Cont: The Biden Presidency (3)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now you're judging the importance of the lie? That is subjective.

No ****, Sherlock. Of course I'm judging the importance of lies. So do you. And of course that judgment is subjective. It cannot be otherwise. That's my entire point.

Even according to Forbes, a right wing publication if there ever was one, Biden has told far fewer significant lies than either Trump or Obama.

Once again, I'm not trying to compare him to anyone else. That's entirely on you.
 
No ****, Sherlock. Of course I'm judging the importance of lies. So do you. And of course that judgment is subjective. It cannot be otherwise. That's my entire point.

Once again, I'm not trying to compare him to anyone else. That's entirely on you.

Of course not. You're just bashing Biden for one lie and didn't bash Trump for the thousands he told, well, just because.
 
Of course not. You're just bashing Biden for one lie and didn't bash Trump for the thousands he told, well, just because.

This isn't a Trump thread, why would I be talking about his lies? And I never claimed Trump doesn't lie. He does, but that's off topic. As for Biden, I pointed to a specific lie (or more accurately, several lies told together on one occasion), but it's hardly the only lies he's ever told. And I'm not demanding you even care about Biden's lies. Feel free not to, if you like. He's hardly unique in being a politician who lies.

Just don't pretend that his mental faculties are still all there, when his decline is obvious.
 
Their alternatives right now are a purveyor of Republican conspiracy theories with a famous long-dead Democrat's last name and, worse yet, their real enemy: a progressive. :jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp Anything is better as far as they're concerned. Biden lets the others in the power class outside the Presidency keep their seats in the power class.
I'm not sure I agree to the same extent as you're describing it, but the immediate reaction to Biden speaking is "this guy is really old" and he definitely has lost a few steps compared to the plentiful footage of him speaking in his earlier career.

Republicans could probably score a lot of points on this if it weren't for the fact that their guy is also well over the hill.

I guess the advanced age and dodgy mental and physical health of both Trump and Biden adds quite a bit of wildcard potential to the coming race. isn't it great that the fate of our nation rests on two old geezers continuing to outperform teh actuarial tables?

As I recall, you both had no problems in 2020 with an 'old geezer' like Bernie Sanders,who is older than Biden and who suffered a heart attack while campaigning , being elected POTUS. But he's a progressive, so somehow that must be different.
 
This isn't a Trump thread, why would I be talking about his lies? And I never claimed Trump doesn't lie. He does, but that's off topic. As for Biden, I pointed to a specific lie (or more accurately, several lies told together on one occasion), but it's hardly the only lies he's ever told. And I'm not demanding you even care about Biden's lies. Feel free not to, if you like. He's hardly unique in being a politician who lies.

Just don't pretend that his mental faculties are still all there, when his decline is obvious.

The problem with your argument is it ignores that you never bashed Trump for his massive dishonesty in any thread. But now, with Biden, all of a sudden you developed principles.

Biden's mental faculties are still there. I don't pretend.
 
And don't forget Reagan, people still looooove Reagan even though we know now that at the time he was about as compos mentis as his jelly beans. The fact is, the guy at the top doesn't have to be completely there, so long as the people around him can a) keep him from doing or saying anything crazy in public, and b) are competent and capable of running things themselves in his name. Neither of those two things was true for Trump, he was surrounded by people just as crooked and stupid as he is, and nobody can keep Trump from shrieking his mad stupidity every four minutes. Reagan they could just chuck a cloth over him and he'd go right to sleep. Trump can't stop himself talking or texting or phoning or anything, even on the toilet.
 
Your memory is short.

Note also that I'm not trying to make any comparisons here, so there's really no point in trying to tu quoque this. Purely on his own terms, Biden lies on a regular basis. That's just the truth, but evidently the truth is triggering to some people.

Hmmm. "Lying on a regular basis" means having to go back 36 years ago to a 1987 campaign event to find Biden 'lying' about his academics.

Yes, yes...we know you weren't comparing Biden to Trump, but that old footage was released in May 2019 by Brad Parscale, Trump’s 2020 campaign manager. The irony and hypocrisy of the Trump campaign using an over 30 year old rant by Biden which included false statements is off the meter.
 
I believe it.

It's pretty clear to me that Hunter was running a "Rainmaker Scam" using his father's name. Tell people that he can get the ear of the Vice-President for some cash bribes, then pocket the cash without telling his dad. If things go the way the client wants, Hunter takes the credit. If they don't, Hunter makes excuses. Lather, rinse, repeat.

This is why the GOP can find all sorts of secondhand information that Joe Biden was taking bribes (because Hunter was saying he did), but they can't find any evidence of Joe Biden actually getting any bribe money (because Hunter left him out of the loop).

and the scam was against a crooked foreign energy company trying to bribe a politician, and he was just partying and buying guns. the whole thing just doesn't bother me that much honestly.
 
Dude, he's not mentally capable of it anymore. Hell, they barely let him out of the basement in 2020 when he was supposed to be campaigning full time. He hasn't gotten better. If the Democrats let him run in 2024, it's going to be a god damn train wreck of a campaign.

Your spin on the highlighted is fascinating. You obviously need to be reminded that the 2020 campaign was being run during the height of the Covid pandemic when people were dying by the thousands. While Biden was being responsible by NOT holding rallies...aka superspreading events... and campaigning by using televised events he videotaped in his basement, Trump was telling us all how it would be gone by Easter like 'a miracle', that the flu was deadlier, and that despite knowing just how deadly it was, he 'still likes playing it down'. While Biden was acting responsibly, Trump was holding unmasked events like the Oct. Rose Garden event celebrating Amy Coney Barrett's SC nomination.... all the while knowing Covid was airborne. At least eight attendees tested positive for Covid within a week.

For someone who told acbytesla that he has a 'short memory', not only do you have short memory, but a distorted one as well.
 
But how you evaluate lies absolutely is. How big a lie something is, how important it is, absolutely does come down to subjective evaluation. Are two minor lies more dishonest than one major lie? Hell, what even counts as a minor lie vs a major lie? There's no objective scale for this. You can pretend there is, but you're only kidding yourself.

'I wasn't involved in Hunter's business dealings.'
Do you still believe that one? Is it a minor lie? A major lie? Does it only count as one lie, or does each instance count?

Yes, I do believe it because neither you nor the GOP have provided proof that Pres. Biden was involved in any illegal activities by Hunter. All that's been produced during the last five year effort by the right wing are accusations. It's been no different than the repeated accusations that the election was rigged: all bluster and no proof. But it just goes to show that some people will believe a lie, regardless of the lack of evidence, if it's what they want/need to believe.
 
Yes, I do believe it because neither you nor the GOP have provided proof that Pres. Biden was involved in any illegal activities by Hunter. All that's been produced during the last five year effort by the right wing are accusations. It's been no different than the repeated accusations that the election was rigged: all bluster and no proof. But it just goes to show that some people will believe a lie, regardless of the lack of evidence, if it's what they want/need to believe.

One of my neighbors is generally a nice lady but she still thinks Trump won and that Hunter is guilty. Never mind she can't even say what Hunter is guilty of. Never mind all the court failures or the billion dollar defamation case that Dominion Voting Systems won over Fox News.

Evidence? We don’t need no stinking evidence.
 
My memory is long enough to recall there was sooper seecrit proof that Obama was a thin-skinned narcissist, but we never saw it. The blinders are on.

Ah, but they never said Trump wasn't a narcissist.

The topic is Obama...or Biden. So the focus is on them.

:)
 
One of my neighbors is generally a nice lady but she still thinks Trump won and that Hunter is guilty. Never mind she can't even say what Hunter is guilty of. Never mind all the court failures or the billion dollar defamation case that Dominion Voting Systems won over Fox News.

Evidence? We don’t need no stinking evidence.

My moron BIL sent my sister a Tucker Carslon TweetX video interviewing Sund, the Chief of the Capitol Police on Jan 6. I was able to disprove all 3 of TC's idiot claims made during just the first minute, including that Pelosi kept the National Guard from being deployed for 71 minutes. I used Snopes to provide quotes that Pelosi had no control of the NG and that Sund's request to the Pentagon for the NG was initially stalled by the Pentagon for over 3 hours. His response:

"It is well known Snopes is a partisan left leaning so called 'fact checking' source that is usually dishonest in its details."

You cannot reason with morons.
 
My moron BIL sent my sister a Tucker Carslon TweetX video interviewing Sund, the Chief of the Capitol Police on Jan 6. I was able to disprove all 3 of TC's idiot claims made during just the first minute, including that Pelosi kept the National Guard from being deployed for 71 minutes. I used Snopes to provide quotes that Pelosi had no control of the NG and that Sund's request to the Pentagon for the NG was initially stalled by the Pentagon for over 3 hours. His response:

"It is well known Snopes is a partisan left leaning so called 'fact checking' source that is usually dishonest in its details."

You cannot reason with morons.

I'm pretty sure Snopes lists its sources. But even if your BIL checked that source he would find an excuse.
 
Snopes and all other fact-checking sites are proven to be Commie Leftist Fake-News Socialist Liberal Liars, which is proven by the first time they ever questioned anything Trump said. Even if he contradicted it two minutes later.
 
I'm pretty sure Snopes lists its sources. But even if your BIL checked that source he would find an excuse.

My reply to him was "Any excuse in a storm" and he replied, 'I could say the same about you." Which is silly because I VERY, VERY RARELY mention politics around him in order not to put my sister in the middle between her husband and me. He's just an idiot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom