Alien Visitation Contact Proof

[cjdelphi]

I did not call you crazy, as I don't do internet diagnosis.

I did suggest, and I will now state far more clearly, that claiming a degree in a relevant subject gives you some extra knowledge, then following that with obvious bollocks about polygraphs and abductions is not helping any claims of credibility. Quite the opposite.

That and one of my usual right, bang up-to-date pop cultural references.

I'm fed up of explaining how electricity works, if you have 1 circuit powering 10 lights, you can't magically make 1 of them come on leaving the others off, it's basic science and ohms law and kirchhoff agrees with me

I program micro controllers in C and write firmware controlling logic gates, video editing is for noobs and uni drop outs making movies, I work with mosfet and 4000 logic series chips lol

 

[Jack by the hedge]

I'm fed up of explaining how electricity works, if you have 1 circuit powering 10 lights, you can't magically make 1 of them come on leaving the others off, it's basic science and ohms law and kirchhoff agrees with me

Kirchoff would agree with you if you were describing a string of incandescent fairy lights. Not so much with a jumble of lamps driven by various switch mode supplies all powered in parallel.

 

[Steve]

Typical loony posting. Claims to have phenomenal evidence that would entirely change humanity's view of the universe. Evidence that any reputable news site would give their collective firstborns for. First (and only?) place it is posted is a small backwater internet discussion site. Spends pages posting in a vain attempt to convince skeptics that the meaning of "evidence" is actually different than what is commonly understood. We all know what the next steps will be - the only question is how soon.

 

[wollery]

Rramjet did it better.

 

[Myriad]

Top is at the start of the blackout; bottom is during the "search beam."

Note the same directionality of the highlights and shadows on the pots and behind the pots.

 

[bruto]

Wrong again, I supplied the proof anyone needs

I suggest you go learn what a "skeptic" is....

Aha., here we go. Countdown to "pseudoskeptic" accusation.....

A skeptic might be defined as someone who does not believe bad evidence. You think your evidence is good but it is not. Too many things you claim to be sure of are not made sure by the evidence you present.

It's not as good as you think.

Whatever your qualifications might be in real life or in your internet persona, you have not provided evidence that you know just how the power can and cannot fail, what fuses or breakers are present on transformers, and a few other things that are vital.

Where I live, power failures are often instantaneous and restorations the same, though of course sodium and mercury vapor street lights can often light with odd colors when they come back on.

You may know all sorts of things about all sorts of things, but what you know or think you know is not the same as what the camera shows.

You may well believe many things, and you might even be right in doing so. The problem is that, despite your allegations, the videos we see do not convince. There is too much unknown and unspecified and unseen. If we cannot see the source of the light we cannot analyze whether it comes from a flying saucer or a power company truck or something we didn't even think of. If we do not know for sure what caused the power failure and where it was caused, and what was done to fix it, we cannot know how it ought to have behaved. We cannot know, from the evidence provided, what possible anomalies or faults might exist in the equipment being used to record it. We are told by you that you got a photograph of a thing in the sky, but it was blurry so it is not shown. That is not evidence either.

You must understand here that the evidence is defective, even if the thing you are asserting is entirely real. Our lives are filled with situations in which we perceive things that are entirely real and entirely true, but if we cannot provide the evidence it is no fault of others that they do not accept the story.

 

[cjdelphi]

Typical loony posting. Claims to have phenomenal evidence that would entirely change humanity's view of the universe. Evidence that any reputable news site would give their collective firstborns for. First (and only?) place it is posted is a small backwater internet discussion site. Spends pages posting in a vain attempt to convince skeptics that the meaning of "evidence" is actually different than what is commonly understood. We all know what the next steps will be - the only question is how soon.

Now that is loony!

Guess what, nobody cares there is hundreds of "abduction" stories, the difference is, this as it stands is unexplainable unless it's alien visitation then it all, literally all of it makes perfect sense , you can't argue with logic

The government has shown UAPs, this is the next best evidence and if I don't show it to as many people as possible how do I spread the word we are being visited?

Mary Rodwell (hypnotherapist, written books)

Her email read "Hi Craig,
Yes the footage is very interesting sounds like this was a visit for sure"

Anyone with good eye sight and hearing knows this was not normal that's why I was kind of happy to see several accuse me of faking it.. good! It means they think it's too good to be real, which is precisely the opposite to the government released UAPs which are too "blury"

I believe I am the first to capture this on video, if I was abducted or not based on how tired I was .. none starter, I don't have the evidence

That video has missing time
An alien signal
A strange search light
Power being knocked out

All classic ufo crap, and yes if not for it being my video, I wouldn't be sure to believe it as it looks too good, I mean the light source hitting the ground was less than a meter away up yours government

Watch that video listen to the sound, you know deep down if that's not faked and what I say is true, and it is!... I wouldn't know how to edit a photo, I have the artistic skills of a 2 year old on crack

No clue at all, you know you can't find any light source like this taking out the power with some strange alien sound, regarding that sound. .

Is that alien interference from the light source or em radiation? Is that sound a result of communication? Obviously as the mufon woman told me, I will never get to the bottom of this...

So that only leaves me with awareness and telling everyone we are definitely not alone and we are definitely being visited, very minimum

 

[cjdelphi]

Top is at the start of the blackout; bottom is during the "search beam."

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=1444&pictureid=13167[/qimg]

Note the same directionality of the highlights and shadows on the pots and behind the pots.

Now look at the tree and everything behind the light source vs the power going out, notice how the tree is lit up by my light even dimly you would see that tree light up... can't be my light source

But I thank you for your investigative work and effort, few do!

 

[cjdelphi]

Top is at the start of the blackout; bottom is during the "search beam."

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=1444&pictureid=13167[/qimg]

Note the same directionality of the highlights and shadows on the pots and behind the pots.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bq89KIY5QiG4Nd_4PyUhmGbE935JnU2O/view?usp=drivesdk

In every shot with my lights on, you see them all reflect off the tree the search beam appears to reflect off of nothing and unlike when at the top of the tree you can see the light in the cars windscreen

It changes and focused, the light source would be identical if the light stopped outside my bedroom window as that is where the led light is outside my bedroom window

So in that respect ...

You just made me realize the shadows indicate where the light source intensity was, you genius! Now I know for sure it was my window not the neighbours

The neighbours would cast a different shadow on the pots!

Why didn't I see that before!

 

[cjdelphi]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ykd_5h0FshqnRnqyPWexjq02fGviOfQv/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XmNSm3iOeM8WSKUicpof5iYWfj7Zg3T-/view?usp=drivesdk

*led bulb is located middle far left...

Edit... https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bub2XsG6XySv5sG4uIIfTp3t8chgSg2g/view?usp=drivesdk



The bulb is located above my bedroom window, if the light intensity was at my window, you would see the same shadows, but.. my lights bounce off the tree and the bushes at the side.. so it's not mine

I wondered why the shadows were similar, I'm grinning right now, you answered me a puzzling question

 

[autumn1971]

Power going off on some farm but here power goes off only in huge storms, that's once in that last 20 years...

This is not true. I don’t care where you live, there are going to be blackouts and brownouts at least a few times a year.
Your observation skills may not be as keen as you believe

 

[cjdelphi]

This is not true. I don’t care where you live, there are going to be blackouts and brownouts at least a few times a year.
Your observation skills may not be as keen as you believe

Show me the power records proving that... if a brown out occurs my power supplies drop and batteries take over, and since I work from home, I think I'd notice a brown out in the day at least...

And since when have your brown outs resulted in a strange light and alien sound ?

 

[Craig4]

Even skeptics here admitted that light is not normal nor is the sound you hear or that missing time, it's like it was plucked

You can't say my lights caused this when you cant my lights on the neighbours rooftops reflecting

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YWkF5IzSo8Swyvkb8-XNSmRGwIw8ajkc/view?usp=drivesdk

And

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YWkF5IzSo8Swyvkb8-XNSmRGwIw8ajkc/view?usp=drivesdk

Both light and darkness are found in abundance here on earth. The terrestrial causes of both are myriad. That you can't identify the cause does not mean aliens. It means you don't know.

 

[Myriad]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ykd_5h0FshqnRnqyPWexjq02fGviOfQv/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XmNSm3iOeM8WSKUicpof5iYWfj7Zg3T-/view?usp=drivesdk

*led bulb is located middle far left...

Edit... https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bub2XsG6XySv5sG4uIIfTp3t8chgSg2g/view?usp=drivesdk



The bulb is located above my bedroom window, if the light intensity was at my window, you would see the same shadows, but.. my lights bounce off the tree and the bushes at the side.. so it's not mine

I wondered why the shadows were similar, I'm grinning right now, you answered me a puzzling question

That LED bulb appears to be mounted in a recess in a horizontal eave, shining mostly downward. There is no way it's evenly illuminating the trunk of the tree, in the top image of the two I screen grabbed. So in that top image, some other fixture (probably one of the same ones that are making persistent hot spots in the image for several frames after the blackout begins) that hasn't yet gone completely out is still throwing light on the tree trunk.

In the bottom image, just the LED lamp (if that's the one) has flickered on, illuminating the planters on the ground but not the tree, just as one would expect given it's position.

Speaking of things you didn't notice, can you explain why after the darkest frames (at exactly 6 seconds, in the 17 second video), then the red glow comes on for 9 frames, then the whole foreground including the tree and the car brightens for 6 frames (that could be the camera adjusting but...) then it darkens again (so it wasn't the camera adjusting). The obvious explanation is that at least one other light source in or on your house is still cycling; after all, this is all happening during the fraction of a second after the outage begins.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

... The bulb is located above my bedroom window, if the light intensity was at my window, you would see the same shadows, but.. my lights bounce off the tree and the bushes at the side.. so it's not mine

I wondered why the shadows were similar, I'm grinning right now, you answered me a puzzling question

The brief flash of light is considerably dimmer than the light's full output. You don't know how brightly that one lamp alone should light the tree because all you have to compare it with is all of the lights (not just that one) fully lit. As it seems to be an LED type we can assume that its colour temperature will not change as it dims or brightens, but we don't know how your camera will react to widely changing light levels and its white balance may well be off.

The same shadows indicate to me that the light is coming from the same source. I can't see what it means to you that so fills you with glee.

<edit to ask> Is that circled thing the LED lamp you mean? That lamp which is fitted to shine directly down and not sideways toward the tree? Obviously that light can't be the usual source of the light which shines on the tree.

 

[cjdelphi]

I think it's just the camera adjusting due to light sensitivity, but I have a screen capture of just that led light being on and no street lamps

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bq89KIY5QiG4Nd_4PyUhmGbE935JnU2O/view?usp=drivesdk

All my lights light up that tree and especially if the camera adjusted to low light levels, even the
dimmest setting would light up the base of the tree, in particular the metallic paint off the car yet that car doesn't reflect that search beam light when on the ground, damed how that works...

That said, I have no way of confirming that without breaking the law and forcing open the breaker box at the end of these shared homes I can only switch off what's inside my home

 

[Olmstead]

Why is that place lit up like a Christmas tree at 4 in the morning anyway?

 

[The Greater Fool]

What would help understand the lighting on the tree and bushes is a set of pictures from the tree and bushes back toward the camara, and a several that give a complete view of all the off camara area left, right, and center.

I say this because the lights go out and there is a low level red light on the tree and bushes, that looks to me like tail lights. Is there a drive way or parking area over there? What light sources reside there that are usually drowned out by the bright lights that are usually on?

This whole thing gives us a single camara's view. We have no idea what's going on not in that camara's view though we see the effects.

More pictures please.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

... the lights go out and there is a low level red light on the tree and bushes, that looks to me like tail lights.

I gather that red light is inside the house and so is the camera. The red glare which the camera picks up is reflected off the window. The red light is from some uninterruptible power supply and indicates the mains has gone off.

 

[cjdelphi]

The brief flash of light is considerably dimmer than the light's full output. You don't know how brightly that one lamp alone should light the tree because all you have to compare it with is all of the lights (not just that one) fully lit. As it seems to be an LED type we can assume that its colour temperature will not change as it dims or brightens, but we don't know how your camera will react to widely changing light levels and its white balance may well be off.

The same shadows indicate to me that the light is coming from the same source. I can't see what it means to you that so fills you with glee.

It fills me with glee because until now I wondered if the light truly did stop at my bedroom window or the neighbours, I realised the shadows when compared match

So that means the light source had to be the led bulb or the search beam, shadows off the pot plants proves it, if the shadows did not align it would mean the light source is further down the path

This is great news, it proves the light source intensity stopped outside my bedroom window the shadows prove it

Only problem for you is, the power was out and nothing was on... you can't make electricity light up that one bulb without seeing flicker everywhere else from every light source

But now I know the light source stopped outside my window it's further proof I was visited