Mojo
Mostly harmless
If you thought DAILY MAIL was bad, it is possible to sink even lower.
Congratulations.
If you thought DAILY MAIL was bad, it is possible to sink even lower.
Spare me a click onto GBeebies website with a line about what it has to say. Do they reckon the fire was set by the woke?
Electric cars 'less likely' to catch fire than petrol or diesel vehicles amid Luton Airport blaze fears
...
Experts have highlighted how electric cars are more fire-safe than other types of vehicles just days after a devastating fire.
,.,.
Andrew Hopkinson, chief fire officer for Bedfordshire Fire and Rescue Service, said the blaze started after a diesel-powered Range Rover burst into flames.
GB News: well known for its accurate reporting. It is not a direct quote from Andrew Hopkinson of the Beds Fire Brigade, it is GB News paraphrasing him.
And yet, on a channel that is the most likely to be spreading anti-EV propaganda, it is confirmed that the car at the origin of the blaze was a diesel.
If the fire service officer had any real doubts about the car, he would have said so. The fact that he has implied there might be a small possibility that it is not a diesel is just natural caution in case something very unlikely has been overlooked.
GB News is being investigated by Ofcom on several different fronts (not least the recent salacious misogynistic exchange between Laurence Fox and Dan Wootton - one sacked, one suspended; and thinly disguised party political broadcasts dressed up as 'chat') an in imminent danger of losing its licence as a news broadcasting corporate. If this is revoked, they would only be able to do 'on-line news', not dissimilar to RT or other rogue news outlets). So of course GB News now have to be seen as behaving themselves. But they are still winding up their viewers (albeit six of them) by insisting Beds Fire Chief Andrew Hopkinson said it was a Land Rover diesel, when he didn't actually say that. So perhaps it is too subtle for some, but GB News are still stirring things up.
Posts on Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) have claimed that the Luton Airport multi-storey car park fire was started by an electric or hybrid vehicle.
But this is not the case. The local fire brigade, Bedfordshire Fire & Rescue Service, confirmed to Full Fact that the initial vehicle involved in the fire was a diesel, not a hybrid.
Andrew Hopkinson, chief fire officer at Bedfordshire Fire & Rescue Service, previously told the media: “We have no intelligence at this stage to suggest that this was anything other than an accidental fire that started in one of the vehicles that had not long arrived at the airport. It was not an EV. This was a diesel powered vehicle.”
GB News is being investigated by Ofcom on several different fronts (not least the recent salacious misogynistic exchange between Laurence Fox and Dan Wootton - one sacked, one suspended; and thinly disguised party political broadcasts dressed up as 'chat') an in imminent danger of losing its licence as a news broadcasting corporate. If this is revoked, they would only be able to do 'on-line news', not dissimilar to RT or other rogue news outlets). So of course GB News now have to be seen as behaving themselves. But they are still winding up their viewers (albeit six of them) by insisting Beds Fire Chief Andrew Hopkinson said it was a Land Rover diesel, when he didn't actually say that. So perhaps it is too subtle for some, but GB News are still stirring things up.
https://fullfact.org/online/electric-hybrid-did-not-start-luton-airport-car-park-fire/
How much more definitive do you want it?
All of which has nothing to do with the post you quoted nor what was being discussed.
Yes, it does, because the poster was positing, 'Why would GB News, a news channel known to be vehemently anti-woke, quote the fire chief as saying it was a diesel Land Rover?'
I explained that this quote by them was not accurate and was just a paraphrase. I also explained why GB News is being careful not to spread more disinformation, given it is under intense scrutiny by Ofcom and in real danger of losing its licence as a news broadcasting channel.
But GB News is still being mischievous in misquoting Hopkinson because its viewers are utterly wound up about the type of fire they can see in the car park CCTV.
So GB News is still hardly a reliable source, woke or non-woke.
https://fullfact.org/online/electric-hybrid-did-not-start-luton-airport-car-park-fire/
How much more definitive do you want it?
He has chosen his words carefully.
FullFact said:The local fire brigade, Bedfordshire Fire & Rescue Service, confirmed to Full Fact that the initial vehicle involved in the fire was a diesel, not a hybrid.
Did he choose as carefully as Full Fact?
Did you not carefully read the header above that sentence?
Yes, it does, because the poster was positing, 'Why would GB News, a news channel known to be vehemently anti-woke, quote the fire chief as saying it was a diesel Land Rover?'
You're lying. Do you read your own posts? This is the bloody OP, for ****'s sake.But nobody was claiming it wasn't accidental or that it was 'an EV'. The consensus seems to be it was a hybrid battery fire from its appearance in the CCTV.
...
Whilst the police confirm the vehicle in question was a diesel car, there has been much speculation and arguing on social media that the car ‘must have been an EV or Hybrid’ as ‘only a lithium battery would explode like that’.
I blame the person with a "Cockney" accent who was born in a "Birmingham" post code, who was "psychic"...
You're lying. Do you read your own posts? This is the bloody OP, for ****'s sake.