• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Predict Trump's first revenge prosecutions!

Liz Cheney's reply to Trump

January 6th showed Donald Trump for who is really is - a cruel and vindictive man who allowed violent attacks to continue against our Capitol and law enforcement officers while he watched television and refused for hours to instruct his supporters to stand down and leave.
The January 6th Committee's hearings and report featured scores of republican witnesses, including many of the most senior officials from Trump's own White House, campaign and Administration. All of this testimony was painstakingly set out in thousands of pages of transcripts, made public along with a highly detailed and meticulously sourced 800 page report.
The Department of Justice conducted its own independent investigation and reached the same fundamental conclusions.
Now, Chairman Loudermilk's 'Interim Report' intentionally disregards the truth and the Select Committee's tremendous weight of evidence, and instead fabricates lies and defamatory allegations in an attempt to cover up what Donald Trump did. Their allegations do not reflect a review of the actual evidence, and are a malicious and cowardly assault on the truth.
No reputable lawyer, legislator or judge would take this seriously." Liz Cheney
Click to expand...
 
It's looking bad for Liz

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Liz Cheney has been exposed in the Interim Report, by Congress, of the J6 Unselect Committee as having done egregious and unthinkable acts of crime. At the same time, however, she helped the Democrats lose the Election by giving her support - She is so unpopular and disgusting, a real loser!
Click to expand...
 
Andy_Ross said:
It's looking bad for Liz
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Liz Cheney has been exposed in the Interim Report, by Congress, of the J6 Unselect Committee as having done egregious and unthinkable acts of crime. At the same time, however, she helped the Democrats lose the Election by giving her support - She is so unpopular and disgusting, a real loser!
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
The worst thing in Trump's eyes is to be a "loser". Also, he didn't write that. He doesn't know the word "egregious". Sounds like a flunky-edited rant.
 
Last edited:
TragicMonkey said:
When asked about the egregious, Trump replied "Very fine people, the egregians, some of them".
Click to expand...
Ancient egregian vase, showing peace negotiations in what is now known as Panama.
wringg8t0cz31.jpg
 
Bump! We've gotta be getting close now, what's your bet?
Just guess a category:
Political opponents? Hillary, Kamala, Biden, Dem congresscritters, RINO's?
Those who've prosecuted/persecuted him? Judges, prosecutors, FBI, etc?
Journalists or commentators? He hates lots of those.
Maybe someone in government? Can't be enough just to fire them!
 
Trebuchet said:
Bump! We've gotta be getting close now, what's your bet?
Just guess a category:
Political opponents? Hillary, Kamala, Biden, Dem congresscritters, RINO's?
Those who've prosecuted/persecuted him? Judges, prosecutors, FBI, etc?
Journalists or commentators? He hates lots of those.
Maybe someone in government? Can't be enough just to fire them!
Click to expand...
Problem is, if he goes after someone and loses in court (which he could very well do... the US justice system is broken but convictions are not guaranteed) it will harm both his reputation and his ego.

Its quite possible he will do what he did with Hillary Clinton in his first term... spend the time sniping at various targets, but never actually pulling the trigger on any sort of prosecution.
 
Segnosaur said:
Problem is, if he goes after someone and loses in court (which he could very well do... the US justice system is broken but convictions are not guaranteed) it will harm both his reputation and his ego.

Its quite possible he will do what he did with Hillary Clinton in his first term... spend the time sniping at various targets, but never actually pulling the trigger on any sort of prosecution.
Click to expand...
A good point, but there's always venue shopping.
 
Trebuchet said:
Problem is, if he goes after someone and loses in court (which he could very well do... the US justice system is broken but convictions are not guaranteed) it will harm both his reputation and his ego.
Click to expand...
A good point, but there's always venue shopping.
Click to expand...
I will defer to legal experts, but I think they are kind of restricted when it comes to venue shopping in criminal cases, since the location has to be associated with crime that was committed. (So they would have a hard time convicting Fauci or Cheney in North Dakota since none of their supposed crimes were associated with that location, regardless of how many right-wing jury members they could find.)
 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Liz Cheney has been exposed in the Interim Report, by Congress, of the J6 Unselect Committee as having done egregious and unthinkable acts of crime. At the same time, however, she helped the Democrats lose the Election by giving her support - She is so unpopular and disgusting, a real loser!
Click to expand...
STFU, felon.
 
Segnosaur said:
I will defer to legal experts, but I think they are kind of restricted when it comes to venue shopping in criminal cases, since the location has to be associated with crime that was committed.
Click to expand...
Correct. For federal criminal charges, Fed. R. Crim. P. 18 requires the charges to be brought in the district where the crime occurred. If this is ambiguous, the venue is the district in which the major part of the crime was allegedly committed. It's that "major part" that leads to arguments over proper venue. Since federal criminal cases generally involve interstate activity and commerce, this can be slightly difficult. But it's not the same as civil cases where everyone just goes to Amarillo, Texas.

Segnosaur said:
(So they would have a hard time convicting Fauci or Cheney in North Dakota since none of their supposed crimes were associated with that location, regardless of how many right-wing jury members they could find.)
Click to expand...
The D.C. district court would be the proper venue for charges of criminal activity while engaged in government service in Washington D.C.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom