• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: The sinking of MS Estonia: Case Reopened Part VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vixen said:
I have added the link which is as in the post.

I am not aware it is your Christopher Bollyn chap as you claim.
Click to expand...

I followed your (added) link and the text you quote doesn't appear to be in it. Key words like "Volvo" are, but no sentences. Happy to be corrected here.

The Bollyn article I linked to includes the very text you quoted, however.
 
Last edited:
Vixen said:
Doesn't have to be a truck every time, does it?

Someone has looked up the details of that Volvo and came up with the following:
"(The white Volvo owner with registration number KUH 914 model year 1992 which is discontinued.) The first owner owned on December 27, 1996 and the second change of ownership was a company in Solna - (2011-7-20) third was a private person from Tibro (2011-08 -02)"

The customs slip showed the car belonging to a non-existent company called Ericsson Access AB, a fictitious subsidiary of AB LM Ericsson Finance. No address was given. Henriksson discovered later that the vehicle was a rental car.
Click to expand...

https://citizens-lives-destroyed-swedish-authorities8.webnode.page/estonia-disaster/
Click to expand...


Only the second paragraph of your quotation appears at that link. Where did you get the rest?
 
Vixen said:
He is some kind of disinformation agent. No sign of him on Wikipedia. He is obviously a detractor. A set up.
Click to expand...

You can't be serious. Just because he's not on Wikipedia he's a disinfo agent? Please tell me you're joking because the alternative is too sad for words.

We know he's real by the way, and we know he isn't playing a character. He's just a scumbag.
 
Mojo said:
Only the second paragraph of your quotation appears at that link. Where did you get the rest?
Click to expand...

No idea but it appears to be factual as anyone can look up any car number around these parts and order a history of its registration and owner and even that owner's address. So if you want to check it out just enter the car reg details for Sweden. Nothing mysterious.
 
JayUtah said:
During the Cold War we had to resort to some underhanded means of obtaining materials we could only get from Soviet Bloc countries. Most notably, the titanium to build the SR-71 all came from the former Soviet Union. But the notion that it would be smuggled in tiny amounts on passenger liners is thoroughly ridiculous. As I noted, we (meaning mostly the CIA) set up shell companies and semi-legitimate supply chains that were just complicated and murky enough to keep the Soviets from guessing where the titanium was ultimately going. We needed these materials in engineering amounts, not something you can stuff under the seat of an army truck.
Click to expand...

Yes, the Blackbird titanium story is a classic.

And the Swedish admititted they smuggled/transported goodies from Russia on MS Estonia, and other vessels during that time. But the Swedish government is now on record that they had no vehicles on MS Estonia on the night of the sinking.

The problem is none of the technology listed was worth killed 800 people to protect.
 
JayUtah said:
Asked and answered. Regardless, that is obviously your source and you're trying to hide that fact.
Click to expand...

AFAIAA the source is the Custom's guy. He was interviewed for a radio station and that led to questions in the Riksdag/Senate and the appointment of High Court Appeal Judge, Jonathan Hirschfeld, being appointed to address the matter.

The source is hardly mysterious.


And no, 'Christopher Bollyn' does not own it.
 
Axxman300 said:
Yes, the Blackbird titanium story is a classic.

And the Swedish admititted they smuggled/transported goodies from Russia on MS Estonia, and other vessels during that time. But the Swedish government is now on record that they had no vehicles on MS Estonia on the night of the sinking. The problem is none of the technology listed was worth killed 800 people to protect.
Click to expand...


Citation please.
 
Vixen said:
You don't think Russia would commit 'mass murder'? It thought nothing of killing eight Swedish airmen in the 1950's whom they believed were spying. It could be said that those thousand or so passengers were being used as a human shield if it was hoped by the military that the smuggling could not be stopped by aggressive means. The idea that an enemy state doesn't mind spying and smuggling seems terribly naive.
Click to expand...

The Russians tend to be loud about killing people when they feel they're forced to do so.

A spy plane was fair game during the Cold War. This was not the Cold War.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom