LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 21,162
May I respectfully refer the thread to my post #48?
Arghhhh! I clicked that - it was a homeopathy forum where the top article was a homeopath spewingVixenesqueChatGPT levels of total bilge about potentisation. I got out quickly but my brain is contaminated.
DO NOT CLICK THAT LINK
May I respectfully refer the thread to my post #48?
May I respectfully refer the thread to my post #48?
Er, no. That's not what they do. It's clear from their website that they don't regurgitate press releases but that they independently fact check.
It's also clear to anyone with English as a first language from the words "confirmed to fact check" and the word "previously" (referring to the press release) that they did not use the press release.
Is that what you think happened? You think that the vehicle that caught fire just melted through the floor?
We all know what lying means. From relentless exposure to the practice, if nothing else.
Chlorine trifluoride....
![]()
A Lithium battery fire cannot melt Conctete, unless you add Thermite to it, it looks like the floor above collapsed do to a Carbon based fire causing the steel supports of the concrete to fail.
Simular to other well known collapses like the world trade center, Madrid Tower, plasco building in Iran.
Concrete does spauld though at below 1000c some some Spaulding degradation of concrete is known to occur in Hydrocarbon based fires.
I doubt ...
There wasn't any black smoke. Just a sudden orange and red flash from beneath the car. Within ten minutes the whole place was on fire.
Are you arguing a lack of black smoke is indicative of a concrete floor being burned through?
No, Vixen is spewing random bilge.
Are you arguing a lack of black smoke is indicative of a concrete floor being burned through?
JLR by Username Vixen, on FlickrWhat does this look like to you?
[qimg]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53275430148_51cb8f53fd_z.jpg[/qimg]JLR by Username Vixen, on Flickr
I doubt the Regional Fire Chief would give a self-defined unregulated small outfit an 'off the record' statement different from the one given Reuters, AP and the BBC.
But it gives them plausible deniability should it turn out to be a q lithium battery fire after all. They can just refer people back to the official press statement. (See? We said, 'at this stage'.)
Scene: Local Pub
Fire Chief Andrew Hopkinson (for it is he): Tell you what, between you and me...
GUY IN PUB: Go on, so what really happened?
Fire Chief: <sups pint> Well you see, the JRL derv was actually an HEV, I wasn't allowed to say that bit. Well, flippin' battery fell out didn't it causing a thermal runaway to the floor. Bloody ceiling gave way and whoosh whole place up in smoke!
GUY: I'll let Full Fact know asap that I got it confirmed straight from the horse's mouth!
Fire Chief: Don't let BBC or Reuters know, though.
The video of the incident shows the car is not in a parking space, so I'm going to venture it was driving and not parked....So this could only realistically happen whilst the engine is still running, as a parked derv is unlikely to combust of its own accord. The tail lights are on in the video so it is feasible it is a diesel fire caused by faulty electric wiring, right?
But it wouldn't get so hot as to do anything more that cause spalling to the concrete, and the fire brigade could put it out in ten minutes, right? There are no cars near it, so there is nothing to leap from it to a nearby EV as it has yet to park, albeit in a narrow space.
What do you think it looks like? And how does it stop the car where the fire started being a diesel?
Compare the flare to the one you see here:
Under test conditions, thermal runaway in cylindrical lithium ion battery cells causes an ignition fire.
What does this look like to you?