Pixel42
Schrödinger's cat
There's a lot of ignorant superstition in the US, yes.
Merged The razor of Hitchens and the Spirits!
- Thread starter Calderaro
- Start date
The United States is a country with great religious diversity, and many spiritual and religious traditions, such as Spiritism, Spiritualism, and some indigenous or African-American practices, include a belief in spirits
MarkCorrigan
Героям слава!
So. What?
Why do you keep repeating this as if it means something? Lots of people are nutters who believe in spirits. This has no bearing on whether spirits are real.
So ask the question! What do you want to ask?
and in England?
MarkCorrigan
Героям слава!
You have been asked several questions by several posters including myself. Go back and read them yourself, do not expect people to spoonfeed you everything.
Carrot Flower King
Janitor of Lunacy
Have you bothered reading a single thing anyone (anyone at all) has posted here in response to you?
You are coming across ass very arrogant, rude and dismissive in your total lack of any sensible respones.
the scientific method is not infallible! you should not believe only in the scientific method!
Carrot Flower King
Janitor of Lunacy
Yeah, we have it too. To the point that we even allow bishops to be part of our government.
let's start over!
MarkCorrigan
Героям слава!
1. Does not respond even slightly to my post.
2. Infallible? No. Only tool we have for determining truth claims? Yes.
MarkCorrigan
Героям слава!
No. You do not get to declare previous posts not to have happened because you're too lazy to go and look at them.
I have no personal empirical evidence of the existence of spirits! I'm just presenting something that might be empirical evidence?
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
No amount of belief constitutes objective, testable evidence.
True, but irrelevant. It is not objective, testable evidence that spirits exist and do all the things attributed to them.
People have already asked you many questions, which you ignore. They want you to stop ignoring them.
Nothing is infallible. However the scientific method is proven to be the most reliable way of testing claims of fact.
Stop playing games. You can't "start over" as if everything that's been said to you suddenly stops existing. If you admit you don't have the kind of evidence that would convince skeptics, it is foolish (and more than a little annoying) that you would still try. Begging people to lower their standards to accept your claims is not the way to convince them.
MarkCorrigan
Героям слава!
You've been told, repeatedly, why it is not empirical evidence. All you do in response is to tell us you're just presenting the evidence.
Deal with the refutations of your posts. There are lots.
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 23,211
All the questions are in this thread. Analyse this thread and you will find them.
Or don't. It's your choice.
is that I was getting used to this forum
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
Agreed, you seem to have none of the kind of evidence that will convince skeptics that your claim is true. You've spent nearly forty pages proving that you don't. The question is why you continue to argue that skeptics should nevertheless accept your claims, and further why you are doing so in an extremely rude way.
Make up your mind. You tell us in one sentence that you do not have suitable evidence, then in the next sentence suggest that you might.
No. It does not take nearly forty pages of discussion for you to "analyze" and "get used" to this forum. You've been mindlessly repeating the same glib nonsense over and over again. No part of that constitutes a credible exercise in familiarization.
Thermal
August Member
There you are. A slightly lesser percentage think Donald Trump should be its President. ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ fruit loops. QED.