Not a Swiftie, but it seems a fine choice.
I can find not a single thing objectionable about her.
Well, she's way prettier and more accomplished than I am, so **** her!
Not a Swiftie, but it seems a fine choice.
I can find not a single thing objectionable about her.
Not a Swiftie, but it seems a fine choice.
I can find not a single thing objectionable about her.
Hold up y'all! Looks like we have a Devil's Advocate.
Not everyone is a fan of Taylor Swift's Epic victory.
Behold!
My source is the Daily Fail, but it does seem to come from a genuine Xweet.
What say you, Swifty apologists?
Saira Rao is out there busting her butt having dinner parties in which she castigates white women for their evils, and yet the one woman who could end all pain and suffering in the world is being feted on Time Magazine. Can you believe this!?
It would be enough to make Robin DeAngelo cry if white women tears was not an act of violence against the Palestinians!
While I'd have her in the upper tier of celebrities and all around excellent humans, I have to confess that I can't recall a single specific, tangible thing she's done. I can tick off reams of others who made wide societal impacts, one way or the other. I'm sure I could Google her and find an impressive list, but seems like a Person of the Year shouldn't need to introduce their specific accomplishments.
That's not how it should work. According to Time magazine itself, 'the criterion is the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill, and embodied what was important about the year'. Being a good person is – or should be – far from enough to qualify.
Sometimes an amazingly popular good person is just what the world needs.
That's still not how it should work. Is she the most influential person this year?
That's still not how it should work. Is she the most influential person this year?
"Taylor Swift is a singer-songwriter with a millions-strong fanbase, who sells out stadiums with her performances. She's probably one of the biggest entertainers in existence right now."
"Yeah, but does she actually do anything?"
Gaga does, also, have a pretty amazing voice. She's another one whom I'm like, not my kinda music, but I hear the talent.
You don’t think she should be ending genocide with an Instagram post?
That's still not how it should work. Is she the most influential person this year?
While I'd have her in the upper tier of celebrities and all around excellent humans, I have to confess that I can't recall a single specific, tangible thing she's done. I can tick off reams of others who made wide societal impacts, one way or the other. I'm sure I could Google her and find an impressive list, but seems like a Person of the Year shouldn't need to introduce their specific accomplishments.
You're a hard bloke to please.
If she'd trumpeted her achievements and altruism you'd be saying it was carefully curated to give a favourable impression.
She doesn't, so you're asking what she's done that's so admirable!
Trust me, I don't fall in love with celebrities and she had to do a lot to win me over from the insipid bubblegum country Conservative America's sweetheart bible-thumping image she started out with.
By that criteria, the winner should be Vladimir Putin.
Isn't the point of the thing to drum up interest in "Time" magazine? Not that it works: it just drums up interest in Taylor Swift. I learned a lot more about her in this thread than I knew before.
I’ll bet a slew of Swifties will attempt to collect all the cover versions of the magazine.
I hear every word of that. But when I get on this forum, I'm specifically tuning in to being critical in my thinking.
I hear TS is PotY, and my first gut reaction is "it couldn't be bestowed on a better person. She's generous AF, great positive role model, and all that". Just seems a little weird that I can't name a single charity she has unquestionably given to. So I'm questioning why I have such a knee jerk positive vibe about her.
I can list reasons for disliking Kanye, or liking Keanu. But I'm drawing a blank with Swift, other than a general very good feeling.
I think it's more just to be a contrarian on almost every issue, but I digress. Skepticism isn't just arguing against something, just so you know.
Have you ever, like...you know, looked? Ever put in any actual effort to find that information? Anyway, you have a "knee jerk positive vibe about her" because she's genuinely a positive person, and has that effect on people around her. However, here's an article about her various donations to food banks and cancer patients on her Era's tour (previously mentioned). Here's a bit of a timeline going over some of the random things she's done. I mean, the internet is ******* littered with article after article of things she's done. Most of them generally state that she goes out of her way to NOT make them public. She doesn't want everyone knowing, she just wants to help people.
Because you've either never bothered looking, or just don't care. Either are fine, but it's pretty well documented.