We get this 'analogy' periodically. Deja vu.
As pointed out before, if it's ok for white males to sit next to girls on the bus but not black males, then the issue is clearly race, hence racism. This would be analogous if people thought it was ok for males who identify as men to change in the same rooms as females, but not for males who identify as women. This would then clearly be transphobia. However, nobody has ever argued this. Instead, when it is argued that both males who identify as men/boys and males who identify as woman/girls should not change in female changing rooms, the issue is clearly not being 'trans' but being male. Therefore it is actually analogous to having women-only sections on buses, then arguing that black males only should be allowed to sit in them, then pretending that objections to this are due to race rather than sex.
Of course, some people believe that sex should be replaced by self identified gender identity (similar to having woman-only sections on buses, but where 'woman' is redefined as being unrelated to being female), meaning that women would lose the right to object or react negatively to any male in a women's space. However, nobody ever seems to be able to argue for this from first principles, instead relying on personal attacks and spurious analogies.
