Mojo
Mostly harmless
Bildt saying it was the bow visor was in all the papers the very same afternoon as the accident.
Sources and direct quotations, with context, please.
Bildt saying it was the bow visor was in all the papers the very same afternoon as the accident.
Instead of relying on your guesses, we can check what was actually reported.
The analysis group looked into this, and reports about it already in chapter 2.
TT is a press agency.
[qimg]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53172928635_4dc8d83e17_z.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53172694184_96194853b5_z.jpg[/qimg]
Where did you get these images from?
What measures did you take to verify their authenticity?
Sources and direct quotations, with context, please.
HSAgainst the gate theory of Sillaste, water could have come out of the ramps," Lehtola points out. Henrik Sillaste, the ship's Estonian engineer, said on Wednesday that the bow gate of the ferry was not completely closed and before the accident water flowed from the bow gate onto the car deck. Sillaste said he saw this on a surveillance camera monitor in engineering.
1:30 would be about half an hour after Stockholm got the Mayday.
Thanks for the biggest laugh of the day: Carl Bildt was...wait for it...informed by a press agency pager at 1:31, the same time as everybody else at the party! TT News knew about the accident before the Prime Minister. That would be like saying the US President was informed of the 9/11 attack by Reuters.
As a true Skeptic, I call BS on that one.
"First TT telegram that Estonia is feared to have sunk."
Well, what technology do you believe was used to notify Bildt and Svensson, and when?
More likely by an aide watching one of the morning news programs.
According to Here_to_Learn they were paged by a pager from TT News Agency.
Now why couldn't TT News page Stockholm Coastguard as soon as the the Mayday was heard at 1:21 EET.
Surely someone must have used the modern invention the telephone to let TT News know.
I can guarantee it will have been one of his intelligence (defence forces) guys.
This is a Finnish paper that normally has a print run before the early hours so 29.8.1994 was the first day it reported on the disaster:
HS
1:30 would be about half an hour after Stockholm got the Mayday.
Thanks for the biggest laugh of the day: Carl Bildt was...wait for it...informed by a press agency pager at 1:31, the same time as everybody else at the party! TT News knew about the accident before the Prime Minister. That would be like saying the US President was informed of the 9/11 attack by Reuters.
As a true Skeptic, I call BS on that one.
"First TT telegram that Estonia is feared to have sunk."
I can guarantee it will have been one of his intelligence (defence forces) guys.
Are you seriously suggesting the US President was watching it unfold on tv like the rest of us..?
I can guarantee it will have been one of his intelligence (defence forces) guys.
Are you seriously suggesting the US President was watching it unfold on tv like the rest of us..?
Sounds like someone's a bit miffed that the follow-on investigation hasn't found any more evidence of explosives than the previous one did. Maybe the one witness who claimed to have heard something that "sounded like an explosion" (you know, while the ship was falling apart) isn't slam-dunk evidence that there were explosives.
Why would a news agency page a coastguard station?
You can't tell there was an explosion just by looking at an underwater image.
The guy did actually say there was blackening at the hull but said it was 'probably bacteria'.
You do know these guys are discreet in how they impart information. They know not to say anything controversial. It's called 'managing expectations'.
No, he was reading a children's book in a classroom.
Seriously. That's how it happened.
Let me see if I understand.
If Bildt knew about the disaster early, then there's something suspicious going on. And if he learned about the disaster at the same time as everyone else, well, that's just ridiculous.
Is this about right?