Pretty much everything she says is LGBTQ rhetoric. The gay bashing hate comes as a result of what she does - she attacks the collective group (as in the LGBTQ community), and gays are the L & G in LGBTQ part of the group, so by default she is attacking them too.
But the biggest issue for me is the result of the LGBTQ hate she stirs up among the far right Nazis who support her (which is of course, the actual point. It is the reason why she does what she does).
https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/04/08/posie-parker-kellie-jay-keen-minshull-anti-trans-online-hate/
"Research collected by independent NZ body The Disinformation Project found that transphobic rhetoric reached “genocidal” levels following the tour by British anti-trans activist Posie Parker, whose real name is Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull."
In Melbourne, Keen-Minshull and ‘gender-critical’ activists were joined by neo-Nazis, leading to condemnation from Victoria premier Dan Andrews.
Following the chaotic event, Disinformation Project researcher Dr Sanjana Hattotuwa told RNZ that the subsequent spike in online hatred directed at trans people was unlike anything he had ever seen.
“They are being hounded, harassed, harmed and hated upon online – to a degree we’ve never studied before,” he said.
“Something that we’ve never seen before is the import of content from Australian neo-Nazi, neo-fascist, antisemitic networks and their personal networks, into New Zealand.”
In the weeks following the ‘Let Women Speak’ tour, researchers found that the anti-trans content being shared had become “extraordinarily violent”.
Hattotuwa added that there is an “extremely strong correlation” between hate speech and real-life violence against marginalised groups like the trans community.
As I have previously made clear, I agree with much of her position (e.g. the parts as regards transwomen being allowed in women's safe spaces and women's sports) but I am 100% opposed to the way she goes about it.
First off, Pink News has an incredibly biased view on anything that touches on Transgender issues. Based on how Pink has reported things over the past couple of years, you yourself would be classed as an extremist nazi who is trying to genocide all transgender people worldwide. So you might want to consider that their representation of things might be a bit exaggerated.
Secondly... The link in Pink's article to The Disinformation Project, that Pink claims shows this skyrocketing vilification doesn't support Pink's claim. It's a research paper published in Nov 2022, sutdying misogyny.
https://thedisinfoproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Dangerous-speech-misogyny-and-democracy.pdf
Third, the quotes attributed to Dr. Sanjana Hattotuwa are sourced from
RNZ News. All of the quotes that RNZ reports are snippets attributed to Dr. Hattotuwa, none of the quotes actually specify transgender individuals as the target. RNZ includes a lot of views attributed to Dr. Hattotuwa which lack quotes.
For consideration, Pink News says this:
Hattotuwa added that there is an “extremely strong correlation” between hate speech and real-life violence against marginalised groups like the trans community.
Whereas RNZ says this:
Hattotuwa said there was an "extremely strong correlation" between online hate and the possibility of physical violence.
RNZ's article contains no direct attribution of violence toward transgender people.
Furthermore, The Disinformation Project's site does not contain any new research of the sort claimed by Pink. Pink says:
Research collected by independent NZ body The Disinformation Project found that transphobic rhetoric reached “genocidal” levels following the tour by British anti-trans activist Posie Parker, whose real name is Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull.
But no such new research appears to be in evidence. I suppose it's marginally possible that The Disinformation Project has a bunch of new research that supports this, and that they have chosen ONLY to release their information to Pink, but it seems unlikely.
Thirdly, Pink frames this as if the ONLY vitriol is that which is aimed at transgender people. And I am certain there is plenty of it - there are some truly hateful people out there. The problem with reporting like Pink's is that it is entirely one-sided. And it either completely ignores, or it handwaves away, or it makes excuses for the hatred, harassment, and violence coming FROM the transgender activist side of this conflict.
If you don't believe that such exists, I can provide you with a large collection of screenshots of the inciteful and hateful things said to females by transgender people.
Beyond that, there's the fact that there are dozens of transgender rights meetings and rallies and days of remembrance and visibility etc. There is not one single instance of a transgender rights meeting being disrupted by females who are shouting down the speakers, threatening attendees, or even hassling them. There has not yet been an organized group of females coming together with the intent of making speakers for transgender rights feel unwelcome. On the other hand, however, nearly every instance of females getting together to discussion OUR rights is attended by hordes of transgender activists who heckle, yell, harass, intimidate, and even physically attack female attendees.
FFS, a meeting arranged to talk about the plight of females in Iran and Afghanistan had to be shut down... because apparently talking about the abuses that those middle eastern females face as a result of them being female is considered "hateful" because it is focused on females and doesn't include transgender identified females.
