• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

NZ Politics, the Luxon Era

Samson said:
That is a poorly researched post.
I am against almost all trans body modification for commonsense reasons. Maybe you are conflating that idea.
In the New Zealand context I see three flourishing cults.
Maorification.
Genderfication.
Islamism.
The 3rd is a sleeper.
Click to expand...

There are only two* fully active, public cults in NZ.... Destiny Church, and Gloriavale - both of whom hold similar views to your own with regards to the LGBT community.

And really? Islamism? A sleeper cult? Bwhahahahaha!

*ETA: You could possibly also count EBs as a cult, I suppose.
 
Last edited:
smartcooky said:
There are only two* fully active, public cults in NZ.... Destiny Church, and Gloriavale - both of whom hold similar views to your own with regards to the LGBT community.

And really? Islamism? A sleeper cult? Bwhahahahaha!

*ETA: You could possibly also count EBs as a cult, I suppose.
Click to expand...
Gloriavale is a minor cult with local impact.
Maorification and Genderfication are full blown cults ripping the heart out of this country.
Islamism will in the next 20 years.
Communism will not arrive, but is destroying China.

Destiny Church is completely irrelevant, but probably a net positive.
 
Last edited:
Samson said:
On the critical thinking course there are 3 sources.
A student, a philosophy professor, and a member of faculty.
I asked the prof to formalise the issue somewhat.
Click to expand...

So, no actual evidence, just hearsay.

When you have some evidence, let me know.
 
This is the wife of Maori Party leader, Rawiri Waititi.

Warning - contains a lot of swearing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VDLdbiyKFk

One thing really sticks out to me - the genius statement that Maori are divided by Pakeha.

Yeah right. Maori didn't fight and eat each other prior to white people arriving, did they?
 
The Atheist said:
This is the wife of Maori Party leader, Rawiri Waititi.

Warning - contains a lot of swearing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VDLdbiyKFk

One thing really sticks out to me - the genius statement that Maori are divided by Pakeha.

Yeah right. Maori didn't fight and eat each other prior to white people arriving, did they?
Click to expand...
I see a way forward.
I recall an advertisement in the remuera local paper around 1998.
Learn phonics.
So we took our daughter 20 minutes one on one for maybe 20 lessons
She could read (english) fluently before she got to Parnell primary/intermediate.
Then we did the same for the son 2 years later.

I asked the teacher, jolly phonics was the course, is there any such thing as dyslexia.
NO she said, not one child ever failed her course.

26 years on nothing has changed.
The prisons would be empty if the communities used this course in a parent volunteering way.
Now.
Forget Te Reo, it is fake as ****
 
Samson said:
He backed off for fear of doxxing.
In essence, what I sketched is resoundingly true and provable.

And I bet you believe.
Click to expand...

No, I don't believe a word of it.

The complete lack of evidence isn't likely to change my mind.
 
The Atheist said:
This is the wife of Maori Party leader, Rawiri Waititi.

Warning - contains a lot of swearing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VDLdbiyKFk

One thing really sticks out to me - the genius statement that Maori are divided by Pakeha.

Yeah right. Maori didn't fight and eat each other prior to white people arriving, did they?
Click to expand...

What an absolute piece of **** this woman is!

Best comment: "This what happens when you live a privileged life and realize the gravy train is drying up"
 
Samson said:
He backed off for fear of doxxing.
In essence, what I sketched is resoundingly true and provable.

And I bet you believe.
Click to expand...

Hilarious gibberish. TA is right, you have a particular monomania and you will listen to anyone who agrees with you on it no matter what their other views are or how spurious their reasoning is. You've already admitted to only listening to sources you already agree with so I wonder why are you even here?
 
The Atheist said:
Which is nothing like your original claim:



As I thought, you just made something up.
Click to expand...
Not really.
Imagine a brain surgeon vested with care for your grandchild.
Imagine a plane at 35000 feet carrying your grand child.
This is the point of ridiculing scholarship of emergent properties.
 
Samson said:
Not really.
Imagine a brain surgeon vested with care for your grandchild.
Imagine a plane at 35000 feet carrying your grand child.
This is the point of ridiculing scholarship of emergent properties.
Click to expand...

Absolute drivel. How does this connect to your argument?
 
Samson said:
Not really.
Imagine a brain surgeon vested with care for your grandchild.
Imagine a plane at 35000 feet carrying your grand child.
This is the point of ridiculing scholarship of emergent properties.
Click to expand...

This is just another one of your pathetic attempts at meaningless five-dimensional word salad.
 
Our party policy promotes the following ideas

At the Annual Conference, will discuss and vote on issues such as:

Ø campaigning for a ban on puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for under-18s

Ø lobbying for support services for detransitioners, and for women who want to leave gangs and religious cults

Ø opposing inclusion of “gender identity” in legislation

Ø campaigning for a ban on “rough sex” as a defence in murder cases

Ø raising awareness of the damaging effects of “social transitioning” in schools

Ø calling for reform of the Working for Families package

Ø advocating for effective policies to deliver pay equity

Ø addressing inequity of retirement savings for women
 
Samson said:
Our party policy promotes the following ideas
Click to expand...

Bully for you and your party.

What fraction of a percent support this amazing party? (The answer is 0.08, by the way)

When 99.9% of women don't vote for The Women's Rights Party, I'd say they've failed, so whatever their loony policies are is 100% irrelevant.

Glad you found a home, though. Jill Ovens is an excellent person.

:dl:
 
The Atheist said:
Bully for you and your party.

What fraction of a percent support this amazing party? (The answer is 0.08, by the way)

When 99.9% of women don't vote for The Women's Rights Party, I'd say they've failed, so whatever their loony policies are is 100% irrelevant.

Glad you found a home, though. Jill Ovens is an excellent person.

:dl:
Click to expand...

Samson's list from his party's manifesto seem fine to me. Its the parts that are not mentioned which I can't abide by, such as

1. the rolling back of Gay rights

2. lobbying to repeal the 2013 Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Act 2013, thereby removing the right to same-sex marriage.

3. lobbying to repeal the Prostitution Reform Act 2003, thereby making prostitution a crime. They want to replace it with the abomination known as the "Nordic Model".

They don't mention these things, but they are almost certainly part of the agenda.
 
Things are going from bad to worse for Te Pāti Māori...

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/poli...t-to-bottom-of-te-p-ti-m-ori-allegations.html

They are now under investigation by

The Public Service Commission,
The Police,
Statistics NZ,
The Privacy Commissioner, and
The Electoral Commission.


Meanwhile Tamihere bleats about racism, nothing to see here. The problem for them, is that there are too many complainants/witnesses to what they did.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom