• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Does anyone here believe that Princess Diana's car crash was suspicious?

BartholomewWest said:
Sigh. I will be generous here and admit that Diana's car crash was perhaps something we could put in the "maybe" category.
Click to expand...

Dude, just listen to yourself. Your claims have been comprehensively debunked, and what is your reaction? You will "generously" concede none of that, and instead try to shut down the conversation. Really? Is that the best you can do?
This is, again, coming from confirmation bias. Look it up. Educate yourself. Please.
 
Vixen said:
That was an example of brushing it off. I was not picking on Darat specifically. I was highlighting the logic, or lack thereof, being used.
Click to expand...
What logic? My comment was about what happened, a drunk driver had an accident, that happens all the time, and unfortunately people die in such accidents all the time. It could not have been more mundane.
 
arthwollipot said:
Irrelevant. Anomaly Hunting is how you make spurious correlations between unrelated events. Anomaly hunters begin the hunt with the conclusion and look for the weird things that must be happening if it were true.

You didn't come up with all of these "strange" coincidences by yourself. I'm sure you read about them on blogs, or were told about them on YouTube videos or something. The actual originators of these theories are lost in time - most of them were first expressed shortly after Diana's death. But you've seen all of these people saying these things, a lot of different apparently "independent" (but not really) sources, and come to the conclusion that there is a consistent narrative behind them. Even if every anomalous event you have cited is absolutely true, there's no evidence of that narrative. And it's evidence that counts, not anomalies.
Click to expand...
My youngest 'step niece' got hit and her hair pulled the first day at kindergarten, and within the next month- the dad of the bully hit a kangaroo, writing off their new 4wd, their mum had to go into hospital for major surgery, a tree fell on their garage doing major damage, and two of their horses got out when another tree fell on their fence, one getting killed by a truck...

A string of coincidences???

Or 'maybe'....

My step niece is a member of the illumanatti and that was payback for hitting her???

NEVER PICK ON THE FIVE YEAR OLD GIRLS...
They have means of making you pay....

Hey it makes as much sense as the twaddle being peddled here lol
 
Cosmic Yak said:
Dude, just listen to yourself. Your claims have been comprehensively debunked, and what is your reaction? You will "generously" concede none of that, and instead try to shut down the conversation. Really? Is that the best you can do?
This is, again, coming from confirmation bias. Look it up. Educate yourself. Please.
Click to expand...

Everything about this post is completely incorrect. Completely.

For one thing, I didn't "try to shut down the conversation." At all.

You didn't debunk anything, either.

Confirmation bias doesn't apply here at all.

Though I admit I had an emotional reaction to what Juanita went through at the hands of the Democrats.
 
Last edited:
BartholomewWest said:
Everything about this post is completely incorrect. Completely.

For one thing, I didn't "try to shut down the conversation." At all.
Click to expand...

Yes, you did. You "generously" said you'd put Diana's death into the 'maybe' category, and then changed the subject.

As for the rest of my post: it is significant that you rarely, if ever, acknowledge the rebuttals to your various claims. Do you even read them? Specifically: Henri Paul being a spy, the traffic cameras being disabled in the cases of the deaths of Diana, and also Khashoggi, and the claim the NSA was spying on Diana. These have been shown to be false claims, provably false claims, yet you are ignoring this. You have yet to respond at all, to my recollection, and most probably still think those assertions are true. Have you looked at the evidence disproving your claims? What do you make of it?
Confirmation bias is not "completely incorrect" either. I would bet good money that you have not bothered to look it up, as I have suggested. Have you? If not, how can you claim it is "completely incorrect"?
 
Henri Paul was a spy. How else did 200,000 land in his back account!? He was paid 30,000 a year.

The NSA was spying on Diana.

Cameras do mysteriously fail to function when famous people die.

To be honest, I have no idea how you are even disputing this. This is information you can just Google.
 
BartholomewWest said:
Henri Paul was a spy. How else did 200,000 land in his back account!? He was paid 30,000 a year.
Click to expand...
Tips.
www.theguardian.com

Diana chauffeur received thousands of pounds in tips, inquest told

Parents of chauffeur Henri Paul tell inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, that large sums of cash found in their son's possession were generous tips, not payments by the security services for his part in a plot to murder her
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

The NSA was spying on Diana.
Click to expand...
Evidence?

Cameras do mysteriously fail to function when famous people die.
Click to expand...
You haven't shown that any did in this case.

To be honest, I have no idea how you are even disputing this. This is information you can just Google.
 
BartholomewWest said:
greensboro.com

SPY AGENCY DISCLOSES IT HAS SECRET PRINCESS DIANA FILE\ THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY'S REVELATION CAUSES AN UPROAR IN EUROPE.

The National Security Agency has disclosed that U.S. intelligence is holding 1,056 pages of classified information about the late Princess Diana, inspiring a flurry of sensational headlines this week across
greensboro.com greensboro.com

So far, your only valid criticism of me is that I didn't spell Juanita's name properly!
Click to expand...
Did you actually read that article?
 
You must be joking with me. You can't be serious.

You can't get 200,000 in tips. No way.

Not from rich people at the Ritz. Michael Jordan gives precisely $0.00 in tips.

Not only doesn't he tip, he thinks the waiter should be flattered he gets to serve him food. He thinks he is doing YOU a favor by being in your presence!

I think you've just lost any and all credibility with me.

Eta: Even people who don't think the crash was suspicious all agree that Henri was a spy! WTH.
 
Last edited:
BartholomewWest said:
Henri Paul was a spy. How else did 200,000 land in his back account!? He was paid 30,000 a year.

The NSA was spying on Diana.

Cameras do mysteriously fail to function when famous people die.

To be honest, I have no idea how you are even disputing this. This is information you can just Google.
Click to expand...

So I was- sadly- right. You didn't read a single link you were given, nor have you changed your mind in the face of the facts.
I also do not accept that you "honestly have no idea" why I am disputing your claims. I showed you why, with evidence. Are you honestly claiming you did not understand those articles? Or that you cannot for one moment imagine why I posted them? That beggars belief.
As for googling for information: that is exactly what I did, and that information flatly contradicts your assertions. Moreover, despite repeated request, you have yet to provide any sources at all for a great number of the things you claim to have seen. Why can you not do this? Can't you just google for that information?
 
BartholomewWest said:
Cameras do mysteriously fail to function when famous people die.
Click to expand...
And when, as in this case, they don't, people will just spread a rumour that they did anyway, which will only help reinforce the conviction that this often happens.

How many people do you suppose now believe 12 Paris traffic cameras mysteriously malfunctioned because you told them that false rumour?
 
Seriously, how can you even deny the spying allegations?

www.theguardian.com

US bugged Diana's phone on night of death crash

The American secret service was bugging Princess Diana's telephone conversations without the approval of the British security services on the night she died, according to the most comprehensive report on her death, to be published this week.
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Even the people who deny it was foul play say "of course she was under surveillance!"
 
BartholomewWest said:
Seriously, how can you even deny the spying allegations?

www.theguardian.com

US bugged Diana's phone on night of death crash

The American secret service was bugging Princess Diana's telephone conversations without the approval of the British security services on the night she died, according to the most comprehensive report on her death, to be published this week.
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Even the people who deny it was foul play say "of course she was under surveillance!"
Click to expand...
Can you be a bit less vague and more specific please? Which spying allegations exactly are you talking about, and who exactly is denying them?
 
zooterkin said:
Tips.
www.theguardian.com

Diana chauffeur received thousands of pounds in tips, inquest told

Parents of chauffeur Henri Paul tell inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, that large sums of cash found in their son's possession were generous tips, not payments by the security services for his part in a plot to murder her
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Evidence?


You haven't shown that any did in this case.

To be honest, I have no idea how you are even disputing this. This is information you can just Google.
Click to expand...

My late-cousin was the hotel manager of a well-known luxury hotel in Helsinki. No way did he get £8K in tips per month. The idea is ridiculous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom