• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Does 'rape culture' accurately describe (many) societies?

CONTENT WARNING: This film features content that viewers may find disturbing, including images and themes of simulated sexual abuse, incest, and sexual assault. Nudity has been blurred. Viewer discretion is strongly advised.​

Beyond Fantasy - Ep 1: "Barely Legal" | PORN INDUSTRY DOCUMENTARY​

The film is made by Magic Lantern Pictures with interviews by Benjamin Nolot who is an American filmmaker and the CEO and founder of Exodus Cry, a Christian social activist group focused on the issue of human trafficking, which has expressed opposition to the "entire global sex industry, including prostitution, pornography, and stripping".
 
Last edited:
Poem said:

CONTENT WARNING: This film features content that viewers may find disturbing, including images and themes of simulated sexual abuse, incest, and sexual assault. Nudity has been blurred. Viewer discretion is strongly advised.​

Beyond Fantasy - Ep 1: "Barely Legal" | PORN INDUSTRY DOCUMENTARY​

The film is made by Magic Lantern Pictures with interviews by Benjamin Nolot who is an American filmmaker and the CEO and founder of Exodus Cry, a Christian social activist group focused on the issue of human trafficking, which has expressed opposition to the "entire global sex industry, including prostitution, pornography, and stripping".
Click to expand...
"I'm not a Christian, but here's a film from a Christian group that I fully endorse, and want you all to watch!" :xrolleyes
Poem: what was the point of linking to this film? Are you advocating porn?
 
It's noteworthy that nobody is engaging with the substance of the film.
 
Ziggurat said:
Assuming the rise in rapes in the UK is real and not an artifact of reporting changes, do you have evidence that porn is a significant contributor? Because I can think of other possible factors. For example, with the whole grooming gangs scandal, I don't recall hearing anything about porn being a factor. But I do recall another politically inconvenient factor at play: immigrants from Muslim countries.

In other words, the UK seems to have imported actual rape culture from countries where rape culture means actual rape.
Click to expand...
Remains undemonstrated.
 
The film states:
The fictional depiction of minors in pornography is illegal in most countries

And yet, as noted a number of times previously, such depictions are rife on mainstream porn sites (Barnardos). It's clear that society is normalizing and trivializing what is illegal in most countries. That's rape culture.

The First Amendment, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, is not fit for purpose.

Ziggurat said:
Leaving aside the issue of a rather expansive definition of sexualizing children (putting a stuffed animal in the hands of a clearly adult porn actress doesn't actually make them look like a child), this conclusion is not in any way demonstrated. It looks to me much akin to the whole "video games cause violence" claims that ambulance-chasing lawyers pushed for a quick buck but which fell apart upon scrutiny.
Click to expand...
You got this wrong.
 
Last edited:
I'm not a Christian, but here's a film from a Christian group that I fully endorse, and want you all to watch!" :xrolleyes
Poem: what was the point of linking to this film? Are you advocating porn?

This poster continues to struggle to make a substantive and relevant point.
#1,734
 
Last edited:
theprestige said:
A Christian activist takes it upon himself to collect and edit images of (simulated) sexual abuse, incest, and sexual assault.

How much you want to bet he's kept un-blurred copies for his personal archives?
Click to expand...
An ad hominem.
 
How many are complicit in propagating this? Nina Hartley admits she “needed the work that week”
 
Last edited:
Poem said:
The First Amendment, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, is not fit for purpose.
Click to expand...

Then the solution is simple. Conquer the U.S., declare yourself Führer, and abolish the First Amendment. Then you can enact whatever tyrannical censorship laws your authoritarian heart desires.

For my part, I sincerely hope anyone attempting such would be promptly and efficiently killed by our national defense forces.
 
Myriad said:
Then the solution is simple. Conquer the U.S., declare yourself Führer, and abolish the First Amendment. Then you can enact whatever tyrannical censorship laws your authoritarian heart desires.

For my part, I sincerely hope anyone attempting such would be promptly and efficiently killed by our national defense forces.
Click to expand...
The only conquering and tyranny that is actually going on is porn and the type of material featured in the Nolot film - available in countries that ban it.

If you want to make a serious point about the documentary then go ahead.
 
Last edited:
Poem said:
The only conquering and tyranny that is actually going on is porn and the type of material featured in the Nolot film - available in countries that ban it.

If you want to make a serious point about the documentary then go ahead.
Click to expand...

Why talk about a documentary? I'm talking about your expressed desire to overrule or replace or disregard the First Amendment. That's tyranny, and it's a point that you yourself have chosen to raise, and that's much more important to me as a U.S. citizen than my opinion about some documentary or your opinion about law enforcement effectiveness in other countries.
 
Myriad said:
Why talk about a documentary? I'm talking about your expressed desire to overrule or replace or disregard the First Amendment. That's tyranny, and it's a point that you yourself have chosen to raise, and that's much more important to me as a U.S. citizen than my opinion about some documentary or your opinion about law enforcement effectiveness in other countries.
Click to expand...
It was the Supreme Court that upheld a lower court's decision that the CPPA violated free speech - leading to the sort of porn featured in the documentary. But, of course, the real problem is world-wide societal demand.

You appear to be drunk on protecting such free speech; even when it leads to very, very bad outcomes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom