d4m10n
Penultimate Amazing
Nevermind I've got it now, thx Elaedith.
Last edited:
Hey, what am I, chopped liver? (See the post two before yours.)
Here is the companion piece, an interview with the author of the book under discussion.
How the Tavistock gender clinic ran out of control
I can't see how this whole bubble won't burst within a few years, becoming a historical scandal within practicing medicine.
It has all the necessary ingredients.
It always takes longer than you think. But yes. I think the people pushing this have over-reached themselves and with any luck they might suffer a significant backlash.
I posted this thread earlier but it's pages back now. It's re-imagining what's going on, but with body integrity disorder instead of this gender thing. It immediately highlights the enormity of what's going on, by removing it from the "wrong-sexed soul" claptrap.
https://twitter.com/_CryMiaRiver/status/1624443564884123652
Care to quote an actual medical expert drawing this same distinction?If the actual medical experts ever decide they've got it wrong about transgender identity being a valid condition (as opposed to it being a mental health disorder), I'm sure they'll be good enough to let the non-experts know.
I think it is fair to say we should not generalize from news stories when crime statistics are readily available.
Do you support recording birth sex in the crime stats data?
Do you support answering questions with questions?Do you support recording sexuality of the offender in the crime stats data?
Care to quote an actual medical expert drawing this same distinction? Last I checked, gender dysphoria is a diagnosable condition.
Do you support answering questions with questions?
If the questions are reductive and ignorant, then why not?
I think it is fair to say we should not generalize from news stories when crime statistics are readily available.
Do you support recording birth sex in the crime stats data?
Lol. You think asking whether we should record birth sex in crime statistics is 'reductive and ignorant', when sex recorded at birth is the single most important variable relevant to criminal behaviour (as opposed to 'gender identity' which appears to have no relevance).
Nobody has ever given a satisfactory answer as to why the recording of the sex of an offender (something readily observed and verified and immutable) was suddenly and without apparent discussion changed to "gender" (a feeling in someone's head, which many people claim not to have, which is impossible to verify and is acknowledged to be "fluid" in many people). All suggestions gratefully received.
Only if there are important reasons to do so.Do you think the sexuality of offenders should be recorded?
Do you think the education standard of offenders should be recorded?
Do you think whether an offender came from a broken home should be recorded?
Jurisprudence not your strong suit, huh?
No, is think the former is well-defined in the DSM and the latter is not.Seriously? You still think that "gender dysphoria" is synonymous with "transgender identity"?
Care to quote an actual medical expert drawing this same distinction?
Last I checked, gender dysphoria remains a diagnosable condition, and we've yet to see any comments from the relevant experts on what it means to have a transgender identity apart from this condition. This makes sense, because why would medical experts comment on something which requires no medical attention?