• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Alien Visitation Contact Proof

Ah. I see what you're talking about now. In that frame where the lights are just starting to go out, there's a blue-ish glow on the leaves. You can also see it over on the right in the tree just above the roofline of the house opposite, to the left of the large silhouetted tree trunk.

Hard to see it elsewhere, as so much of the scene is bright and going dark. I wonder if that's the flash of a bat having a bad evening.
 
It's this, basically. All there is to it. Except for the time stamp glitches, which as have been clearly shown are also prevalent in videos from the same system taken at other times.

I note that besides being unaware of (and unwilling to acknowledge) the designed behavior of reclosers, there's also been a consistent pattern of errors and misconceptions related to scale on cjdelphi's part that are likely caused by misapplying the principles of electronics and digital logic to grid-scale power systems.* Sure, the underlying laws of physics are the same for both, but the difference in scale means the engineering and the observed behaviors are different. Reasonable approximate understanding of behavior at one scale (e.g. that signals move through wires at close to the speed of light at the scale of integrated circuits or ordinary PC boards) becomes utterly wrong at the larger scale (e.g. expecting a section of the power grid to energize at the speed of light when a switch closes). If a step-down transformer takes even just one full AC cycle for both coils to fully energize, for example, that's a 20 millisecond delay. (More likely, it requires many cycles.) An eternity, for digital logic, but pretty much the minimal "Planck time" in the world of 50Hz AC power.

*This is reminiscent of the 9/11 truthers trying to use the behavior of small scale models like stacks of office trays or pizza boxes to "prove" the Twin Towers shouldn't have collapsed on 9/11.

If you claim the power came on then you can also show all the boys and girls at what moment in the video... right?
 
That's the light of the rightmost lamp. Your crappy camera has trouble adjusting to the changing light conditions.

Right most lamp?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YXgsafoSQWsqlDNh3sjbbbqCG-iaj5-n/view?usp=drivesdk

You talking about one I circled? ... they're all a couple of meters off the ground there is no light source high enough to do that here

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XCv-_4ZoxpfkEqX7UBIxDG53EJi4W-HP/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y7CVJPhCHjkQ06RZFRsKguxjo2pQ532W/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YblAoLjwUgQjrd6TzqCM0Zf-aat2XOM1/view?usp=drivesdk

You see all the light sources even the tallest light posts are not as tall despite being no where near, my crappy camera has no problem with the light levels that's why you see it lol
 
Last edited:
Ah. I see what you're talking about now. In that frame where the lights are just starting to go out, there's a blue-ish glow on the leaves. You can also see it over on the right in the tree just above the roofline of the house opposite, to the left of the large silhouetted tree trunk.

Hard to see it elsewhere, as so much of the scene is bright and going dark. I wonder if that's the flash of a bat having a bad evening.


You were arguing with me all this time over something you couldn't even see properly?

I hope that is not a common trend here, and the sound? ... not electrical!
 
This is the glow I see. In the first frame as the lights start to go out there are two patches which momentarily look brighter. It's quite easy to see the change if you pause the very slowed down video at that frame and then click back to an earlier one.


So far as I can see only those two patches of leaves get illuminated by that blueish flash. One might speculate it's a bat getting fried but we don't know where that happened or the lines of sight from that spot to those trees.
 
The thing that keeps occurring to me is why is it always engineers?

Well, there was a reason I asked that question about what engineers get taught earlier ;)

I seem to recall this one being discussed at length a while ago on the old Bad Science...

One of my favourites is still that YEC civil engineer blethering about how sediments form, which bears absolutely no relationship to any known geology.

#Notallengineers
 
Here's a jumprope song.

Aliunz here
Alliunz there
Alliunz crawlin
In yer hair.

Showed em to Teacher
Teacher said
Tell yer mama
Ta wash yer HEAD!

Burma Shave.
 
Fear, no attempt to explain or offer explanation of anything I bring up, avoid it and hope it goes away

Next time you see a flash but theres no reason for it like everyone else who has seen it you will then question if it was alien or your sanity, I'm here to tell you, it wouldn't be your sanity

Now I've told you what they are up to, I suggest you be quiet until you prove it's electrical or offer up a suggestion or theory that fits if you want me to play your silly little games

Have considered studying the scientific method?

I don't need to provide an explanation. I'm not making a claim.
 
I gave you the video, what's that? You avoid evidence and wait to ridicule them for something completely unrelated

I'm ridiculing you because you can't produce evidence of aliens. Your shortcomings as an electrician hardly prove you were visited by or abducted by aliens.
 
Here's a jumprope song.

Aliunz here
Alliunz there
Alliunz crawlin
In yer hair.

Showed em to Teacher
Teacher said
Tell yer mama
Ta wash yer HEAD!

Burma Shave.

I'm gonna wash those Grays right outta my hair!
I'm gonna was those Grays right outta of my hair!
Neutrogena T/Gel!
 
There *IS* alien life out there, some of it intelligent, with millions of years of technological advancement.

So then, why do we get such stupid aliens playing such stupid games?
 

Back
Top Bottom