Wow, wouldn't have thought a Republican would have come out in support for free medical care.
Surely this is what he means, right?
....
If you show up in public or at the range with a high cap mag you are subject to it being confiscated and you getting fined.
Just saying. . .
Wow, wouldn't have thought a Republican would have come out in support for free medical care.
Surely this is what he means, right?
Gov. Abbott is on TV now holding forth about how the solution to mass killings is improved mental health services.
Except the penalty should be a criminal conviction and mandatory jail time
This is not wholly wrong. A part of me wonders what sort of life any lad can have had when as soon as he turns eighteen he buys weapons and kills a bunch of kids in an effective "suicide by cop". Part of me is actually sorry for him.
It's a bit like the "Swiss cheese strategy" against covid. No one thing works, but if you do all the possible things, added together you have enough to make a difference. Helping troubled young people, helping troubled families in the hope that their young people don't grow up to be troubled, surely that's part of the mix?
It was a very ordinary new-build suburban street in Hendersonville. The house was an end-terrace. Modern houses, almost "urban sprawl". I really don't see wildlife as an issue. I also don't think police access was likely to be an issue.
The gun was right beside her bed, not locked away in a safe place. In a house absolutely surrounded by neighbours. I can't see any reason for it being a difficult place for police to reach.
Burglaries happen everywhere. Women with lethal firearms within reach of their beds, not so much.
Well, he didn't say anything about free.
This is not wholly wrong. A part of me wonders what sort of life any lad can have had when as soon as he turns eighteen he buys weapons and kills a bunch of kids in an effective "suicide by cop". Part of me is actually sorry for him.
It's a bit like the "Swiss cheese strategy" against covid. No one thing works, but if you do all the possible things, added together you have enough to make a difference. Helping troubled young people, helping troubled families in the hope that their young people don't grow up to be troubled, surely that's part of the mix?
I remember pointing out that prior to the Dunblane restrictions there were just over 3 million people legally owning guns in the UK, and after the changes there were still just over 3 million people legally owning guns. The post-Dunblane changes took away about 50,000 guns.
On visiting relatives in a middle class town in CT in 1986, I was left on my one day when they went to work. I told them I planned to walk to the local shops for a look around. I was told not to, due to some home invasions making the local police and neighbours somewhat twitchy.
I then made the mistake of leaving the back door open, which was spotted by a neighbour, who came to investigate. I do know if he was armed, but thankfully he shouted into the house "whose there?" and he accepted my answer.
My relatives, who kept a handgun and shot gun in their bedroom, offered me the handgun to keep in my room, for my safety!
Guns were normalised to an amazing extent and the nearest equivalent, I can think of, is the Troubles in NI. Relatives there said it was normal to see guns and the army and my sister-in-law's uncle still has bulletproof windows in his house and has a handgun for personal protection.
I remember pointing out that prior to the Dunblane restrictions there were just over 3 million people legally owning guns in the UK, and after the changes there were still just over 3 million people legally owning guns. The post-Dunblane changes took away about 50,000 guns.
Then. what. is. your. point besides. dogwhistles?
Beto O'Rourke just tried to confront Abbott. Police threw him out.
I do not think the post Hillsborough and Dunblane restrictions on type of firearm have made any difference. As Cumbria and Plymouth have shown, it is still possible to kill many people with the types still allowed.
Far more important are;
1 - licensing to ensure those who have guns are highly unlikely to misuse them
2 - limit supply of guns to those not suitable.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...aths-in-six-months-as-police-stifle-gun-trade
As reported April this year;
"No London shooting deaths in six months as police say gun trade stifled
Met says drug gangs in capital finding it difficult to source and move around firearms"
Some gun control advocates lack the understanding of how AR-15s (and fire arms in general) work to the degree that they can't figure out that there's no need to ban the weapon. What they want could be achieved by banning high cap mags.
This gets society around the positively horrific scenario in which the cops are sent out to confiscate bubba's rifle. Talk about blood in the streets!
In this scenario mags beyond ten rounds would be illegal. if you have one and turn it in you get voucher for a five or ten round mag. If you don't turn it in the cops are going to assume you smashed it to bits with a sledge hammer.
But the cops ain't searching your house because they saw an old picture of you at a 3 gun match with a 30 round mag.
If you show up in public or at the range with a high cap mag you are subject to it being confiscated and you getting fined.
Just saying. . .
---------
Dope Clock II: It's been 345 days since Bobby Menard announced plans to create "Artists Valley". So far all he has done is lie through his teeth.