• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Alien Visitation Contact Proof

cjdelphi said:
No, a real scientist will investigate it like I have, a real scientist backs up his or her claims by linking to evidence, I'm a programmer and amateur scientist
Click to expand...
A real scientist would probably not even bother to give you the time of day. They've got work to do and are generally disinclined to investigate random people on the internet with the vaguest of videos.
 
Pixel42 said:
Because it's the only way to determine if what your video shows is entirely explained by what you would discover.
Click to expand...

Ok, let me explain this to you simply, plasma discharge releases light and sound, light glows

https://youtu.be/rHVh0KwG_0k

any, yes, ANY light, does NOT and I repeat does NOT light up just a path 200 meters away

It lights up anything around it..

What you are claiming is the supernatural not science
 
arthwollipot said:
A real scientist would probably not even bother to give you the time of day. They've got work to do and are generally disinclined to investigate random people on the internet with the vaguest of videos.
Click to expand...

Idiots investigating it won't be paid...

The ones that are paid are the ones I want investigating this video...
 
cjdelphi said:
No, a real scientist will investigate it like I have
Click to expand...
I disagree. You clearly do not have the necessary skills.

a real scientist backs up his or her claims by linking to objective evidence
Click to expand...

FTFY

More specifically: a scientist observes the objective evidence, forms an hypothesis to explain it, and then tests that hypothesis.

For UFOs there is no objective evidence, just subjective interpretations of inherently unreliable records of unrepeatable events.

As the basis for an hypothesis that alien craft are visiting our planet, that evidence is wholly inadequate.

Moreover if the hypothesis is correct, it would be reasonable to expect that actual evidence - real, objective evidence - would eventually be found. That is the only real test that can be imagined for it. Every day that goes by without such evidence being produced, the plausibility of the hypothesis reduces even further.
 
arthwollipot said:
How many of them have you contacted?

How many responded?
Click to expand...

I was hoping nick Pope would investigate, he told me to contact mufon

Ben hansen or Hanson, he said yes to aliens but unsure about abduction


Mary rodwell says yes, alien

I've contacted two others but they never got back to me, and I really really wouldn't waste my time if I thought this was a mere brown out..

Plasma discharge makes a distinct noise never heard
Brown outs would light up the street, it doesn't

Anything like that would light up the street and tree not the floor and it would not make that sound and electricity crews would have to come out and replace the damaged transformer

They had it up the moment they arrived

Put simply

A brown out and electrical discharge can't cause what you see in the video
 
Pixel42 said:
I disagree. You clearly do not have the necessary skills.



FTFY

More specifically: a scientist observes the objective evidence, forms an hypothesis to explain it, and then tests that hypothesis.

For UFOs there is no objective evidence, just subjective interpretations of inherently unreliable records of unrepeatable events.

As the basis for an hypothesis that alien craft are visiting our planet, that evidence is wholly inadequate.

Moreover if the hypothesis is correct, it would be reasonable to expect that actual evidence - real, objective evidence - would eventually be found. That is the only real test that can be imagined for it. Every day that goes by without such evidence being produced, the plausibility of the hypothesis reduces even further.
Click to expand...

This is only true if your theory of them not visiting us is true

You're wrong they are here
 
Furthermore, "scientist" doesn't describe just one field of inquiry. There are many different fields of science - biology, chemistry, physics, etc, and many subcategories thereof. I don't know what field a light in someone's front yard would fall into.
 
cjdelphi said:
I was hoping nick Pope would investigate, he told me to contact mufon
Click to expand...
Nick Pope is a journalist, not a scientist.

cjdelphi said:
Ben hansen or Hanson, he said yes to aliens but unsure about abduction
Click to expand...
Ben Hansen is a chiropractor, so very much not a scientist.

cjdelphi said:
Mary rodwell says yes, alien
Click to expand...
Mary Rodwell is a nurse, and has an active financial interest in promoting the idea of alien contact through her website alienlady.com and the books, CDs, and hypnotic regression therapy she sells. Not a scientist.
 
arthwollipot said:
Furthermore, "scientist" doesn't describe just one field of inquiry. There are many different fields of science - biology, chemistry, physics, etc, and many subcategories thereof. I don't know what field a light in someone's front yard would fall into.
Click to expand...

It would fall into the unexplained

Just like the Phoenix lights

Maybe the governer of Adelaide like the governer of Arizona comes forward and says yes he too witnessed the event

Fact is only my webcam captured this and if not for that video I wouldn't be here now

Ok just pretend you're not a skeptic just pretend for one moment I am correct and alien abduction takes place and they are hiding this fact

Let's assume I'm right

It implies we are being violated and abducted, not just crackpot who claim they have , this video implies that now just imagine for 1 moment In time I am absolutely right...

How do you feel knowing aliens are abducting random people and all they see is a strange flash of light...

I'm not making money from this, I can't give up writing software to make money from this story not going to happen, I don't have anything to gain by being here...

Believe me when I tell you I am raising awareness because the bastard aliens are taking us for no ******* reason

That is what this is all about, exposing them
Edited by sarge: 
removed rule 10 violation


No other motive for me, I can assure you... I gladly invite you to come here and look I don't have anything t to hide
 
Last edited by a moderator:
cjdelphi said:
This is only true if your theory of them not visiting us is true
Click to expand...
I don't have a theory about them. You have an hypothesis about them.

Everything I said about your hypothesis is true.

Until you can support your hypothesis with objective evidence the null hypothesis - in this case, that alien craft are not visiting our planet - stands.

You're wrong they are here
Click to expand...

That is your hypothesis, for which you have no objective evidence.

Your only test for that hypothesis is whether or not objective evidence for it is eventually found. So far (and I myself have been waiting over 50 years) it has failed that test.
 
Last edited:
arthwollipot said:
Nick Pope is a journalist, not a scientist.

Ben Hansen is a chiropractor, so very much not a scientist.

Mary Rodwell is a nurse, and has an active financial interest in promoting the idea of alien contact through her website alienlady.com and the books, CDs, and hypnotic regression therapy she sells. Not a scientist.
Click to expand...

What is a scientist? Someone who knows how the world work? Chemistry, math, science? How about english or Spanish?

A scientist will rule out a brown out and a scientist will rule out a magical bulb lighting up from ther other side of the street

And then they will be stumped, because it's not explainable unless you think outside of human ability and scope

But, they will rule out the explanations given, if nothing more and that's fine with me
 
Last edited:
Pixel42 said:
I don't have a theory about them. You have an hypothesis about them.

Everything I said about your hypothesis is true.

Until you can support your hypothesis with objective evidence the null hypothesis - in this case, that alien craft are not visiting our planet - stands.



That is your hypothesis, for which you have no objective evidence.

Your only test for that hypothesis is whether or not objective evidence for it is eventually found. So far (and I myself have been waiting over 50 years) it has failed that test.
Click to expand...


Go and find out how many planets there are in the universe, then calculate how old the universe is, find out how much life could exist and then work out how many intelligent species are out there

Only ignorance leads a person to believe we are alone in the universe
 
cjdelphi said:
Go and find out how many planets there are in the universe, thenbcalculate how old the universe is, find out how much life could exist and then work out how many intelligent species are out there

Only ignorance leads a person to believe we are alone in the universe
Click to expand...

I don't need to do any of that because I know the answers already. I've been a keen amateur astronomer all my life.

I think it highly likely that the universe is teeming with life, though I suspect that intelligent life is rare. I certainly don't believe that we are alone in the universe.

None of which has anything to do with the topic of this thread, other than to suggest that alien visitors are not as inherently implausible as, say, ghosts or homeopathy. Your hypothesis that alien craft are visiting the planet still needs to be supported by objective evidence to be accepted. Which it is not.
 
Pixel42 said:
I don't need to do any of that because I know the answers already. I've been a keen amateur astronomer all my life.

I think it highly likely that the universe is teeming with life, though I suspect that intelligent life is rare. I certainly don't believe that we are alone in the universe.

None of which has anything to do with the topic of this thread, other than to suggest that alien visitors are not as inherently implausible as, say, ghosts or homeopathy. Your hypothesis that alien craft are visiting the planet still needs to be supported by objective evidence to be accepted. Which it is not.
Click to expand...

Astronomer look at planets they don't look for alien life

Your brother or whoever was correct, we are being visited we are being abducted, you're talking like the only evidence that exists is the video I supplied

Wrong, add it to all the other circumstantial videos, and now we have a compelling case...

An alien species 1 million years more advanced would visit this planet like you do a zoo, if your only reason for not accepting that is fear.

Don't be fearful, if aliens had any malicious intent we wouldn't be here how to to discuss this
 
Your hysterical flailing about the one and only way a reconnection attempt is permitted to look isn't a bundle of laughs either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom