• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: 2024 Election Thread part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
His cultists don't give a **** about the Republican party. He is their demigod. The chosen one. The new messiah. The party is just a tool to be used to further his and their goals. Dubya and Dick Cheney are not of "his party."

This is why, if Trump loses, there'll be no surprise when Trump and his cult bolt from the GOP. They will blame the party's lack of purity for the loss. The GOP is ******. The GOP leashed themselves to the leopard that is going to eat their faces.

All true (no snark) but regardless there doesn't seem to be enough of a schism forming in the Trumpers/Traditional Republicans to do any damage.

Compared to the popular "Circular Firing Squad" metaphor for the Dems it seems the GOP can't tear itself apart no matter how hard it tries.
 
I've seen it said that the the Dems let the rivers just run in to the sea all that water oing to waste.

Yes, that's why the Democrats have been pushing to build the Sites reservoir for almost a half a century.
 
Water? That stuff will sink Battleships. Besides I'm pretty sure meth goes better with whiskey.
 
About time for some good news!

If former President Donald Trump loses the election in November, would he run again in four years?

No. At least that’s what he told an interviewer last week.

...

And it ended with Attkisson asking Trump whether he sees himself running again in 2028 if his current presidential bid — his third in a row — is unsuccessful.

“No, I don't. No, I don't,” Trump said. “I think that that will be, that will be it. I don't see that at all. I think that hopefully we're gonna be successful.”

Granted it's Trump and he's completely and entirely full of absolute ****, but I don't think he'd run again in 4 years either. Not because he wouldn't want to but because he literally can't. I don't think he'd have the physical or mental capacity to handle it.
 
Last edited:
Ok, help me out here, people - I need a word that conveys more than tsunami or landslide. They're both almost good words for what's coming, but still don't convey the utter crushing Trump/MAGA/Republicans are going to receive.

Just to reinforce the point, Senate Republicans have emphasised their misogynist credentials at the same time as the Fed acknowledging the economic situation and dealing Harris a pocket pair.

I'm sure there will be a couple of hold-out states, but any claims of election interference will be laughable in the face of such an overwhelming beating.
'Deluge'?
 
About time for some good news!



Granted it's Trump and he's completely and entirely full of absolute ****, but I don't think he'd run again in 4 years either. Not because he wouldn't want to but because he literally can't. I don't think he'd have the physical or mental capacity to handle it.

He wouldn't need any 'capacity' at all, if he wanted to run he would have an AI robot do all of his campaigning. He'd just sit on a couch and eat Cheetos while constantly sending out all-cap Tweets.

But he knows he won't run again if he loses, because he will be in jail. Which is why, in his mind, if he cannot lose. He will declare complete victory (in a "landslide") regardless of the outcome. I foresee it will all come down to some sort of bunker-like last days in which it will all come to a violent end, if a stroke doesn't take him out first.
 
About time for some good news!



Granted it's Trump and he's completely and entirely full of absolute ****, but I don't think he'd run again in 4 years either. Not because he wouldn't want to but because he literally can't. I don't think he'd have the physical or mental capacity to handle it.

He doesn't have the physical or mental capacity now.

And if he loses, he will declare victory anyway and expect that his cultists will rise up violently, and some of them will.
 
Republicans don't really care about illegal immigration, otherwise they would've passed the bi-partisan bill to address it. It's having the issue as political tool that they care about, not actually solving it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom