This really came from the head of the EPA, not Genocide Joe himself. I just put it in his thread because it is "his" EPA and one could presume that they discussed this ahead of time, and it seems to have been about a year since Hidin' Biden himself has done anything in particular.
Those that can't afford gas or groceries and are struggling to pay the rent...
The actual sinking state of the economy, as opposed to the rosy one they want to gaslight us with, is indeed a problem for him, only made worse by the surreal gaslighting about it. But it's a different subject from the one we're on at the moment.
...buy a $100K electric car.
False, in at least three ways: there are no proposals to require anybody to buy an electric car, electric cars are already less expensive than you claim, and this proposed EPA rule would reduce their costs even more by widening the market for them and thus giving manufacturers incentive to widen their marketing approach.
He should have promoted hybrids.
To the extent that a proposed EPA rule is Genocide Joe promoting any particular vehicle type at all, what you're saying "should" happen is exactly what's happening. The main effect of this rule would be incentivizing hybrids, especially plug-ins, by incentivizing
both them and electrics together (and thus also the choice between them) in a country where electrics just aren't usable for most people and the power system isn't ready for too many of them yet.
there are hard limits to what you can do there with many battery components existing in limited quantities on the Earth's surface.
I have run into a few articles lately about ways to make batteries of more easily available materials, but I don't know how many years those would be from the market, or how their charging schedule or power-to-weight ratio would compare.
We need to get to a model where the vast majority of Americans do not have to drive at all. Not easy since our existing infrastructure has been built around cars for almost a century.
Also, our culture values cars in a way that other countries do not. It has made it very hard to build an infrastructure of mass transit.
I've been in places like that. The convenience is definitely cool. But the amount of leaves & plants & wind & sky in my life being about equivalent to the world of Soylent Green would be lifelong torture.
And even aside from the psychological-health thing, it only kicks the can down the road anyway. Public transit based on fossil fuels runs into the same problem as personal vehicles based on fossil fuels, just not at the same time. The only way to avoid it is electric vehicles, on either scale, so the scale is not the point; only the electrification is.
(Also, when we run out of fossil fuel, we also run out of the raw material from which we make our roads and all plastics, but nobody ever seems to talk about that...)