... But, you are just driving home another point I made...Dems are reluctant to admit the obvious partisanship because they are afraid it will invalidate the findings in the eyes of some.
Yeah—no.
First off, those dismissing the committee's findings are pretty much Rump cult members. It's bizarre how they buy obvious lies about the stolen election in the face of the evidence which continues to grow. They have to be living in bizarro world where one believes the election was stolen
despite charges being dismissed by multiple judges including some appointed by Rump,
despite multiple people in Rump's inner circle testifying before the committee like Rump suck-up Barr that the election wasn't stolen,
despite officials denying the election was stolen in state after state where the supposed massive fraud occurred,
despite millions of dollars invested in a 'ninja' recount in AZ that found no significant fraud,
and despite evidence Rump had been planning his little coup attempt since the election.
Only a few of those cult followers are going to accept reality.
The people these hearings are meant to address are all the people who haven't really been paying attention. The public hearings are intended to spell it out for those people who know about the accusations against Rump but might be chalking it up to a politically motivated investigation.
There were real crimes committed here. It wasn't a crowd of protestors who got out of hand. Some of them had weapons stored across the river in a hotel they expected to retrieve and use if a gun battle ensued. There was a plan to nullify the votes in a number of states. Rump and his buddies had a multi-pronged approach to overturn the legitimate election result.
I could go on and on. The bottom line, the political party committee members are in doesn't matter. The evidence is overwhelming. There is one political motive and that is to convince enough of the public so they put pressure on the DoJ (namely Garland) to take the very huge step of actually prosecuting the ex-POTUS.
That's not going to be an easy decision for Garland. What's also going to help are the state prosecutions already underway against Rump for financial and tax fraud in NY and attempting to coerce Raffensberger to illegally alter Georgia's election outcome.
These are historical events. You can post that we in the thread are all partisan hacks. You can think it's funny we've tried to correct you.
You keep repeating the committee is partisan aka biased. But the evidence is overwhelming here regardless of who is on the committee. As much as you think it's funny people are replying to your posts, the joke's on you.
We don't really care what you think. 
