example, the armed forces for enabling servicepeople on TDY to pay for their expenses. Also, for agencies that operate a lot of smaller local facilities (such as, say VA clinics) or branch offices so that they can purchase things they need without having to go through some centralized supply system in Washington. I mean, that's what Republicans want, right? To have a government that can deliver service with a minimum of bloated Beltway bureaucracy?
 
HA! I am the Man of a Million Faces! When the leopard eats one, I don another!

They eat my face!
But I get another one!
You're never gonna keep me down!
A Hungarian (John Cleese) enters a tobacconist's shop<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Hungarian_Phrasebook#cite_note-AllTheWords-p16-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a> carrying a Hungarian-to-English phrasebook and begins a dialogue with the tobacconist (Terry Jones); he wants to buy cigarettes, but his phrasebook's translations are wholly inaccurate and have no resemblance to what he wants to say.
Sorry, I'm pretty drunk now,
 
Are you unable to conceive of a way to treat veterans efficiently, without wasting taxpayer money? Seriously, you fail at basic business sense.
I am certainly able to conceive of a way *not* to do it.

Don't make sudden, disruptive changes to VA's legitimate and important work before conducting a proper audit of the relevant accounts and systems to identify actual problems.

Don't treat as a default position the hostile notion that there is rampant fraud, waste, and abuse in need of drastic remedy.

Don't entrust important decisions to 20-year-old techbros who know nothing about the organization, and who get their accounting advice from PriceWaterhouseGPT.

ETA: Oh, and don't fire the IG on day one.
 
Last edited:
A Hungarian (John Cleese) enters a tobacconist's shop<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Hungarian_Phrasebook#cite_note-AllTheWords-p16-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a> carrying a Hungarian-to-English phrasebook and begins a dialogue with the tobacconist (Terry Jones); he wants to buy cigarettes, but his phrasebook's translations are wholly inaccurate and have no resemblance to what he wants to say.
Sorry, I'm pretty drunk now,
*looks at phrase book* I cannot buy this face. It is eaten.
 

Back
Top Bottom