Segnosaur
Penultimate Amazing
Re: Schindler as an example that "not all nazis are bad...
A "rule" was suggested (i.e. all nazis are bad), an exception was proposed (look at schindler).
But when you look at Schindler, you see evidence that he likely was not a "nazi". (Yes, he was a member of the nazi party, but his actions suggest it was more of a ruse, a cover, and that he didn't actually subscribe to the ideals of the nazi party.)
The fact that in order to find someone who fit the idea that "not all nazis were bad" you had to find someone who actually contradicted the nazi ideology, is evidence for the validity of the rule.
First of all, Schindler actually DID something to save lives (resist fascism). On the other hand, we do not see any such actions from the republicans. (Yeah, they may talk in private about how "Trump is crazy/he's a problem", or they may complain about him after they leave politics, but when confronted with the opportunity to actually do something, they cave. (Witness that the ONLY senator to reject Kennedy's confirmation was Moscow Mitch.)
Secondly, the U.S. has a (sort of almost) democracy. Unlike Schindler (where he was working in an authoritarian system), a republican congress critter actually COULD have a significant role in undermining Trump, with no risk of being arrested by the government. (one or 2 congressmen voting against the MAGAchud could be enough to block unqualified Trump nominees, or prevent questionable legislation from being passed.)
Actually I think its a perfect example of what the expression means.to be incredibly pedantic - not what that expression means.As the saying goes, he is the exception that proves the rule.
A "rule" was suggested (i.e. all nazis are bad), an exception was proposed (look at schindler).
But when you look at Schindler, you see evidence that he likely was not a "nazi". (Yes, he was a member of the nazi party, but his actions suggest it was more of a ruse, a cover, and that he didn't actually subscribe to the ideals of the nazi party.)
The fact that in order to find someone who fit the idea that "not all nazis were bad" you had to find someone who actually contradicted the nazi ideology, is evidence for the validity of the rule.
All that is irrelevant in describing the current state of American politics (and the idea that "all republicans are scum).What the example of Schindler proves is that resistance against Fascism is always possible - if you are incredibly privileged, in a position of authority and don't embarrass the powers that be publicly. In other words: if you are not a threat to the system, you can get away with a lot.
Which just highlights that a Schindler-like resistance would never be enough to stop Fascism.
First of all, Schindler actually DID something to save lives (resist fascism). On the other hand, we do not see any such actions from the republicans. (Yeah, they may talk in private about how "Trump is crazy/he's a problem", or they may complain about him after they leave politics, but when confronted with the opportunity to actually do something, they cave. (Witness that the ONLY senator to reject Kennedy's confirmation was Moscow Mitch.)
Secondly, the U.S. has a (sort of almost) democracy. Unlike Schindler (where he was working in an authoritarian system), a republican congress critter actually COULD have a significant role in undermining Trump, with no risk of being arrested by the government. (one or 2 congressmen voting against the MAGAchud could be enough to block unqualified Trump nominees, or prevent questionable legislation from being passed.)
