d4m10n
Penultimate Amazing
I see what you're getting at here, but I think it's a matter of what concessions one is willing to make. Hair color is real and measurable, but the people who do believe in race cannot even agree on how many races exist much less how to measure it scientifically, much as flat-earthers cannot agree on a consensus model of the world. People who worked to segregate by race drew ridiculous dividing lines such that someone like Homer Plessy (⅞ European American by ancestry) counted as a person "of the colored race" for purposes of racial segregation back when they wrote the laws keeping schools, theatres, and railway carriages separate. We cannot even get to the question of whether race is a trivial difference (like hair or eye color) if we cannot sensibly define and measure race.I don't think this is the most important distinction. Natural hair color is biologically definable. It's got specific associated genes which, absent certain conditions (such as age making it grey) will determine what hair color grows from your follicles. But we don't segregate by hair color, because the difference is a trivial difference.
For the same reason we keep two sets of record books in weightlifting, one for men and another for women.We need to establish why we need sex segregation first.
How many female weightlifters would have gotten the chance to compete without sex segregation in the sport? I've linked the record books above, if that helps.Male advantage has been the norm in society so I should be interested in where you got the idea that female segregation is for female advancement.
So...you asked "Why the need for cruelly excluding Jenny?" without pausing to consider the type of people we're actually hoping to keep out.BTW so what if Merager is a sexual criminal.
Last edited: