MarkCorrigan
Героям слава!
Then why would you not use science if you outright state there isn't a better method? Why would you dismiss the findings of the science?There is no better!
Then why would you not use science if you outright state there isn't a better method? Why would you dismiss the findings of the science?There is no better!
THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP ARGUING ABOUT IT???There is no better!
The other methods only help the scientific method!Then why would you not use science if you outright state there isn't a better method? Why would you dismiss the findings of the science?
I genuinely do not understand what this means. It is nonsense in the context of responding to my post.The other methods only help the scientific method!
He just needs to repeat it for another 39 pages. Sheesh, impatient much?I genuinely do not understand what this means. It is nonsense in the context of responding to my post.
One fifth of Americans can't find Brazil on a map. Should be a giant red flag.45% of Americans believe in spirits
Then why do you continue to insult your critics for preferring the best method to determine reliable fact? Why do you keep insulting them and calling them names?There is no better!
The only other method you've mentioned specifically is the historical-critical method, which is not relevant. The other methods you've alluded to seem to contradict the scientific method by emphasizing such things as cultural norms.The other methods only help the scientific method!
It's right there next to the American Ocean.One fifth of Americans can't find Brazil on a map.
Truth = Philosophyscientific method cannot claim a monopoly on truth
JayUtah, is a Genuine Skeptic, at no time did he have Pseudoskeptical manifestations! The people on this forum should take him as an example!Then why do you continue to insult your critics for preferring the best method to determine reliable fact? Why do you keep insulting them and calling them names?
Yet more nonsense from you. Jay is agreeing with the people you're insulting.JayUtah, is a Genuine Skeptic, at no time did he have Pseudoskeptical manifestations! The people on this forum should take him as an example!
If I accept that spirits exist, I will have to admit that there are things I don't understand, and that makes me uncomfortable.You're just pulling this straight out of your backside.
Thank you, but personal flattery is irrelevant. You have been addressed by several people in this thread who have exemplified the process of skeptical inquiry. You have treated them very rudely. An apology to them would be in order, if you intend to proceed.JayUtah, is a Genuine Skeptic, at no time did he have Pseudoskeptical manifestations! The people on this forum should take him as an example
In your case these reactions are based on your unwillingness, and inability to present evidence to support your claims. You've come here looking for a fight, and complain when you get one. The disdain comes from your unwillingness to defend your claims in any way. You're just a troll.beliefs in spirits challenge the strictly materialistic view of pseudoskeptics by causing cognitive dissonance to reduce discomfort they react with aggression or disdain
I do not understand why you would accept spirits exist. There is no evidence for them in any way. The proper thing to do is to take this total absence of evidence as meaning that spirits do not exist until presented with evidence that they do.If I accept that spirits exist, I will have to admit that there are things I don't understand, and that makes me uncomfortable.
There will always be things you don't understand, and things that we as a species do not understand. The proven path to success is not to simply assume certain things exist for which there is no evidence, and attribute to them whatever observation you can't explain. The proven path to success in understanding new things is to approach the questions methodically according to evidence and according to methods that guard against known wrong ways of reasoning, such as confirmation bias.If I accept that spirits exist, I will have to admit that there are things I don't understand, and that makes me uncomfortable.
In what way do Jay's posts differ from mine in their content?
Sorry to everyone on the forum! I have no prejudice against skeptics! I am only against pseudoskepticism but without prejudice against pseudoskeptics!Thank you, but personal flattery is irrelevant. You have been addressed by several people in this thread who have exemplified the process of skeptical inquiry. You have treated them very rudely. An apology to them would be in order, if you intend to proceed.
Was it your son who wrote that?Sorry to everyone on the forum! I have no prejudice against skeptics! I am only against pseudoskepticism but without prejudice against pseudoskeptics!
In Christianity, many believe that souls continue to exist after death.Why would you presume spirits exist?