Steve
Penultimate Amazing
It has far more to do with rain....
No. See post 1305.
It has far more to do with rain....
Very well then, what is your point on that matter? For example, tell us how many cars were already alight by the time the fire brigade's first fire fighting efforts began.
page 19From initial observations, CCTV and open Social Media sources it could be seen that
the fire, once sufficiently developed, moved rapidly up through the structure. Early
thoughts around this concentrated on vehicles being parked on the ramps between
floors as a possible factor in fire spread.
BBC reported an eye witness who saw the fire as he descended into the airport and he said he saw a fire engine on the top level, so they could get in.
What exactly does 'permeated the ceiling' mean? What report are you attempting to describe?
What exactly does 'permeated the ceiling' mean? What report are you attempting to describe?
People saw fire on the top open air level around 21:00 (first call 20:47).
The eye witness was mistaken. There are height restrictions, and a fire engine exceeds them by miles.
For example, Birmingham airport:
The maximum height limit for Car Park 1 is 2.15m with bays being 2.9m in width x 4.82m in length.
The maximum height limit for Car Park 2 is 2.05m with bays being 2.8m in width x 4.62m in length
The maximum height limit for Car Park 3 is 2.05m with bays being 2.9m in width x 4.57m in length
link
BBC 11 Oct 2023Russell Taylor, 41, an account director, saw the flames after flying in to Luton from Edinburgh.
He told the PA news agency: "There were a couple of fire engines with a car ablaze on the upper floor of the car park at just after 21:00
"A few minutes later most of the upper floor was alight, car alarms were going off with loud explosions from cars going up in flames."
I am sure that is true for Birmingham but nonetheless an early eye-witness at the scene of the Luton fire states:
BBC 11 Oct 2023
Make of that what you will.
BBC reported an eye witness who saw the fire as he descended into the airport and he said he saw a fire engine on the top level, so they could get in.
Russell Taylor, 41, an account director, saw the flames after flying in to Luton from Edinburgh.
He told the PA news agency: "There were a couple of fire engines with a car ablaze on the upper floor of the car park at just after 21:00
"A few minutes later most of the upper floor was alight, car alarms were going off with loud explosions from cars going up in flames."
You're striving hard to miss the point. The video illustrated how fiercely modern cars burn if they catch fire.
Car catches fire in a parkade. Subsequent events occur as expected. The entire world bar one person understands what happened. One person, who sees conspiracies everywhere and is an expert on everything, views the event as nefarious and makes bizarre, uneducated and unjustified comments. 1300+ posts later nothing has been accomplished. Seems we have seen this before.
You obviously misunderstand. The report is saying cars parked on the ramps between levels might have provided a way for fire to spread from car to car and thus from level to level.Drawing from the Liverpool ECHO car park fire report by Merseyside Fire Brigade, actually being parked on a ramp is not good:
page 19
So, the Luton car, if the image is authentic (and this has not been verified), was parked at right angles to the parking bays on a ramp arriving at Level 3, where it is already on fire towards the front of the vehicle. The Fire Brigade would appear to consider such a 'parking spot' to be a factor in fire spread.
With flames shooting out to the sides low down and at the high temperatures associated with a lithium fire, then this would soon be uncontainable despite all best efforts.
Would sprinklers have helped? Almost certainly, if only to slow the spread down in other parts of the car park and other levels. Fire hates water.
We are at the point at which a sorcerer controlling a fire elemental is more sensible than Vixen's musings.
Consider what might have been different if they had arrived to find the burning car three floors up in a structure their truck couldn't enter, and if there were other cars within a couple of metres, and if a roof was keeping more of the heat in.
fire brigade access by Username Vixen, on FlickrMake of that what you will.
You obviously misunderstand. The report is saying cars parked on the ramps between levels might have provided a way for fire to spread from car to car and thus from level to level.
I'm absolutely not going to take you as an authority on recognising a battery fire from any other type of fire.
I also note you don't know how many cars were already alight when the brigade's fire fighting measures began.
Yes and we saw how quickly the fire brigade put it out when they arrived. Within five minutes.
You re missing the point the fire brigade were there within minutes. Within half an houu they had to withdraw as the whole place was a raging inferno.
Have a look at this video at about 6:57 to get some idea of the sheer intensity of a lithium battery fire, which only needs some kind of pressure or internal fault to set it off.
https://youtu.be/t1j9TUV5coc?si=yhoi6xkgLrOcNlGB
This might help inform you why firefighters ended up being hospitalised with smoke inhalation within minutes and the entire fire brigade needing to withdraw to tackle the raging inferno from outside the building.
[qimg]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53275430148_51cb8f53fd_c.jpg[/qimg]JLR by Username Vixen, on Flickr
At this stage, subject to verification, the Luton fire is consistent with a diesel hybrid fire, emanating from the lithium battery.
Do you think the Fire Brigade hasn't already thought of all of that?