Christianity is a grotesque blight!

Leumas said:
I prefer... Christianity is a grotesque blight.
Click to expand...
Are you sure that's enough words to communicate your intent? I mean, what if "grotesque blight" is misconstrued in some way, and a reader fails to infer the proper level of seething vitriol your title is intend to convey? "A lot" might cut it for the PFJ as far as hating the Romans goes, but we're talking about Jesus, the pathetic, zombified, ill-begotten son of a celestial slave-monger and his deadbeat sky daddy, the lover of Sumerian pimps and ethnic cleansing.


Christianity: Jesus the lascivious voyeur enjoying his lecherous priests' villainy in their rectories.
Click to expand...
That's more like it. After all, you want your readers to ascertain how much more you hate Christianity than they do.
 
Last edited:
Foster Zygote said:
Are you sure that's enough words to communicate your intent? I mean, what if "grotesque blight" is misconstrued in some way, and a reader fails to infer the proper level of seething vitriol your title is intend to convey? "A lot" might cut it for the PFJ as far as hating the Romans goes, but we're talking about Jesus, the pathetic, Zombified, ill-begotten son of a celestial slave-monger and his deadbeat sky daddy, the lover of Sumerian pimps and ethnic cleansing.



That's more like it. After all, you want your readers to ascertain how much more you hate Christianity than they do.
Click to expand...

Reported.
 
Leumas said:
I prefer... Christianity is a grotesque blight.
Click to expand...

Leumas said:
Or much more correctly apt...
Christianity: Jesus the lascivious voyeur enjoying his lecherous priests' villainy in their rectories.​
Click to expand...

Nah, stick with the blight.

Blaming Jesus for the sins of christianity, when it's actually that **** Saulus' fault, is a bit unfair.

Foster Zygote said:
That's more like it. After all, you want your readers to ascertain how much more you hate Christianity than they do.
Click to expand...

Can we have a "Who's got the biggest hate?" competition?*

I have a range of letters published in newspapers under my name, with an added title of "Extreme Atheist", a blog with deliberate and disgusting blasphemy of all that christians hold dear - Mary and Jesus, particularly - and I have done chalk drawings outside churches of the lovely child-friendly stories like Noah and Sodom; replete with dozens of dead babies.**

I also universally use the online name of The Atheist. Not just any atheist, the one and only.

*While a double negative creates a positive, a double question mark does not make a statement.

**No actual babies were killed for the display. (that I'm aware of)
 
The Atheist said:
Nah, stick with the blight.

Blaming Jesus for the sins of christianity, when it's actually that **** Saulus' fault, is a bit unfair.



Can we have a "Who's got the biggest hate?" competition?*

I have a range of letters published in newspapers under my name, with an added title of "Extreme Atheist", a blog with deliberate and disgusting blasphemy of all that christians hold dear - Mary and Jesus, particularly - and I have done chalk drawings outside churches of the lovely child-friendly stories like Noah and Sodom; replete with dozens of dead babies.**

I also universally use the online name of The Atheist. Not just any atheist, the one and only.

*While a double negative creates a positive, a double question mark does not make a statement.

**No actual babies were killed for the display. (that I'm aware of)
Click to expand...

If you want to go explicit on the 'dead children' aspect I'd lean heavily on the Slaughter of the Innocents, the Holy Family get advanced warning and slope off to Egypt and don't even warn the poor scmucks they leave behind to be put to the sword in Jeebus's place.
 
P.J. Denyer said:
If you want to go explicit on the 'dead children' aspect I'd lean heavily on the Slaughter of the Innocents, the Holy Family get advanced warning and slope off to Egypt and don't even warn the poor scmucks they leave behind to be put to the sword in Jeebus's place.
Click to expand...

There's so much to choose from.

23 Then he went up from there to Bethel; and as he was going up by the way, young lads came out from the city and mocked him and said to him, “Go up, you baldhead; go up, you baldhead!” 24 When he looked behind him and saw them, he cursed them in the name of the LORD. Then two female bears came out of the woods and tore up forty-two lads of their number. 25 And he went from there to Mount Carmel, and from there he returned to Samaria.
Click to expand...

Or the basic premise of the Book of Job (God makes it alright for Job by giving him a replacement wife and kids for the ones he let aThe Adversary kill)
 
About two months ago, I started a kitchen remodel that had decent (if lower end) appliances that the new owner wanted to replace with snazzy stainless steel jazz. The new appliance deliverers offered to take the old ones to the recycling center for free (but they get money for them). I threw out a call to the grotesquely blighted nun that runs a local charity network. As it happened, word was already out that an elderly retired couple really needed some appliances but were a bit on the broke side. They were not grotesquely blighted parishioners, just long term residents of the neighborhood. I delivered them to their home, where a couple grotesquely blighted church volunteers were waiting to offload and install them. The grotesquely blighted nun was not there, because she was hustling to coordinate another charitable work in the name of her grotesquely blighted faith.
 
Thermal said:
About two months ago, I started a kitchen remodel that had decent (if lower end) appliances that the new owner wanted to replace with snazzy stainless steel jazz. The new appliance deliverers offered to take the old ones to the recycling center for free (but they get money for them). I threw out a call to the grotesquely blighted nun that runs a local charity network. As it happened, word was already out that an elderly retired couple really needed some appliances but were a bit on the broke side. They were not grotesquely blighted parishioners, just long term residents of the neighborhood. I delivered them to their home, where a couple grotesquely blighted church volunteers were waiting to offload and install them. The grotesquely blighted nun was not there, because she was hustling to coordinate another charitable work in the name of her grotesquely blighted faith.
Click to expand...

Leumas will no doubt be along shortly to tell us how much he hates these people, and you particularly for initiating this whole sordid escapade.
 
Thermal said:
About two months ago, I started a kitchen remodel that had decent (if lower end) appliances that the new owner wanted to replace with snazzy stainless steel jazz. The new appliance deliverers offered to take the old ones to the recycling center for free (but they get money for them). I threw out a call to the grotesquely blighted nun that runs a local charity network. As it happened, word was already out that an elderly retired couple really needed some appliances but were a bit on the broke side. They were not grotesquely blighted parishioners, just long term residents of the neighborhood. I delivered them to their home, where a couple grotesquely blighted church volunteers were waiting to offload and install them. The grotesquely blighted nun was not there, because she was hustling to coordinate another charitable work in the name of her grotesquely blighted faith.
Click to expand...

Typical schizophrenics.
 
Thermal said:
About two months ago, I started a kitchen remodel that had decent (if lower end) appliances that the new owner wanted to replace with snazzy stainless steel jazz. The new appliance deliverers offered to take the old ones to the recycling center for free (but they get money for them). I threw out a call to the grotesquely blighted nun that runs a local charity network. As it happened, word was already out that an elderly retired couple really needed some appliances but were a bit on the broke side. They were not grotesquely blighted parishioners, just long term residents of the neighborhood. I delivered them to their home, where a couple grotesquely blighted church volunteers were waiting to offload and install them. The grotesquely blighted nun was not there, because she was hustling to coordinate another charitable work in the name of her grotesquely blighted faith.
Click to expand...

Thank you, Thermal, for answering my question about the Blighters.
Love ye the Blighters.
 
Craig4 said:
Leumas said:
Or much more correctly apt...
Christianity: Jesus the lascivious voyeur enjoying his lecherous priests' villainy in their rectories.​
Click to expand...


Hyperbole much?
Click to expand...


Do you know what that word means?

Is it hyperbole to state what is believed by Christians?


Craig4 said:
What does all this vitriol get you?
Click to expand...


Neither is it "vitriol" to state what Christans believe is it?


Craig4 said:
What are you accomplishing here?
Click to expand...


Stating facts about Christianity.


Craig4 said:
Does it occur to you that the historical Jesus might be rather different from the Jesus character in the various versions of the bible?
Click to expand...


Aha... so you are admitting that the buybull is a lie... ah well... I agree.

Nevertheless.... if this "Jesus" of yours is not the character in the New Tall tales narrative then how in the realm of reality and logic and rationality do you get to know what or who this new character you want to assume is a "Jesus", was?
 
Last edited:
Leumas said:
Aha... so you are admitting that the buybull is a lie... ah well... I agree.

Nevertheless.... if this "Jesus" of yours is not the character in the New Tall tales narrative then how in the realm of reality and logic and rationality do you get to know what or who this new character you want to assume is a "Jesus", was?
Click to expand...

Evidence that Craig4 has a Jesus?

(I know, I know.... why do I bother? Well I do like to have a little fun with the forum now and then.)
 
Lukraak_Sisser said:
But imo Leumas' style of attacking anyone and anything affiliated with religion does more harm than good.
Click to expand...


But you do not think that religion and religionists are already doing tremendous harm by actually doing tremendous harm not just talking?

You think WORDS against the harm doers do harm... but actual harmful ACTIONS are ok?


Lukraak_Sisser said:
Reading such posts even I feel compelled to defend christians.
Click to expand...


How about reading REALITY and news papers... do you feel compelled to defend humanity and democracy and REAITY against the harmful ACTIONS and doings and machinations and venality of the religionists and religions DOING actual harm not just talking?


Lukraak_Sisser said:
'In the waiting room was a sign saying: To use a Terry Pratchett quote.

For your comfort and convenience YOU WILL NOT SMOKE!!. He'd never smoked in his life, but the sign made him want to try.'
Click to expand...


Yes... that is called cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.... do you think it is rational or SANE to do such things?
 
Last edited:
Apathia said:
Thank you, Thermal, for answering my question about the Blighters.
Love ye the Blighters.
Click to expand...


Do you know the difference between a blighter and a blighted?

Christianity and it hawkers (e.g. popes and bishops and priest etc.) are the blight and blighters... Christians are the blighted.

And blights do not affect all... the plague had many victims but many did not get blighted.

Just because some do not get blighted by the blight does not mean the blight and its disseminators (the blighters) are not a blight.

And the blighted are to be pitied... the blighters and blight are to be execrated not loved.
 
Steve said:
Leumas will no doubt be along shortly to tell us how much he hates these people, and you particularly for initiating this whole sordid escapade.
Click to expand...


Hey Steve... have you read the very first post in this newly fabricated thread.

It used to be the OP of a thread that is now ruined... the ruined thread was called
If Only Jesus Were Like This Grand Fellow!!​

The fellow I was referring to is an Anglican Reverend.

I suggest you go read that post and others following it.

You might notice the vitriol against the Grand Fellow was not from me but rather from many others.
 
Leumas said:
Do you know what that word means?

Is it hyperbole to state what is believed by Christians?





Neither is it "vitriol" to state what Christans believe is it?





Stating facts about Christianity.





Aha... so you are admitting that the buybull is a lie... ah well... I agree.

Nevertheless.... if this "Jesus" of yours is not the character in the New Tall tales narrative then how in the realm of reality and logic and rationality do you get to know what or who this new character you want to assume is a "Jesus", was?
Click to expand...

Reading in much?

What do you mean I admit? I've never claimed otherwise. If it makes you feel better to take a victory lap though, feel free. I don't value your approval and your derision costs me nothing.

You hyperbolic value judgements about a fictional character are hardly facts.

In what way is the below an objective fact?

Jesus the lascivious voyeur enjoying his lecherous priests' villainy in their rectories.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom