Donald Trump

The Great Zaganza said:
Trump picks 3rd rate Fox host Hegseth to be in charge of the most powerful military in the world.

In his role, he will fight the most evil enemy the US military as ever faced: too woke US soldiers.
The second enemy to be vanquished is Veteran Healthcare, which of course should be run privately for profit.

Unqualified doesn't begin to describe this.
Click to expand...
He also wants to pardon soldiers accused of war crimes :( .
 
I didn't think it was possible to be more horrified at who our Government people in charge will be, until now. Matt Gaetz for AG???
 
stanfr said:
It is not meant to intimidate him, because Trump is incapable of feeling intimidated. If 90% of the electorate had rejected him, he would have still claimed he won. It's meant to mock him--that is why the state media 'reporters' who aired the pics were laughing at it. The AI memes of Putin walking Trump like a lost dog will be next.
Click to expand...
it's not meant to intimidate him. putin owns trump, he'll disrespect him and trump won't say or do anything. he won't get mad, he'll never mention it. he'll shake putin's hand next time he sees him and ask him what he needs next. that's what this is about
 
I wonder when The Party send their senators and congressmen to Russia to pay their homage to Putin like they did the first time Trump was elected.
 
dirtywick said:
it's not meant to intimidate him. putin owns trump, he'll disrespect him and trump won't say or do anything. he won't get mad, he'll never mention it. he'll shake putin's hand next time he sees him and ask him what he needs next. that's what this is about
Click to expand...
We might have to fight a second war of Independence. Red Dawn for real.
 
stanfr said:
Yep, let the fascist takeover begin. That's why I think it is foolish for the Dems to play nice and act with 'civility'--they should give the opposition the war they want.
Click to expand...
That would mean a lot of Dems reconsidering their stance on Gun Ownership, though.......
 
I've been reading some of the comments in the MSN forum, and from what I understand, if trump keeps picking his cabinet from the House, he may lose control of it or end up with it so close, that he may not be able to get all his "agenda" enacted.

From what I also understand is that the Governors can't replace them. They can only replace Senators.

If I'm wrong, please correct me.


-
 
AmyStrange said:
I've been reading some of the comments in the MSN forum, and from what I understand, if trump keeps picking his cabinet from the House, he may lose control of it or end up with it so close, that he may not be able to get all his "agenda" enacted.

From what I also understand is that the Governors can't replace them. They can only replace Senators.

If I'm wrong, please correct me.


-
Click to expand...
House vacancies have to be filled by special elections...which, in case of death, means that district will go without representation for a few months.
 
dudalb said:
House vacancies have to be filled by special elections...which, in case of death, means that district will go without representation for a few months.
Click to expand...

That's what they also said in the MSN forums.

Thank you.


-
 
Im
AmyStrange said:
Having TWO people run the Department of "Efficiency" doesn't seem very "efficient" to me.


-
Click to expand...
Trump has a history of giving the same job to two people - thinks it's a brilliant manager strategy to have them compete against each other for your approval.
In the case of these sad excuses for men, it might even work.
 
Ziggurat said:
Sounds to me like a play for Putin's domestic audience then. Which, sure, go for it Putin. Get that propaganda win!

Not sure why the rest of the world should care. I don't think they will.
Click to expand...
Well, yes, it was on Russian domestic TV, was it not? The only reason it's interesting to anyone else is the disrespect it implies for Trump. You could doubtless find stuff much more disrespectful about Trump on TV in just about any other country, but those countries haven't Russian style state control of their media and aren't anxiously looking forward to Trump gifting them a way out of their own folly in Ukraine.
 
Darat said:
I thought that republican policy was talked about prior to the election?
Click to expand...


How can my fellow republicans (the bastards) talk about anything coherently if they're asleep?


ETA: I think it's time for the sleeping maga weirdoes to come up with a different word to "own the libs," because this one (woke) is just too easy to make fun of that also makes them look even stupider than they already are.


-
 
Last edited:
The Great Zaganza said:
Im

Trump has a history of giving the same job to two people - thinks it's a brilliant manager strategy to have them compete against each other for your approval.
In the case of these sad excuses for men, it might even work.
Click to expand...

Somebody else from history famously adopted a similar "rats in a sack" management approach - and like Trump he also had a fondness for bunkers - and things didn't turn out so well for him.

Of course comparisons between Trump and that individual are specious at best - the other individual demonstrated at least some form of warmth towards animals and didn't have to resort to a "weave" (either to disguise his bald spot or to attempt to obfuscate his cognitive decline).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom