JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
No, this came about because YOU demanded to know what my qualifications were and squeezed the information out of me, interrogating me as to their content. I don't think they are relevant on a chat forum discussing a current affairs topic.
If I were to say I was an artist, can you dispute that? No. Just as you cannot dispute my being a scientist.
I vigorously dispute your claim to be a scientist, for the reasons I’ve given, and which you have failed to refute. You cannot demonstrate even the slightest correct understanding of the scientific subjects you raise in connection with your arguments, nor any facility with actual scientific methodology.
You are not discussing current affairs. You are proposing a conspiracy theory predicated in large part on your unmet expectations which in turn derive from ignorance of the underlying physical and scientific properties. You are judging the actions of others and the propriety of physical events without first laying the foundation for your judgment. It is therefore proper to challenge you for foundation.
You are the one attempting to satisfy that inquiry by inflating credentials that do not mean what you say they mean.
As long as you insist on basing your arguments on the premise that you know what you're talking about on scientific subjects, i will continue to point out that you do not, and have not in any way qualified yourself to lecture others on those subjects. If you cannot understand how that constitutes a refutation of your position, then I cannot help you.
Last edited: