arthwollipot
Limerick Purist
I assume because...
Thanks, but I'd like to hear from the people to whom I asked the question.Because...
I assume because...
Thanks, but I'd like to hear from the people to whom I asked the question.Because...
Interesting.
Through the looking glass and they say the same thing.
Megan Kelly discussed with Nate Silver today.i don't doubt that, and i think to a certain extent that's expected. and to a certain extent i don't think it's a problem. for example, when the dems pass a bill i'd expect when the news is explaining what the bill is and how it effects people, a left leaning news sources coverage would put more emphasis on the pros of the bill and a right leaning ones the cons. a certain amount of bias is unavoidable, and i think it's even useful in connecting people with the news.
on the other hand, if there was some scandal even close to the magnitude and severity of how closely fox news was working with the trump campaign, i'd like to hear about it.
both sides the same? no, but they're similar.
In the same way an ice cube is similar to an iceberg.both sides the same? no, but they're similar.
There’s a meme that says: “Universal health care is such a complex beast that only 32 of the world's 33 developed nations have been able to make it work.”
Admittedly, not all of those 32 developed nations have been able to make it work well. Great Britain in particular seems to have major issues.
But as I said, it should be aspirational to find a way towards it that works. Too many Americans can’t afford the care or medications they need, leading to poor outcomes down the road. Or even early death. Let’s at least try.
In the same way an ice cube is similar to an iceberg.
Megan Kelly discussed with Nate Silver today.
He said january 6 was a full stop for voting Trump.
Kelly said The Border and transitioning children to the opposite sex was a full stop for her voting Harris.
Go figure, the economy is always irrelevant.
Most people I know agree.The difference between Nate and Megyn is that Nate's "full stop" actually happened.
I don't see the point in turning this into a Hillary thread, it's old news.Such as?
Why?
Kamala is now talking about clamping down on the border a bit, she needs to get it done before the election, otherwise she is open to charges of inaction the last four years. Yes I know the Republicans nixed the last border bill but that isn't the end of the matter.I'm just pointing out that she's not soft on Immigration. I'd say the only reason we have the immigration problems we have is because of Republicans, but that is a gross oversimplification.
I wish people would understand that a significant amount of our immigration problems is a direct result of our foreign policies. That and the Catholic Church and it's opposition to birth control.
Most people I know agree.
It is a question of follow the greatest evil to a conclusion.
Notably Nate voting for Harris follows a principled life of gambling, and finding comfort in a fraternity of privileged entitled non sufferers of the need to work.
Kamala is now talking about clamping down on the border a bit, she needs to get it done before the election, otherwise she is open to charges of inaction the last four years. Yes I know the Republicans nixed the last border bill but that isn't the end of the matter.
To be clear, the cults are Islam, BLM, and another one...
We all might quibble about the significance, but it's not nonsense. It's not unreasonable that VPs are held to the policies of their administration. This is something that lots of voters care about (though not me). Fair or not, it's a vulnerability.That's ignorant nonsense. She can not do anything more than her opposition. As VP, she has ZERO authority to do ANYTHING. She is NOT the Executive. She can not implement policy. She can not issue executive orders, she can not pass legislation.
I too would be interested in an answer.Such as?
Intelligent, capable, successful women who aren't merely ornaments for men terrify a lot of men. Pathet men, true, but they tend to be vocal and vehement.Why?
That's ignorant nonsense. Why is it that so many Americans do not understand our government and how it works? She can not do anything more than her opposition. As VP, she has ZERO authority to do ANYTHING. She is NOT the Executive. She can not implement policy. She can not issue executive orders, she can not pass legislation.
OK.Hilary Clinton is not the topic of this thread. Get back to the topic of this thread.Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic Posted By: Darat
And that's presumably part of why she apparently hasn't published a lot of details yet about her own policies: She's still in the process of balancing how much to stamp her name on Biden's and how much to deviate from them (while he is still her boss).It's not unreasonable that VPs are held to the policies of their administration.
Put it in a Hillary thread.{Hillary stuff}
Haven’t you heard? She’s been instrumental in Biden’s policies. It’s been the Biden-Harris team all along.